Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nobody "Excluded" Anybody (Score 1) 204

"Asking these people not to show up under these circumstances is absurd. It only makes them more interesting in attending. Racking up arrests and filing charges is how these people show their bosses that they are doing their jobs. That can be done by finding criminals and it can also be done by making criminals."

Yeah, but at the same time, their "suggestions" carry some weight. Certain DefCon folks have pwned the Feds more than once... when they had far less reason to do it.

Comment Re:I've got this one (Score 1) 192

worked with states to build resiliency and make our nation's emergency and disaster response capabilities more robust;

So..nothing again. At least, nothing quantifiable, which is pretty much the same thing.

Oh, no, this one isn't "nothing", you've read it wrong. What they mean by this is "we have equipped your local police force will military equipment and trained them how to treat the local residents as enemy soldiers." And they've done a really good job at it. They're now using no-knock paramilitary raids for pretty much any suspect, whether they are considered potentially violent or not. And killing the pets.

Comment Re:University of Califonia? Oh, they'll love her. (Score 1) 192

Getting rid of UC's medical research facilities is indeed a very simple answer.

Didn't "simple" used to be one of the euphemisms for "mentally retarded"?

I think the GP was referring to the military contracts, not necessarily the medical research. Be that as it may, it seems wasteful (and ... cronyish) to hire a powerful Federal administrator that can use influence and connections to obtain grant money rather than allow the grant applications to pass or fail based on the merits of the research involved. They've already gotten too focused on "monetizing patents", which can bring in a lot of money for treating things like sexual dysfunction and balding, than on work to actually cure diseases that cause suffering and death.

Comment Not Suited (Score 1) 192

Do the "UC Officials" realize that J. does not use email? I suspect she doesn't even know how to use a computer. I'm not convinced someone like that is really suited to run a university system, where students should have those skills, and are in an environment where communicating electronically is essential.

Comment Re:As someone who uses GNOME 3... (Score 1) 181

On the other hand distributions like Fedora, Arch, Mandriva forks or Gentoo did the right thing in following the "latest and greatest"

I think the trick here, for the governance of the distros, is when the latest isn't the greatest. "Follow upstream" is an easy approach, but some sort of criteria ought to be thought about for when doing so is going to cause damage.

My recent Fedora upgrade pain was around the MariaDB/mysql swap-out. Improper dependencies aside, that's the kind of change that was handled properly.

Comment Re:Sad, but no great loss... (Score 1) 164

Yes, but ComputerShopper at articles too...

Riiiight .... I read Computer Shopper for the articles. Yeah, that's the ticket, the articles.

I used to buy quite a bit from NewEgg. Before they charged me a $350 restocking fee for an unopened extra switch that had been ordered for a project. Amazon Prime gets it here faster anyway.

Comment Re:The urban poor subsidized the rich for a while (Score 1) 372

This one might just go away due to market pressures. USPS won't bring a package to my house, but UPS and FedEx are here several times a week. At this point, USPS has no cost advantage for packages, so I actively avoid them whenever possible. The cost curves show USPS becoming far more expensive than UPS or FedEx in the next few years, so I'm not sure who will use them for package shipping anymore.

Comment Re:The urban poor subsidized the rich for a while (Score 1) 372

Seems to me the point is to ensure remote people get access, not to make the system have a higher utility overall.

There are places in my town that aren't on the plan to get broadband in the next 10-year window. None of them are more than three miles from a decent fiber and many of them are low-income. So it'll be 2024 and they'll still only have dial-up (especially those on the north side of hills).

Meanwhile the telecomm companies are charging $30-$60K per mile of cable pull if those people want to get hooked up, thanks to their monopolies. Seems like cronyism as usual to me.

Comment Re:Real-world examples, shaky foundations (Score 1) 580

Diff EQ and Linear Algebra were also very shaky for me, they did not make sense until later in grad school when I finally found more relevant physical examples. Now I review them in engineering courses when I teach and I make a point to pull out various applications more explicitly.

I wish math profs would do a better job on this topic. At GT I had a great prof that taught calculus for engineers. He got it. Some math profs don't. They won't let engineering profs teach basic math from accreditation standpoint AFAIK, even though it is like requiring a novelist teach basic grammar.

Comment This just in... (Score 5, Insightful) 401

The employers are very fussy. They are really only interested in a perfect match to their needs. They don't want the cost to develop talent internally. They are even trying to combine positions to save money. I came across one employer trying to combine a mechanical and electrical engineer.

Read between the lines: "We can replace all of them with immigrants, but only if we can prove there's nobody who can fill the position. I know! Let's draft the requirements so they're impossible to fill, then hire the same person we would have anyway at half the price because we had to 'settle'. Brilliant!"

Comment Re:badg3r5 (Score 4, Insightful) 193

Oh wait... I thought you were joking!

The SHA1 of "badg3r5" really is "78a7ecf065324604540ad3c41c3bb8fe1d084c50".

http://www.sha1-lookup.com/index.php?q=78a7ecf065324604540ad3c41c3bb8fe1d084c50

HP used "badgers" in leet-speak for an NSA backdoor? Smells like they wanted people to know, to me. Maybe they didn't like what they were supposed to be doing, and stuck their tongue firmly in cheek at the implementation stage? "Screw the NSA - we'll give them a back door if they want it so much - and we'll make it so that researchers find it easily, so our business isn't damaged in the long term ("If we wanted you data so much, we'd have done a better job of hiding it - blame your government")

Slashdot Top Deals

"But what we need to know is, do people want nasally-insertable computers?"

Working...