mod parent up, as we all have suspected, when the big boys lose it, then it is now called 'errorneous trade' and the exchange cancels that.
So start a competing exchange without HFT, without do-overs for the banksters, without trading floor hours. I'm sure the SEC won't make it impossible!
It may have caused GS to lose some money.
Which doesn't happen. Every day is an up-day for Goldman, but they don't control the markets...
Because abortion is murder, the Supreme Court supports murder.
You're not this dense. Come on, now.
You wrote that "Roe V. Wade said" that "to protect the privacy of a woman we must allow murder." It didn't. You are wrong.
You can say the effect of the decision is that, but that is not what the decision or the Court ever said.
There is nothing about this I do not understand, except for the part where you insist on lying about what was in the Supreme Court's opinion.
None of your comment is relevant to the fact that you were wrong when you said the Supreme Court decision said that murder was OK.
Nor anybody else who knows there are higher powers than the US Government
False.
Look, I get it. You think abortion is wrong. So do I. But you said something simply false: that Roe v. Wade said we must allow murder to protect a woman's right to privacy. It did not say that. It said that abortion is not murder. You can disagree that abortion is not murder, but that is what it actually said.
You're probably right, but I tend to look at the things in front of me and evaluate them on their own merits, rather than their motives. Which is why I spend too much time on trolls.
Scanning for content, scanning for content
:-) AHA! Thank you! You just proved you are full of it.
I "proved" I am "full of it" by not providing evidence for *your* argument.
You really think anyone actually believes you're serious?
As we all know, nothing needs to be said. It is well understood who specifically benefits from 'local' governance.
Right. Everyone.
And we don't have to mention who you prefer to dominate. History has already told us. That is also well understood.
Right. Everyone.
Your refusal to answer is all the answer we could possibly ask for. The code was broken a long time ago.
Liberty isn't a code. It just *is*. Socialists like you want to violate it at every turn.
Regardless of whether or not they think they are of a different gender, the fact is that most people associate gender pronouns with physical sex. To them -- us -- the proper pronoun to use is one of physiological fact. Bradley Manning is a he. There is no Chelsea Manning, and if there were, he would be a he. These are the actual facts, to me.
Now, if you choose to recognize gender above sex, and accept that everyone gets to dictate to the rest of us what their gender is, then fine, to you, "she" is correct and "he" is incorrect. However, how does it make sense that Manning can decide for himself his own gender, but I cannot decide for myself that my use of pronouns is based on physiological sex?
It's just another example of how the left is not pro-choice at all, they are only pro-choices-they-agree-with.
Who cares what the proponents and the Supreme Court thinks if they are wrong?
Obviously not you.
Give an example of where people were not more free as power became more local.
Be more specific.
No. You are the one who said I was wrong; so say what you meant when you said so.
Go home, timothy, you are drunk.
I thought this might already exist, but I'm not finding it with a quick Google search. Seems like it's a thing that could get ad views from some decent IT audiences.
if the author wanted to be rewarded for his work he should charge be charging a fee for the program. Simple as that.
It's only "simple as that" if one has knowledge of only one economic model and is unaware of the studies showing higher overall revenue via the model Kovid is using (effectively executed, of course).
"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson
