Probably. But the post processing work will still have to be done. And now there's lots more to do.

At some point, we may be able to resolve features of the crystal spheres themselves. And put all this heliocentric nonsense to bed.

Just like Wanksy.

Not using a Baghdad battery? NGMI.

Experience is the best teacher. So where do they get the experience?

You are absolutely right. Nobody here wants to hear it.

I'm not sure what the hackathon rules say about slapping a search engine on top of Stack Overflow either. And that's basically what Turcios is doing. On one hand, I'm not sure if a 'smart' h.r. department at a software company hasn't caught on to this ploy during hiring interviews. (If such a thing as a smart h.r. department actually exists.) And refused a job offer.

On the other hand, this _IS_ code reuse. Which many companies support.

During WWI, the Germans didn't like the USA handing their troops civilian weapons either.

Not running onboard the plane. But the code running on the systems may very well be generated by AI. How would the FAA ever find out?

There are 10 types of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't.

I learned that decades ago. Using a soldering iron.

Try to sit a colleague down and recite a complete application software specification to them. If they don't fall asleep, they will probably try to strangle you.

A formal spec is a difficult thing to write. But once done, it is practically an executable program by itself. Generating actual machine code from one is a simple exercise. Been there, done that. About 20 years ago.

I can grasp it. I can reach out and strangle it any time I want.

Night sights.

No thanks. I've already seen La Cage aux Folles.

Just slow it down and sync it with the music.