Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: Fatalism (Score 1) 322

Electric bikes exists.

Yes they do. They are also vilified and legislated against aggressively.

But have you been incentivised to buy an electric bike?

Absolutely NOT. Constantly harassed with more and more restrictions being added. It is literally impossible to buy a long range e-bike legally nowadays. (because battery power can be traded for speed)

Comment Re:Synergy (Score 1) 135

Did SpaceX build rockets to fuel Starlink, or did Starlink fuel the need for cheap launch vehicles?

Someone saw the ability to launch stuff into space more cheaply so a rocket company was born. This enabled the satellite thing because why not send up useful payloads while validating? Not chicken and egg I think.

Comment Re:It's not pedantry if it's science (Score 1) 64

I guess these are the same people who think that the vacuum of space will freeze you

Ummm, you will become "frozen" solid if your body is unprotected in space. No, you will not instantly freeze... but given enough time, your body will radiate heat until it is the same temperature as space itself... which is basically slightly over 0 Kelvin.

Or were you railing against the idea that a body will freeze as fast as if it were dropped into liquid nitrogen?

Comment Re:May? (Score 1) 64

China had a practice run at this a few years back when it blew up a satellite with a surface launched missile and the Russians would try the same if they had any competence left in their military.

Yeah, and the US Navy shot a missile from a Destroyer at sea that took out a satellite immediately afterwards. They shot from land, the US shot from the sea, considerably more difficult.

Comment Finally, we can afford ad-blocking classes (Score 2) 29

I love the idea of Facebook money being used to teach kids how to block advertisements. $25B should be enough to teach every single kid in New Mexico how to do it, going forward forever, as a permanent addition to public school curriculum.

I was going to suggest that maybe we could even use a tiny portion of the money to establish a state DNS server that blackholes the adservers the way pi-hole does. Then kids stuck running proprietary "apps," instead of accessing things through their Manifest-V2-compatible web browser, wouldn't have to install their own DNS server.

But then I realized the aforementioned ad-blocking curriculum ought to have resulted in every kid building their own pi-hole at school anyway, so a state pi-hole is unnecessary.

Comment Re:You cannot destroy data, harmless or not ... (Score 1) 329

I understand why you are arguing the way that you are; however, the law isn't really respected anymore. It literally CAN'T be respected anymore as the supreme court said that a sitting president is immune to all law. That means the law is whatever the president is willing to abide by. How can anything that is arbitrary actually be respected and followed?

Comment Re:That's easier to do (Score 1) 124

Its a little tricky too, as children generally don't have suitable investment accounts that can hold publicly traded shares. I'm doubtful they even legally can open those accounts.

I am guessing you and everyone else here forgot about: https://trumpaccounts.gov/

Somehow or another, that is claimed to be a genuine government website. I feel sick to my stomach.

Comment Re:"if you pay for it, you own it" (Score 1) 152

Normally, you don't license media (whether it's digital or analog is irrelevant). That CD or tape or vinyl record is sold, such that you own that copy. Title is transferred just exactly the same as how title is transferred when you buy (not license) a loaf of bread, or a screwdriver, or a book. (WARNING: Though I say "normally," what's normal does change. I'm aware that a lot of people use proprietary streaming to consume media now, instead of playing locally-stored purchased copies, and those people likely did agree to a licensing contract rather than purchasing anything.)

But with software, they've been claiming that a piece of paper that they inserted into the box, retroactively causes the sale to not have really happened, even though the information that the sale was a fraud, is hidden inside the box until after the fraud has been perpetrated. The customer thinks they bought the box rather than licensed it.

There was some monumental decision reinforcing this a while back. I'm not sure this is the best example, but it's well-illustrated in this decision in favor of Blizzard against a cheatbot named Glide, where the judge supports the outrageous assertion that WoW purchasers actually did not purchase what they thought they purchased. And then instead of throwing Blizzard's executives into prison for a decade to deter future fraud, he found in their favor instead. Dirty judge. He actually fucking says this:

section 3 of the EULA provides that Blizzard explicitly retains title to “all copies” of the game client software

[emphasis mine]

For whatever reason, nobody's tried that outside of software (that I know of). I still haven't seen a EULA packed in a loaf of bread or a music CD case. But maybe some day....?

You wouldn't necessarily be wrong to expect this form of fraud to happen some day, so perhaps you're right that Congress should nip it in the bud ASAP. Sure, ok. But Congress is normally reactive so it also makes sense they're seeing it just as software problem. None of their constituents are complaining about media companies defrauding them, just software companies.

Comment Re: Huh (Score 3, Interesting) 109

More people should spend more time trying to enjoy their own lives instead of obsessing over what other people are doing

I mistook your sig for a final paragraph in your post, and did a double-take!

Reading other people's code is a big part of how I learned to do things. I enjoyed Abacus' "Anatomy of the Commodore 64" for it's commented disassembly of the C64 ROMs. But it was easy for that to make sense, because it had been written in assembly language.

But once you're looking at to binaries compiled from higher-level languages, it gets more complicated to .. uh .. recreate the original intent.

Now they got computers to do that? Fuck yeah!

Comment Re:1 ... 2 ... 3 ... (Score 1) 36

But this is a count-in too. He even wrote the first line of the song for you.

Shitstorm because of AI
The computer is making me cry
Hallucination's a bitch
But they say it'll make me rich
[first guitar solo]

Comment Remarkable, really? (Score 1) 27

the game's uncommon method of generating galaxies of incomprehensible scale on device consistently for all players from a single-seed happening on a phone is remarkable for those of us who remember phones performing far behind consoles or desktop PCs.

No it isn't. Your phone is a supercomputer by 1980s standards, and seeded generation (whether from a PRNG or hashing coordinates or whatever) goes back to at least then (and probably '60s/'70s). I'm not slamming the game, and seeded generation is often a good idea, but the idea that you can do it on handheld supercomputers is not remarkable, even the tiniest little bit.

You wanna see something super-fucking-impressive on an iPhone? Go back to the very first model and behold that it runs a truly-remarkably decent web browser. That was way more futuristic than this.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real computer scientists like having a computer on their desk, else how could they read their mail?

Working...