Yeah, that's not what's happening at all.

In a manner of speaking. The actual meaning of the words is completely irrelevant.

Hear, hear!

Some people are sensitive to light. I have the brightness on my phone turned almost all the way down. People ask me why the screen is so dim, but it looks awful bright to me.

Oddly enough, the iPhone has the best accessibility solution for blind and visual impaired users on the market.

I don't know how that happened either. It must have been an oversight.

Pure hubris.

Intelligence has absolutely nothing to do with it. Neither on the believes side (you'll find brilliant religious people not only throughout history, but in the present day) nor on the atheist side (look no farther than slashdot for some of the thickest atheists the internet has ever seen.)

There are religions that lack supernatural components, you know. Perhaps you don't?

I think that's his point.

What on earth are you talking about? Slashdot users are all but universally Atheist. The bulk of them aren't terribly competent, of course, but that's the kind that guarantee up mods for saying simple thinks like "religious people are dumb" or "ghosts don't exist".

Now, if you REALLY want to hit that +5, make a "scientific" claim that appeals to Atheists but has no actual scientific foundation or that is outside the scope of science. For example, you could say "Science has disproved the god hypothesis" and the scientifically illiterate majority of Slashdot users will immediate mod your post up.

Failing that, just repeat empty rhetoric that you heard from the less-than-competent during the Dover trial. That appears to be your approach:

It's sad, really.

RT was Microsoft's attempt at playing Apple and getting total control over (and a keen 30% of) the market for Windows software. It will kill RT.

What Blamer doesn't realizes is that people won't put up with that sort of nonsense from any company except for Apple. They are the only exception.

Had they allowed anyone to develop and distribute RT software, it might have had a fighting chance.

Thank you!

It's true. Most people don't care about the OS. They're buying a tablet for internet and games.

Still, even for those of us that do care, I'd happily buy a competitively priced tablet from Microsoft if it ran whatever Windows software I wanted -- and had a real stylus.

If they can get something like the Surface Pro 2 down to around $300-$400, which is really only a matter of time, I don't see why they couldn't grab a good share. Add a few other players with their own hardware and I can see Microsoft really taking over the tablet market.

That would be fantastic, but it seems pretty unrealistic at this point.

Oh, HP ... Why do you get all your CEO's from the Smile Time employment center for special needs adults?

Or you could just look at the smudges on the screen. Google will tell you all about that.

Exactly, most of us figured out years ago that the NWO shadow government are mere puppets controlled by the lizard men in the hollow earth. That's who they, and Apple, really fear.

They're the reason that TouchID was hacked so easily. The version Apple though they were manufacturing was secretly replaced while in transit. They're all a bunch of Android fanboys, after all.

Conspiracy time. Okay.

So ... what would convince you? A few independent reproductions? Those could be faked the same way!

Apple admitting that the hack works? Just PR to save face / get people to stop talking about it. It's really super secure like they said earlier!

Trying the hack yourself? Perhaps you're in on the conspiracy as well -- and you don't even know it!

That's "latex milk", which is not the same as milk and latex.

The article also suggests that they used white wood glue, which people are more likely to have around the house. (Adding a bit of glycerin to the glue seems to be an optional step.)