Isn't there such a thing as fair use.
No, not for trademarks. You are thinking of copyright, which has nothing to do with this dispute.
This is false. Descriptive and nominative fair use are well-established defenses to trademark infringement. A defendant may also assert parody and other 1st Amendment-based defenses. See, for example, Mattel's failed suit against the band who sang "Barbie Girl".
Trademarks are for branding in written content, not spoken.
This is false. A trademark can be anything that is source-identifying for goods or services. It can be a color (see "UPS brown"), a scent (see the "flowery musk scent" of Verizon stores (ew)), or, yes, a sound (see the "Intel inside" chimes). Here's a whole page the USPTO dedicated to sound marks.
The phrase, "choose your own adventure" is not trademarked because that is impossible.
This is also false. It's not just possible to trademark phrases, Chooseco has held a registered US trademark for the CHOOSE YOUR OWN ADVENTURE word mark in books since 2004.
Tweens and headcases.
Humans have been rehashing the same stories for 4,000 years and you suckers still eat it up.
FTFY
If state-owned companies are a thing of threats...
Bob Readerman of the New York Times raves: "James Patterson's A Thing of Threats is a riveting delve into the seedy underworld of state-owned companies. My buttcheeks literally did not unclench once as this gripping thriller wove its way through not one, not two, but—spoilers!—a whole thing of threats!! 5/5 - instant best seller and surprisingly effective glute workout."
The content of, and presentation style, reminded me more of an ad than some news article.
Yeah, and a pretty tone-deaf one at that. Guess what, Aegon Retirement Readiness Survey 2018? Not all of us have a barcalounger made from the dragonfire-melted swords of a thousand vanquished enemies to retire to, you insensitive clods!
That's not what's going on.
Kim and his advisers came to the conclusion that Trump and his advisers were looking for an occasion for a limited war - some bombing campaign - somewhere in the world. Ideally, the campaign would take place before the mid term elections. The US military was tasked to look into either bombing some nuclear facilities in NK or bombing some nuclear facilities in Iran. Kim and his advisers came to this conclusion and quickly contacted SK to prevent this from happening, because they know very well that the NK could not possibly defend their territory at all and judge that Trump is crazy enough to not care about possible consequences for South Korea.
Every indication has been that, while outwardly belligerent and inwardly ruthless, the Kim regime is eminently logical with regard to its own survival and self-interest.
The scenario you dreamed up is beyond absurd, and relies on a deeply flawed understanding of Kim as some sort of delusional paranoiac. Kim isn't Brando with a death cult holed up in the jungle. He knows that scenario wasn't going to happen, just as every other sane person on the planet knows it wasn't going to happen.
It would be hard for me to think less of Trump than I already do, and there's still nothing you could say to convince me that he'd start WWIII and get a couple hundred thousand (or more) South Koreans killed by launching some meaningless sortie to get a midterm election boost.
I guess if you really want to use a cloud service such as google drive, you'll want to use an app that encrypts and changes to numeric filenames.
I can see the headlines now: "Tech Site Solves Dirty Download Dillemma, Advises Pornographers to Zip It Up"
"Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch." -- Robert Orben
