Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Undercosting much? (Score 3, Insightful) 137

oh don't be such a party pooper.

The GP has a point. The Linux desktop went nowhere. 40K desktops in Spain, 14K in Munich and 90K by the French police are by themselves respectable numbers. But when you take the perspective that:

  • -- these are the 3 biggest deployments of (desktop) Linux within the whole European Union public services,
  • -- AFAIK the only 3 very large ones,
  • -- in 2012

  one needs to reckon that, yes, we may all use Linux at home and some even at work (I do) but the Linux desktop never made it anywhere close mass market presence.

If I want to buy a high-quality laptop withOUT paying for an OS license that I am not going to use, the situation is as dire today as it was 10 years ago.

Comment Re:problems with LaTeX and e-books (Score 1) 470

What you call the bare minimum, is still -for me- leagues better than the current alternatives. At the end of the day, the Kindle gives me standard font-types with great legibility, most LaTeX produced stuff I read on my Kindle DX (PDFs fit just right) use Computer Modern fonts - which suck for screen reading.

FWIW, regarding your linked image:

1. the font size in the image you linked is too large for the screen size. Reading a novel at ~ 6 words per line is going to suck no matter what. There is a setting for displaying more words per line (without decreasing the font size), perhaps you should try that? The text seems to use the default type face, the condensed would also be better (in my eyes).

2. You are using German text on a Kindle only sold in the USA, are you surprised at the lack of hyphenation? I honestly can't remember if the Kindle does hyphenation in English or not. OK, my bad, it does not (I just checked). I use a smaller font size, so that is less of an issue.

3. Either you don't have paragraphs on that page or the book/text displayed is poorly tagged (is the 'Als Gregor Samsa' a paragraph?). I just checked 3 different books I have and they all have proper paragraph justification.

Comment Re:converting a LaTeX book to ePub format (Score 1) 470

> Looking beyond ePub, conversion to Kindle format (which unlike ePub is closed).

Once you have HTML, or EPUB (which is s subset of HTML inside a ZIP file) converting to MOBI (which is what the Kindle uses) is trivial.

Trust me. Been there, done that.

The DRM in the Kindle is closed, just like all the (different) DRMs used with ePubs.

Comment Re:problems with LaTeX and e-books (Score 1) 470

I never noticed any problem with reflow or line breaking in my Kindles. The kindle handles text novels just fine. Books with an occasional picture are not more or less of a problem than with LaTeX.

TFA seems to be about children books. In this case, picture placement is much more important. And perhaps as sentences may be shorter, strict line breaking becomes necessary, but not 'harder' (unless you reduce the number of words per line accordingly).

Comment Re:...no, really. (Score 1) 278

My laptop only gets 5 hours, but I do know that there are Intel based ones that get approximately 10. Given that Apple is using an ARM chip, it seems kind of embarrassing that they're only able to get 10 hours out of it.

Isn't it the case that tablets carry smaller batteries so as to reduce weight? Besides battery life is not everything. People have the choice between dump phones that last a month, and smart phones that last 2 days. Most pick the smart phone.

Comment Re:You know why Apple's winning? It's not about sp (Score 1) 390

I couldn't agree more.

I use Linux almost everywhere including in my last 2 phones (Androids). Like everyone that uses a platform for a while I grew fond of some goodness present in it, which make me reluctant about migrating (say, to iphone/IOS). However, one mighty selling point of the IOS platform is the continuous stream of software updates.

Google still has this completely messed up. There is no Android phone I can buy which I know I'll have future software support for it. All the Nexus phones are normally only available in the USA and England. They reach the rest of the planet much later, and often NOT as "Google experience" devices. Meaning: "NO continuous stream of software updates". For instance, the XOOM was a Google experience device IN THE US, not in Europe (at least not in most of Europe, perhaps it was in England).

Another PITA of Android are the manufacturers additions to it. I would have already bought a Samsung Galaxy S2 if it wasn't for the fact that I simply don't trust Samsung to re-write Android's user interface.

Comment Re:Hostile community (Score 1) 487

I think that the "know nothing, aggressive abrasive kids" shouting 'XYZ is cool... ABC sux... i'm elite' is a consequence of the popularity of the platform. Its is a bit like saying that the LaTeX dev groups is one of the most civil that there is (from what I heard, no direct experience). I tend to think that _part_ of the reason for it, is that LaTeX development is not the most exciting piece of software tech around.

