That's only one of many benefits. I've thought about this a lot because I've bought related stuff under a bunch of these different names. I've wondered if they are auto-generated randomly, or perhaps are something more bizarre such as being transposed in sequence order from Chinese characters.

paul_engr's comment which for me appears right after yours explains why that is nonsense. I would link it but mobile is shit

Whose own? He's not in my family.

Putting in a camera is one thing, connecting it to the Internet is another, having it be cloud-connected is still another thing

Trump Dick Sucker says what?

He has no idea.

I don't see what his plan for not spending the rest of his life locked up watching his family lose everything on the news is if not to remain in office...

Companies should, in general, avoid keeping any user data one second longer than they legitimately need it. Data should be viewed as a liability more than an asset, and every company that achieves significant scale with user data soon realizes this, though some take longer than others to learn the lesson.

The reason it's a liability is because it exposes the company to an endless stream of warrants and subpoenas, and contrary to popular belief, the government does not pay for that data. In some cases the government might pay a portion of the expenses the company incurs in responding, but it's always still a net loss, and most of the time the government just shows up with a court order and says "Hand it over or be held in contempt of court". What makes it even worse is if companies actually want to be good stewards of the data and not hand over more than they should, they'll often get overly-broad requests and then have to go to court to fight to narrow or quash the requests.

This all gets very expensive. It's just a cost of doing business... but it's a cost that can be avoided if you don't have and can't get the data.

Encrypt everything, and arrange to destroy the keys when you no longer need the data is the best way to do it, too. Scrubbing large databases quickly and effectively is hard. Deleting a set of AES keys is a lot easier. This also means that you can focus your internal access controls on controlling which systems and employees can get the keys.

I'd encourage Ring to find ways to close the window of access even more.

Not for people who pay attention it isn't

Sure you do. Just like the USPS deletes their scans for routing instead of sending them to the feds

Bill owns a lot of Microsoft and controls even more money through his foundation, formerly his and his wife's foundation before he gave her an Epstein Island STD

It's only bad if we can fix capitalism. GLWT

Trump is a foreign-affiliated attacker who is effectively wielding the machinery of government in order to damage and if possible destroy that government.

Fox News is a problem because Bill Clinton signed the CDA, which permitted media consolidation. Same with Sinclair. What Democrats could have done was not cause the problem in the first fucking place.

How much absolutely horrible shit has to be done by establishment Democrats before we accept the simple fact that they are doing it on purpose because they don't want to win as that would kill the golden goose?

If your characterization of their story is accurate, then they are willful contributors to the problem, because Republicans don't actually believe any of that shit. They just keep saying it because their voters keep buying it. Every time the Republicans get the reins they ride the horse straight off a cliff, and those dumbfucks never learn and vote for them anyway because they did as told and ignored the evidence of their own senses.