There seem to be plenty (and getting more) of these in the US today. There is no way the utterly greedy telcos would stop selling phones to them.

That sounds ... exceptionally useless?

The OWASP LLM Top 10 list this as a real and quite relevant risk. An attacker can bankrupt you this way.

Seriously, why are not trying to hide this in shame?

For coders? Probably. For regular people, no.

I have not gotten any mod-points for years now. Not that I really care, but they seem to _want_ to kill slashdot ...

Which essentially just shows how pathetic software testing is in the first place. But, yes, people do that to get "path coverage" and then forget about it.

Thanks. I do not even have user namespaces in my kernels. Did strike me as very unsafe and I do not use containers anyways.

And lose a major share of their revenue? Not going to happen. They rather make two versions, one for the EU and one for the suckers.

How are the billionaires supposed to get even richer with that crap slowing them down?

That does not surprise me in any way. Probably not even due to context compression or the like, just incapability of reliably following instructions.

Yes. "One character off" is not special in any way causing massive problems. It is like whoever wrote that crap has no idea what a formal language with a formal syntax is. Or how code works. The number of "characters off" is not a useful metric when discussion program semantics at all.

Apparently, "copy secrets into prompt" has been the number 1 cause of data leakage for the last few years already.

Only if you are stupid. You seem to be.

I think you are expecting way too much there.