The distros brought fragmentation to some extent, but it was mostly because of the problems (packaging) that they were tackling to solve. At the same time the BSD family had fragmentation at the kernel level, which Linux doesn't actually have.

Comment Re:When will Java be fast? Another 30 yrs? (Score 1) 90

When will Java be fast? Another 30 yrs?

I was working in a government lab in 1994-ish when Sun visited us. We were writing cross-platform C++ code - UNIX (many, many flavors including 64-bit), Windows, Mac, OS/2 ... you get the idea.

The said it was a little slow at the time, but figured in 5 yrs it would be almost as fast as native C++.

I'm still waiting. My company avoids java applications just like we avoid AIR and Flash and IE apps. It is big and slow.

Any chance Java and hence, Eclipse will ever get tight and fast in the next 30 yrs?

AFAIK Java wasn't meant to be faster than or as fast as C/C++, it was meant to be 'fast enough' (for a number of scenarios), maintanable and SAFE.

Comment Re:Quite the opposite: E-Ink breakthrough? Not yet (Score 2) 161

Plus paper books last (nearly) forever, you can give them them to kids or, if everything else fails, the nazis/communists/whatev0r can burn them.

Plus paper books take space, have fixed-size small fonts, accumulate dust, won't give me an immediate dictionary look-up, and are a royal-pain-in-the-back when you carry box loads of them when moving to a new house. Oh, 10 paper books also take too much space in my luggage when I take them during my vacations.

[...]

While one's mileage may vary, I haven't yet met a single person that reads a lot that didn't marvel at the possibilities that the e-readers offer.

Comment Re:Hey, no need to badmouth the Kindle (Score 2) 161

I don't know what economy you're living in, but I wouldn't say it's dirt cheap. Even $100 (much less than it started at) isn't dirt cheap.

For the kind of tech and convenience you get, I'd say it is dirty cheap. FWIW by convenience, I mean:
- the price of bookshelves, and the house space that is not occupied by bookshelves,
- I read a lot and my eyes are not 'eagle sharp'. Having adjustable fonts in something which is not a bright monitor is positively awesome and (for me) worth paying a lot more than $100.
- carrying loads of books while on vacation without the weight...
- etc
  Perhaps the $100 is still a lot compared to that for some, but for many I can assure you it is peanuts.

Comment Re:Angry Voters (Score 1) 255

I live in Paris (i.e. square meters cost a lot), there is no way I will pile up DVDs in the house.

Are you serious?!? Rationalize much?

Actually, yes, I am serious. But then you should not take me too literally. I meant to say, I have no basement or a big flat with spare rooms. Flat area is relatively small.

I live in Manhattan where square meters also cost a lot. I have 100 DVDs sitting in front of me. They are on a spool which is a huge 7 inches tall. Given DVDs have a diameter of 12cm and there's a bit under half an inch of spool base sticking out all round, we have a box 14.5 cm x 14.5cm x 18cm.

You don't have room for such a "pile"? You could hang it from the ceiling, taking up no square meters. I'm sure you have 15cm of shelf width somewhere in that house

The point is that I don't want to have more "stuff" in the flat. I don't want to have boxes full books that don't fit the shelves, nor stacks of DVDs, or stacks of paper. I live here ;-) I'd rather have an emptier home (*looks around*: boxes of all sorts of stuff, books piled on top of the IKEA shelve, cables running around the table). (I work remotely so I get to look around the house during working hours ;-)). Of course I could stuff it somewhere but then it would be even more "stuff" stuffed at places, and I want to avoid that as much as possible. Don't tell me to buy more storage and rip it, I already own a NAS, and I want to get rid of the last computer with a DVD drive in the house.

I donated all old books that I thought I wasn't going to read again. Unless its work related, I only buy digital books (love the Kindle). I actually donated an old printer primarily because it was not wireless and there was no good place to run the USB cable to the router or desktop (which I will hopefully get rid of).

The local video/media library has titles but not that many. We (me+wife) buy DVDs when we really want to see something. My whole point is that the media industry puts so much money and effort to get these laws passed, but they don't really work to take the money from people like me who can afford it but really needs/wants it with 'digital convenience'.

Slashdot Top Deals

To thine own self be true. (If not that, at least make some money.)

Working...