Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Simpler solution... (Score 2, Insightful) 369

Professionals are paid for their time. Period. You can slice it however you want, but almost no one works piece meal. Most of those that do are VERY far down the skill ladders.

It was a nice try to slander me with accusations of working for McDonalds. Last time I checked, their POS terminals don't allow the user to initiate a web browser (or any other software).

Wether salary, or hourly, you are being paid for your time. Surely the result are what count (mostly), but there is usually an implicit agreement of a certain block of time, on certain days. If you can't abide the agreement, then you shouldn't make it. However, if you convinced someone to pay you salary, and then just do as you please, that's great. But it's not a career, kiddo.

Comment Re:And way too high an opinion of themselves (Score 1) 982

Not at all...

I enforce the rules THAT YOU MADE UP.

They aren't MY rules. They are YOUR rules.

If you don't like your own rules, then tough cookies.

An anal geek is going to follow the given rules to the
exclusion of all else. A geek's job is to make sure that
stuff stays running. He's responsible for ensuring that
millions of dollars per hour is not lost due to someone
screwing up with relevant computer systems.

This "customer service" nonsense is for burger flippers at McDonalds.

This "customer service" nonsense is what causes professionalism to be discarded in favor of pandering with chaos being the end result.

Comment Re:False analogy. (Score 1) 664

from a grading point of view iv'e never seen how anyone could get anything over 100% in anything unless there is extra credit involved and its being used for individual assignments. maybe you meant that but just saying that iv'e never heard of anyone with 105%+ ESPECIALLY when they only do "pretty good" on the tests.

Comment Bill Gates is the father of linux (Score 1) 737

If Gates hadn't been stupid enough to give the order to build MS Windows on top of a crappy cutdown CP/M clone instead of on top of MS Xenix we wouldn't have needed Linux in the first place and the computers of the world would not be infested with malware beyond the dreams of science fiction. Gates had a lot of chances to get things right and missed the boat on multiple occasions. Thanks to him the "computer experience" for many is frustrating and annoying and computers are seen to be unreliable.

Comment I'll bite... (Score 1) 5

Who are you talking about? Was it someone's birthday when you posted this? I checked wikipedia for March 10th and the only easily recognized name was Chuck Norris - who turned 70 today. If he was born 60 years earlier that would make today his 130th birthday - hence born in 1880.

Although why the world would have been better for him then, I'm not sure.

Comment Re:BASIC is irrelevant (Score 1) 548

It's far better to teach beginning programmers in Pascal or Java than it is to use Perl, for example.

Could you elaborate on this point? I am not primarily a programmer; I am a networking nerd for an ISP. I have however, in the course of my duties, had to utilize a variety of programmer-like skills. I learned programming originally in perl, because it was the closest thing to shell scripting (which I generally understood enough to accomplish my goals) that met my immediate needs. I'm curious what kind of bad habits I may have inherited from my initial exposure to perl as opposed to, say pascal. Specificity would be appreciated as my goal is not to argue, but to hopefully learn and save myself some headaches...

Slashdot Top Deals

"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.

Working...