Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:They know how, but they do not want to ... (Score 1) 18

Their core apps are allowed to access undocumented APIs

...which was found to be a violation of antitrust law when Microsoft did it...

How long before we find out that the public functions are just the private functions with delay loops added, like they were with Microsoft? How many iFanboys will still be defending them then? I bet it will be all of them.

Comment Re:Econmic collapse of 2008? (Score 2) 17

And even if new American companies learn to make them efficiently, they only have to undercut the foreign competition on price by a little bit. The proles will still take it in the neck.
If you look at the jobs stats

That's really the rub. Even if the manufacturing came back, which I agree it wouldn't, the jobs still wouldn't because automation has increased a hell of a lot over the last few decades. We could bring 100% of the manufacturing back and it wouldn't solve unemployment.

Comment Re: total batshit (Score 1) 112

Reduce opportunity? Then you're also identifying usery, debt and interest, as rent-seeking?

Fuck yeah.

A landlord does not have any duty to enhance 'opportunity'

Yeah, that's why the system is unsustainable. Very good observation, but too bad you had to lick boots about it.

If you think higher rents reduce opportunity and deprive for instance, shop owners opportunity to practice, then you must feel the same way about gasoline prices, taxes, utilities, every expense.

It must seem that way if you are very stupid and satisfied with facile explanations which make you feel smart.

Comment Re: and here i though they were one of the good o (Score 1) 114

The difference is, AI models do *not* keep a digital copy of the training materials.

The problem is, I specifically said this was about their training corpus.

Either you can't read, in which case learn to read, or you didn't bother to read before replying, in which case fuck you.

Comment Re: and here i though they were one of the good o (Score 1) 114

Yes, agreed. If you trade or sell your purchased copy of a book, you aren't allowed to keep any electronic copies.

They are destroying their purchased copy of a book, and they still aren't allowed to keep any copies, which is what I actually said and you disagreed with. Now you're agreeing? But not acknowledging that's what I said in the first place?

Comment Re:The Bill of Rights, stands. (Score 4, Informative) 31

I'm very happy to criticise my country, the PM and so on and so forth.

What I'm not going to be doing is be lectured by a smug American. America is descending to fascism right before your eyed. You beloved second amendment is more likely to get you shot by ICE than offer you any protection. Freedom wise, my country might be a long way from perfect, but I'd take it over the US.

Comment Re: and here i though they were one of the good on (Score 1) 114

There are laws both about making and distributing copies. They are both illegal. There are fines which can be applied even when you are making copies for personal use. You are generally considered to be allowed to format shift, but only if you keep the originals. Otherwise you could just be buying and returning (or reselling) media after making copies.

Comment Re: and here i though they were one of the good o (Score 1) 114

I read your citation. Either it doesn't say what you think it says or you don't understand what I said.

You don't have to destroy media when format shifting. You have to relinquish all copies when you trade the original. The original also is the proof of license. Guess what you've got if you destroy it? Not that.

Comment Re: Should be a sellers class action then!!! (Score 2) 12

Supposedly they look at return history of the customer to make decisions, but I think its crap.

ALL retailers are looking at your return history. Your return history with various stores is collected by a few aggregators who are there looking for return fraud. And Amazon is one of them - they have access to not just your return history with them, but if you return stuff to Best Buy and other places.

These companies track your returns and if it exceeds a certain percentage of orders, or even a certain dollar value, they will reject it. People have been warned that if they place the order with the intent on returning items on it, they will be banned from doing the return.

Retailers are checking because returns are expensive for them to handle - if you're someone to buy items and then return them (e.g., you buy a piece of clothing in 3 sizes to return 2), they will flag you from returns.

Slashdot Top Deals

Talent does what it can. Genius does what it must. You do what you get paid to do.

Working...