Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Is it too much to ask� (Score 1) 31

Is it really too much to ask that major companies be good at two things at once? Dual competence is essential for any long-term business survival. A company needs to master both its core discipline and financial operations. For example:
  • Boeing should be skilled in both engineering and business. Strip away the engineering, and you get dangerous products, death(!) and broken trust.
  • Warner-Discovery should be competent at entertainment and business. Put a dude-David Zazlov-and C-suite people in charge who only know how to churn out cheap reality slop and who shelves fantastic finished films such as Coyote Versus Acme just for tax write-offs, and you erode the delicate balance that built an industry giant.
  • PlayStation and Xbox need to excel at game development and business. Instead, we see industry titans that swing between snapping up all the studios they can and abruptly shutting them down, funding auteur projects like Physint and pulling funding the moment a balance sheet looks the least bit precarious.

Somewhere along the way, corporate governance bought into the myth that financial management is the only skill that matters, while the actual substance of the business -- such as the engineering, the art, or the entertainment -- is just a minor variable hardly worth considering. If a company isn't good at the what they actually make, they aren't actually good at business.

Comment Why not both? (Score 1) 167

imaginary risks, real risks

What if both are real risks? Without proper alignment and whatnot, we risk getting something straight out of Philip K Dickâs "Autofac" short story or even worse. The more I see, the more I use AI, the more think that the common trope in media of the disastrous consequences of robots and AI misunderstanding things just slightly or doing exactly what they were programmed to do without further context or understanding are real risks.

Comment Re:TDS (Score 1) 274

It means Iran has severely limited the capacity of the Strait of Hormuz. It's a hostage situation. No one is winning, but the objective isn't to win in the sense of completely closing the Strait, the objective is to create a sufficiently long period of pain that eventually the US and its allies walk away. Christ almighty, force multiplication is hardly a new concept.

Comment Re: A giant step forward for mankind (Score 1) 274

There are plenty of places in North America without coverage because there's so little to cover. The Los Vegas metropolitan area has about three million people. So yes, that would be a place with cell phone coverage. By the same token, coverage in states like Montana, particularly in mountainous areas is spotty because, well, there's not a lot of people.

Comment Re: The long-term impact of this on the US (Score 2) 195

I suspect you were just asked to be nice, and through a combination of spectrum OCD and insufficient cognitive therapy, you decided somehow you were being asked to do something wrong.

So you helped elect an ignorant sociopath. Congrats on that. Maybe you should have attended more of those cognitive therapy sessions.

Comment Re:Their real argument (Score 1) 137

Jesus Fucking Christ. It's 2026, Trump has been putting his boot on the necks of major networks and studios for a year and a half now. I realize you probably fell into a coma in 2016, but ten years later, the free press, regardless of what you think of it, or fair you imagine it is, is under direct assault. Fuck off with the "MSM" bullshit and grow the fuck up.

Comment Re: Put out fires quickly letting fuel build up (Score 4, Insightful) 33

40% of Canada's land area is covered in forests. It is simply impossible to "manage" that much forest, and it's utterly fucking absurd to suggest otherwise. And to try to take climate change out of the equation is just a way of misdirecting away from the actual fucking cause; GHG emissions raising surface temperatures.

When will humans stop buying the most trivially fucking moronic red herrings? What a disreputable idiotic species.

Comment Re:Put out fires quickly letting fuel build up (Score 2) 33

It's almost as if allowing emissions to ramp up with little meaningful effort to control them is having the inevitable consequences predicted decades ago. But let's not deal with that, because it's hard. Instead let's have the President of the United States demand Canada hold back the tides.

Comment Re:Why do you hate yourself? (Score 1) 105

I don't actually use Apple Store all that often. A fair portion of the software I have installed, like LibreOffice and Firefox is just installed via DMG images. It kicks up a window about unrecognized source, but then just works. iOS devices are definitely more locked down, but the Macs are really no different as far as installing software than Windows or Linux.

Comment Re:For Insiders on the Experimental channel (Score 1) 105

I imagine the Mac Neo is the real source of their panic. Right now RAM prices are probably saving them from even more losses, but the hegemony is coming to an end. If a credible useful, at least for average users, non-Windows platform using smart device level hardware can sell as well as the Neo has, I'd say Microsoft's reckoning is finally upon them.

Slashdot Top Deals

To write good code is a worthy challenge, and a source of civilized delight. -- stolen and paraphrased from William Safire

Working...