He certainly is using someone else's creation
Where does standing on shoulders of giants (as Bernard of Chartres put it) end and misappropriation begin? Where should it?
users should be able to legitimately watch content from anywhere in the world at any time
Does "anywhere" include on a city bus? What I'd like to be officially able to do is queue up some 1- to 10-minute videos to watch, download them (possibly using encryption) while connected to the Internet, disconnect, and watch them. Even if offline viewing were restricted to 360p, that'd still be better than having to pay hundreds of USD per year for cellular Internet for my Nexus 7 tablet.
You realise the Internet is not a broadcast medium, right?
Whose fault is it that IP multicast over the public Internet remains unimplemented?
[People who bought a GNU/Linux netbook tended to be unsatisfied] because they didn't know how to use Linux. They'd buy the machine, get it home, unbox it, boot up, then suddenly ask 'What the hell is this crap?' and 'Why can't I install my software?'.
Unfamiliarity with the GUI didn't stop people from taking to the iPad. The reason has to be more subtle.
Sorry, but if it's not directly built in as a user accessable option, then who cares if the hooks are there.
There is a user-accessible option to open Internet Explorer, type windows 8 classic shell into the Bing search box (which produces this SERP), and click the first result. Or is your complaint that Microsoft provides no means to discover that such a classic shell exists in the first place? If that's true, then the same is true of obscure registry settings that do exist in Windows, and it's true of the existence of web browsers other than IE.
Speaking of IE, Microsoft got in trouble with competition law for including things with Windows. I'm guessing this is why Microsoft declined to ship MSE bundled with Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Windows 7 so as not to be perceived as using its Windows market power to gain antivirus market power.
If they'd included a classic shell
Microsoft did one better by providing hooks for third party developers to create classic shells for Windows 8. I know of at least two classic shells, one of which is actually called Classic Shell.
A method of disabling Secure Boot is required by the spec and by Microsoft.
In Windows 8 (x86 and x86-64), it is required. In Windows RT, it is forbidden. And other comments to this topic speculate that Microsoft is likely to license Windows 10 like Windows RT in this respect.
What if the reader doesn't think that using fictional characters should result in someone getting punished?
Until 51 percent of readers agree with this hypothetical reader and take this agreement to the voting booth, copyright continues to exist as the statius quo.
the whole "can't copyright essential game elements, only expressive artwork" deal
Tell that to Xio Software, who got successfully sued by The Tetris Company for making a block-stacking game that uses pieces made of four square blocks.
How is it "bribing" a player to give them money so in return you have their permission to use their likeness?
That depends on whether accepting such a "bribe" would cost a student athlete his amateur status and thus his eligibility.
With your bare hands?!?