Comment Re:That's all? (Score 1) 6
It's another big, happy circle-jerk a la chemtrails.
It's another big, happy circle-jerk a la chemtrails.
98% of the functionality of these apps could have been done in a web page in '98.
Pretend for just a moment that we're not talking about an argument's logical or ethical impact, or even the effects of charisma.
Pretend instead that we're talking about gaming the system.
Why should corporate shills get all the good times? Those in the public sector deserve their fair share.
Use ——and you'll be golden.
Here ya go, buddy.
Dingdingdingding... We have a winner. Alas, I'm fresh out of mod points today.
Comparing genocide with doing business? Only on the Internet!
You seem to have missed the fact that it was the MS point man who invited the comparisons with the WW2 era to begin with.
Nice try, though.
With a monopoly everybody know where they stand. You either with them - or against them. And if the monopolist is really bad, then opposition would form in the industry.
Duopoly creates illusion of competition.
Oh, you mean like the REPUBLICANS and the DEMOCRATS? Now I get it---Thanks!
The original was just fine. Don't quit your day job.
It sure has. Ten years ago, I actually still used Windows. About 6 months after that, I switched to Linux, and since then, I mostly get to ignore Microsoft and its scabby products. And when work obliges me to test something on Windows, it's in a VM.
MY principal beef with Microsoft is their incredible "we already know what's best for you" arrogance and their chronic inability to discern that a computer I've bought and paid for with my own money is MY computer and not theirs. When that attitude changes, you might see mine do so also. In the meantime, I am grateful to FOSS for making it possible mostly just to ignore them.
See $subject.
Not after the resistance got the informal tour of Disneyland Kiev over the weekend.
Oh, there's some other "resistance" that's worth paying attention to recently?
Good to see that somebody's sarcasm detector is actually functional, I guess.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh