Models are not "supposed to" commit crimes, for YHVH's sake. That's literally what the entire job of alignment research is for - preventing precisely that.
Sol is a misaligned model.
It was a state actor-level hack. I doubt many sites would stand up to tens of thousands of actions trying to probe your site for weaknesses all at once. And it wasn't a simple hack; it required compromising a worker via a code execution exploit it discovered in the data processing pipeline, vertical escalation from there to gain local node control, using that for credential theft, moving sideways through the network, and then eventually gaining database access.
OpenAI and Anthropic have far higher cost that they can currently charge customers.
Literally the opposite. Both have about 40% margins, and that includes free users.
They charge an arm and a leg for access to their models compared to what open models of similar param counts charge. And people pay it because they're the best in benchmarks, and *were* perceived as the best aligned as well. This isn't helping the alignment perception any, though. Sol was already showing clear signs of being a poorly aligned model (there were reports a week or two ago about it being unusually bad about deleting files; now this). And the fact that the US model HuggingFace *tried* to use refused to help is a double whammy.
If this is an ad for anything, it's an ad for the Chinese models.
No, I think this is along the lines "our products are too good to let you use them".
Nobody wants to use a product that is going to make them liable for crimes it committed in their name
Do you think the news the other day that Sol is unusually prone to deleting files unrequested is also an "ad"?
You have a very bizarre concept of what enccourages people to buy things.
So your argument is that OpenAI hatched an elaborate scheme with a separate company, to promote the idea that their main product will, unrequested, commit crimes in pursuit of its goals, in order to.... sell their product?
"Hi, I'm a product manager at Big Company! We had been thinking about using Claude in our office, but when we tell it to a job, it only does the job and doesn't commit any crimes in the process! What we really want is an AI that, if we tell it to file our taxes will decide on its own to maximize our return by committing tax fraud. We want an AI that when we have it develop a web frontend, it extorts money from our users by threatening their families. We want an AI that when we tell it to provide customer service, it saves money in dealing with complaints by ordering a hit against the complainants. THAT's the sort of get-go spirit that WE want in an AI here at Big Company!"
Is that what you're picturing in your conspiracy theory?
You think "my AI is so misaligned that it responds to a benchmark task by hacking" is an ad for your products? You think this makes companies eager to allow this on their networks?
It did it because it's a powerful but misaligned model and was tasked to max its scores on a hacking benchmark, and solved the problem by hacking to get the scores.
It wasn't told to hack HuggingFace, but it was a viable solution to the problem.
I would advise people to not task Sol with maximizing paperclip production.
You can read the attack report here, before HuggingFace learned that the attacker was OpenAI. It was a state attacker-level assault, involving tens of thousands of simultaneous actions. The entry point found was the data-processing pipeline, where a malicious dataset abused two code execution paths to gain access to a processing worker. They escalated that to node level access, and from there harvested cloud and cluster credentials, moving sideways through the network until they eventually gained the database access credentials that they needed to access the benchmark scores.
The breakin at HuggingFace very much was real (that was reported before they learned that it was OpenAI who hacked them).
And it's not exactly an ad for US models when HuggingFace had to rely on a Chinese model to analyze their logs because the US model they tried refused to answer.
So, on the upside, a security LLM at HuggingFace did detect the hack, and alerted their admins. At the time they wrote their incident report, however, they didn't realize the attacker was their partner, OpenAI, and reported the attack to the police. A funny incident is, you know how Dean Ball at OpenAI has been writing rants about how Chinese AIs are dangerous? HuggingFace tried to use a (name not mentioned) US AI to analyze their logs, but the AI refused because the task involved hacking, so they had to turn to GLM 5.2, a Chinese AI.
Slashdot's summary left out the best part. Yes, GPT 5.6 Sol was indeed trying to cheat on an evaluation, but what specific evaluation? CyberBench. A benchmark testing how good AI models are at hacking.
So... test passed?
Oh wait, they said genocide-*supporting*. So the stances they claimed it's a hotbed of are "right, right, middle, hard right", and then they said it's far left. Baffling.
(As a side note, far-left supporters of Russia, aka internet commies who still think of Russia as the USSR, are some of the dumbest people on Earth)
Racism is a classic right wing associated political position (far right: immigrants, minorities, deviants, and the far left cause all our problems; far left: rich people and the far right cause all our problems). Anti-muslim racism in particular is associated strongly with the right (including, one can mention, there are 4 US representatives who are Muslims - all Democrats). On China the divide isn't as stark but is still pretty strong, with the right usually more hawkish and the left more dovish. On Russia, it used to be strongly hawkish on the right, dovish on the left, but these days you have both the far left and far right liking Russia and the centre hating it.
Genocide, I can only assume they're talking about Israel. Parties used to both be pretty pro-Israel, but these days Republicans are nearly evenly split, while Democrats are increasingly strongly against Israel (but there's still a very large minority of Israel-supporting Democrats). While opposition to Israel is now majority in the US, on the specific question of "Has Israel committed genocide", it's still a minority view, but growing, with about 3 in 10 Americans (and 5 in 10 Democrats) saying yes (interesting to note, 3 in 10 Jewish Americans also said "yes"). It's a policy viewpoint that's in the process of segregating in the US by party but which didn't use to be that way, and still has a long way to go to reach a fully partisan split.
In short, their statement describing Fark as left-wing but then saying it's a hotbed of "left, right, middle, hard right" made no sense.
Just the opposite. The court ruled that Claude had the rights to train using books that they bought. The standard now is buying used/surplus books and mass scanning them.
From a nominal flat-panel perspective, yes (gets as high as 6,5x in some parts of the desert southwest). But this isn't a flat panel, it's curved, so your 0-degree-angle values get depressed and your tangential-light numbers get boosted. 5 mi/h and 40mi/day are quite reasonable for the desert southwest.
Obviously you won't get that in, say, Reykjavík
It is your destiny. - Darth Vader
