(A) AI output has no copyright.
That depends on the country - or the law.

There may be copyright from stolen training data still in place though if the AI produces too verbatim.
Then that data would be copyrighted ... and the guy using it for training his new AI, would also infringe copyright.
No (new) AI company wants to risk such things.

I have been on it a bit more than a year ago. But I do not remember around when.

I doubt "AI" told me that, as you have to click "AI mode" to activate AI mode, which I only do when I do something that requires AI -I have a "free token pass", but no reason to abuse it.

A: copyright infringement on the output on another AI
B: contract violation. Because of A) every training contract forbids using other AIs
C: incest. You are simply back feeding stuff you know nothing about back into what you want to train. That can be useful with synthesized data, but is not what is wanted if you employ 10k internet monkeys to human fact check input and output.

I did not do a non agile project since 1998. (Actually 1992, when we invented our own agile methods)

And you: never did an agile project.

So, why complain about stuff you have no live experience in?

Most certainly I never do a non agile project for the rest of my life.

When everything in your world is politics, hype and abuse: your problem.

I learn, apply, reassess, and get better in applying.

You are constantly talking about stuff (negatively): where you absolutely have no experience in May it be AI or solar, batteries or Agile. Oh I forgot, you hate object oriented, too.

Strange.

There is no alternative.

So, what is your point again?

Agile removes the management and reduces it to a single person + users.

Win win for everyone.

Programmers organize their work themselves instead of getting pressed into plans done by someone else.

No idea what is wrong with that.

And that is not a "hashtree". So, what is your point again?

Everyone to stupid to give a comment to a link he links?

And? Again you forgot to make a point.

A Merkle Tree is not a tree of hashes. Unless you want to say, hashkeys are sorted in a Merkle Tree as a set of hashes.

Why not ... might make sense for what ever purpose it is done.

I think the Japanese web site is still there.

Did not visit it since 3 or 5 years, though.

Ooops: nope it is not.

Active Period: May 2001 â" March 31, 2025.

The hypnosis:

```
If I am not smart enough to understand what my code will do I am not responsible for very bad things it does under CFAA. Even if I know it is likely to do very bad things.
```

The psyop is that it is an independent intelligence free from the societal constraints of Justice.

This is analogous to some head of a corporation going, "We just dump the waste in the drain that says 'waste', the PCB's in the River aren't my fault."

Both groups are paying off governments to look the other way. We won't find justice there, apparently. (do prove me wrong, that would be great)

Here's a free book for the politicians in DC to read to learn why central planning always fails.

I mean it's only been out 106 years, so maybe they haven't heard of it yet.

TL;DR local cities have more information about what they need.

Of course corruption happens at all levels and some folks in cities still have DSL for that reason.

About what?

The EU is very well allowed to compete with businesses.

Government controlled means: someone controls that no "evil content" is spread.

It does not mean it controls the individual citizen. I thought that was clear.

The rule is: you can make a social network, but you are responsible for making sure no kids are there.
And that is wrong. Kids want to communicate with other kids.

The whole idea is bollocks.

And why would a child get more toxic content than its parents?
If you click: "not interested" nearly everything you are not interested in: goes away.

90% of the content you get on social media: is from your social friends!!! hence the name.

The rest is advertisement, which the platform/algorithm thinks fits my profile.

On TikTok for example, I get nothing unpleasant at all. It is configured that I only get stuff the algorithm is 100% sure I like, and actually: the algorithm is 99% correct.

If I had kids: for them it would be the same. No damn reason to not allow kids to exchange pictures.

Computer scientists, usually write "not equal" like this: !=
Or you could write !(a == b).

Works in most C-ish programming languages. Pascal uses a less sign and greater sign, I do not remember Apple Soft Basic :P

A bitcoin hash has nothing to do with a hashtree.
And a ledger and/or blockchain: neither.

Blockchain means: every bitcoin (or fraction there of) can be looked at, and traced back over all previous owners back to the original creator/owner.