You want to continue looking absolutely stupid. Got it.

You don't have to work so hard at it though. Whatabouting another indicted war criminal to justify threatening explicit war crimes is an interesting tactic.

And yes, bombing civilian power infrastructure is a war crime.

Sure is roomy living rent-free inside your empty fucking head.

Glad to see I'm still living in your head rent free.

I must have really caused some kind of narcissistic injury for you to spend so much time following me around, going out of your way to post this mindless nonsense.

Get mad, anonymous douche. Thanks for letting me know that I'm living rent-free in your head.

What, you still butthurt over me making you look like the unthinking Republicult member you are?

But you still want other people to do your sourcing for you.

And you are still following me around, posting anonymously, things I never said.

But you go on with your false bullshit, bad faith argumentation, cultist circular logic, and post-facto justifications of an illegal war. It's clear you have no actual leg to stand on here, or you wouldn't be going out of your way to hide who you are.

Which of those things is written into US law as being a trigger for a bombing campaign?

Oh, they aren't.

Still illegal under US law, which is my sole position that you seem unable to grasp.

But do keep going with the straw man post-facto justification for an illegal war. That doesn't make you look like an idiot at all.

So link to the plan if you know what's in it.

Oh, you can't, because it hasn't been publicly disclosed. You're guessing just like a simping idiot.

Oh look, I have an anonymous coward troll following me and putting words in my mouth I did not say.

Please quote for me where I said "I'm against stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons" - you put it in quotes, so show me the quote.

Otherwise, you are a lying cultist fucktard who cannot think for themselves and spends their day beta cucking for liar warmonger oath-breaking dipshits.

For the record, since you seem to be incapable of actually comprehending basic english language, I don't want to see a nuclear Iran just as much as anyone else. However, I also want to see the US administration follow US law. And if the US administration doesn't follow US law, I want to see the US Congress do something about that.

Is that easy enough for you to understand, dumbass?

I didn't vote for this shit.

70+ million people directly didn't vote for this shit.

Millions more voted for these liars, because they lied about not doing exactly this. Now they are doing this.

It's easy to blame victims and look like a total dipshit, isn't it?

I didn't vote for these assholes.

And the people that did vote for these assholes, didn't vote for them to be doing this shit. In fact, these candidates campaigned on NOT doing this shit.

So do tell me how I could have "voted better" when nobody wanted this?

Go fuck yourself for victim blaming.

Because there are still other ways of finding and installing software.

Expect that to change as Microsoft tries to hoard a bigger slice of the pie.

Well this seems like a key asset to have in a long-term growth strategy then.

Remind me why I would want to put my retirement savings into an investment vehicle that can disappear overnight?

But how will parenting get confirmed identities to the big corporations for better advertisement targeting?

Why do you compare GrapheneOS to a standard Linux desktop, instead of to Google Android?

Obviously, if you take a platform that is geared towards running applications from untrusted sources and compare that to a standard Linux desktop distribution that isn't configure for that, you'll find common desktop Linux lacking.

On the other hand, does GrapheneOS or Android have a desktop that's halfway usable?

Historically, Linux got the reputation for being more secure because Microsoft made a number of brain-dead decisions, some in clear support of a better user experience (arguably, but the omission of 3 letter file type indicators was to not complicate things too much), some just brain-dead (open ports and running services), Linux fanbois boasting and then some real advantages of Linux through the Unix heritage: being a multi user OS with the networking built in and not tacked on afterwards.

All these points are still true for Linux, though the competition has caught up. For the true paranoid, if you need to sandbox, you're doing it wrong.

So what?

Yes, you can configure a ridiculous thing that nobody will buy from other manufacturers. And guess what? Those guys don't sell those ridiculous configurations either. But for them it's just options on top of the base config that everyone does buy.

For Apple it's an entire product line.