Comment Re:Could it be nobody buys them? (Score 1) 48
It could be that. What it definitely was, though, is that Sony thought they could make more money selling to data centers than to the public.
It could be that. What it definitely was, though, is that Sony thought they could make more money selling to data centers than to the public.
in the long run
Thanks for making my point for me there bro
Did you think we were the 'only surviving industrial infrastructure' until the 80s?
I'm going to go ahead and assume bad faith on your part, because otherwise you're very stupid. But nobody in your potential audience is stupid enough to believe there aren't lasting effects to being bombed to shit.
I take your point about this being before the dawn of ubiquitous tech companies, but what kind of chilling effect did the Bell monopoly have?
Do you wear your mask while driving, too??
Do you think about me when you're jerking off, too? I know you do.
It would take an AI to not get bored trying to construct working configs for SElinux
Perhaps you did not buy a Tesla. They are probably the most service-hostile vehicle ever sold in the US. Not sure about the UK, I haven't heard stories (horror or otherwise) about service for Chinese EVs yet. They would have to try really hard to be worse than Tesla, though.
It might take one person one year to write 25k lines.
A year? I've regularly written that much in a month, and sometimes in a week. And, counter-intuitively, its during those sprints when I'm pumping out thousands of lines per day that I write the code that turns out to be the highest quality, requiring the fewest number of bugfixes later. I think it's because that very high productivity level can only happen when you're really in the zone, with the whole system held in your head. And when you have that full context, you make fewer mistakes, because mistakes mostly derive from not understanding the other pieces your code is interacting with.
Of course, that kind of focus is exhausting, and you can't do it long term.
How does a person get their head around that in 15 hours?
By focusing on the structure, not the details. The LLM and the compiler and the formatter will get the low-level details right. Your job is to make sure the structure is correct and maintainable, and that the test suites cover all the bases, and then to scan the code for anomalies that make your antennas twitch, then dig into those and start asking questions -- not of product managers and developers, usually, but of the LLM!
But, yeah, it is challenging -- and also strangely addictive. I haven't worked more than 8 hours per day for years, but I find myself working 10+ hours per day on a regular basis, and then pulling out the laptop in bed at 11 PM to check on the last thing I told the AI to do, mostly because it's exhilarating to be able to get so much done, at such high quality, so quickly.
Google xkcd extrapolate
s/best/only/
No, I remember owning a calculator watch with phone directory because I could never remember phone numbers, outside of a few I used all the time. Then I got a cellphone and now I don't need to wear a watch.
Simp harder
I think they're arguing that they are the third thing, a message parlor.
Maybe someday Aptera will manage to get off the ground.
With three wheels? No doubt they will, insert clip of Reliant Robins here
Unions are a real-life strategy because they work. Divide-and-conquer is also a real-life strategy, because it works too.
Thus, I think the truth of your statement all depends on whether you look at this conflict between government and the the people, from the point of view of the attacker, vs the point of view of the defender.
A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.