Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:People just don't care about 10 cents (Score 1) 192

Correct; the metrics I have seen suggest only about 10% of plastic that is specifically put into the recycling stream ends up recycled. This of course has a lot to do with the simple fact that most plastics are either impossible or economically prohibitive to recyclable in the first place.

I personally think this will change in the near future as we get better at engineering enzymes, but this also means I that I think all efforts to do large-scale plastic recycling today are essentially just feel-good money sinks.

Comment Re:People just don't care about 10 cents (Score 1) 192

> Oddly enough, the Connecticut ban on non-reusable plastic bags has been somewhat successful.

You literally go on to describe the exact thing that is happening in CA and still think it's working? The extra few people bagging their groceries in old potato sacks has nothing on the fact that the rest of the people are still tossing plastic bags that now use 5x as much plastic as the old bags. By that metric, any "ban" must reduce bag usage by 80% before it can even be break-even with the prior situation. Unless you are seeing 9 out of 10 shoppers walking into a store with their own bags, the bag ban is not working in the slightest.

And this says nothing of the accumulation of "real bags" this causes -- I have so many of these fucking cheap "woven" poly bags that they are coming out my ears. I use them as packing material; planting ballast, dust covers, but mainly I just throw away heaps of them because they are literally designed to be garbage. They are made out of the exact same stuff as the old bags, so they degrade, but unlike the old bags that stood a chance of falling to bits in the landfill, the new bags just fall apart on the shelf after they've been sitting around a couple of years.

Comment Re:Found Sable's mistake... (Score 4, Interesting) 23

Patent trolls have actually been losing some ground in ETX as of late, so they are coming over to WTX as apparently favorable. I can only see their scattering-roach behavior as a positive development, and living in WTX and having been summoned for service a number of times in this district court myself, I say keep em coming; we will keep tearing them new assholes. Despite having the appearance of a politically motivated court, I think that patent trolls will not be able to enjoy the same success as they have historically achieved in ETX. Slow steps in the right direction, I hope....

Comment Re: This comment section is gonna be good. (Score 3, Interesting) 304

Nope, it's a bootstrapping system. You hook in the useful idiots with the obvious bullshit (QAnon, etc) and now you have 1-2% of the electorate sure...SURE..they are on the inside. There's no one more zealous than a recent convert. Now you come in with the deep fakes, the semi-plausible, grade A crypto-bullshit and if all the sudden hundreds of thousands of people are posting about it everywhere you see...well, its gotta be true, right? That many people can't be wrong!

Comment Re:VR headsets have been a thing for years. (Score 1) 203

more like legislators and their constituents are getting stupider. there is no need to pass additional laws for something that is plainly within the scope of the existing laws. It's counterproductive and can erode the scope of the original laws. It also limits potential future applications where AR/XR technologies could be used to reduce driver distraction and improve awareness, ya know, just like is already being done in things like race cars and fighter planes.

Comment Re:Reckless driving is already illegal (Score 1) 203

No, actually it's not necessary to specify this; the existing laws already have enough breadth to cover the case. When you start applying specific scope-limiting definitions on top of broadly applicable laws they cease being broadly applicable.

So, the real situation is actually the completely opposite of your intuition, and if the fine gentleman from Massachusetts passed his stupid notion by anyone even remotely experienced with law he would have been immediately rebuked. This is a waste of time, and also how I know he is an unqualified idiot. Good job, MA; glad I don't live there.

Comment Re:Why? (Score 1, Interesting) 82

When you have a coffee shop (traditionally, this is a shop that makes a handful of drinks from milk and coffee) but all of your customers want to buy drinks made with stuff other than coffee and milk, this is what you get.

Milk foams up because it has loads of fats and proteins in it. If you want to make homogenized oat mash foam up the same way so you can sell it as a $6 cappuccino, youre gonna have to put fats and proteins back in it. IMO olive oil is a pretty good choice for Starbucks demographic.

If eating half a teaspoon of olive oil gives you the shits, I gotta say that's on you. You can always go back to having the traditional ingredients. By "traditional" let's be clear that I mean the coffee and the milk recipies that have been developed and endured worldwide for hundreds and hundreds of years.

Slashdot Top Deals

The earth is like a tiny grain of sand, only much, much heavier.

Working...