Cool, can you help me out? I'm having an awful time understanding color. What's it like to experience that?

Total Nonsense.

Hell, dreams haven't been demonstrated empirically.

Don't they teach you kids anything about epistemology these days?

Is there any reason that you haven't listed any of your alleged "failures". (I suspect it's because you don't actually have any in mind and you're just repeating a silly meme.)

As for Tizen, we'll see if that's the case when it's actually released. :) My claim "the best browser on the market" remains true.

Now, your claim was that the BB10 browser "was not great" and that you "prefer firefox on android".

Do you still stand by that?

Sorry for the horrible analogy:

Start with html5test and work your way around.

Routers and mainframes are nice... but which one will you find running nuclear reactors?

I'm not here to do basic research for you. Go do some reading.

I agree that BB does multitasking significantly better than the competition. I disagree that it is rivaled by Android's approach to multitasking. I don't think it even comes close.

The superintendent of schools who testified in the Scopes Monkey Trial?

I don't remember anything about him having or needing two phones.

I couldn't agree more.

Here's hoping that this bizarre trend comes to a swift and decisive end.

It's it obvious? Hale-Bopp brought closure to Heavens gate! We missed our chance.

That argument's been around for years. It hasn't improved with age. Becoming a me-too player in a crowded market while simultaneously cutting off the few remaining advantages you have over the competition does not sound like a recipe for success!

Less obvious, but still important, Android kinda sucks. The development tools suck, multitasking sucks, the UI is a mess, etc. The only reason that it's the dominant player is that it's cheap and far more open than other offerings.

It was pretty obvious that Android will win in the short term -- but it will fall, and fall quickly, to any OS that's at least as open and cheap with better dev tools and UI.

Oops, forgot this part:

I have plenty, at least against computationalism. I've found that it's a waste of time trying to explain it to slashdotters who are apparently unwilling to do the reading necessary to understand it.

Nor should it be necessary! Do I need to tear down logical positivism and every other dead idea that some yahoo decides to push? It's not worth the effort. Just tell 'em it's dead and let them do the reading.

So, I'll tell you, go do some reading. Computationalism is dead. It's been dead for ages. If you didn't know that it was dead, chances are you don't know enough about the problem to be able to save it with whatever ad-hoc justification you make up to hang on to that outdated belief.

So what will it be? Are you off to hit the books or are you going to hold steadfast to your unjustified and indefensible beliefs?

Ad hominem? Nope.

Appeal to authority? Nope.

Weasel words? Nope.

Your baloney detection kit sucks.

How is it inferior? Oh, it doesn't have as many apps. Well, unless you count the tons of Android apps that it'll run (10.2 brings Android 4.2 compatibility).

The only feature we've talked about is the browser, which is *objectively* better than the competition. I wouldn't call that inferior.

We could talk about subjective things like the UI, but that won't get us anywhere as you're unwilling to use the OS yourself long enough to develop an informed opinion. (There are some other issues that Android users need to deal with that BB10 users do not, but you'll just rationalize those away like iOS users did over copy/paste, multitasking, etc.)

We could go over technical details about the OS, but that obviously wouldn't work in your favor, so I doubt that interests you.

Looks like you're just bashing someone else's preference for the hell of it, That sounds like trolling to me.

For whatever reason, this puts me in mind of Whitehead's process ontology

He's referring to this: