Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:save us from *all* pseudo-science (Score 1) 674

As Sagan so eloquently put it "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence".

If I'm trying to support a claim that is 80% extraordinary, does my evidence have to be 80% extraordinary too, or can I get by with two pieces of 40% extraordinary evidence? I mean, Sagan's statement is a nice sentiment and makes a great sound bite, and all, but the moment you start judging the ordinariness or extraordinariness of claims and evidence you start to stumble off the path of science. Science is simple: Either the evidence supports the claim or it doesn't. That's all that should matter.

Comment Re:My sky bully could kick your sky bully's ass... (Score 1) 674

The basic idea behind science is pretty simple: prove it or it isn't real.

Nonsense. That's not how science works. The basic idea behind science is that if an observation contradicts a conjecture, then the conjecture is false. That's it. If the observations do not contradict the conjecture, science makes no claim.

Comment Re:Cause and effect reversed. (Score 1) 199

You're missing the point. The constitution is defended with the ballot box, not the ammo box. By the time you're defending the constitution with guns, you've already lost. At that point, it's time to revert to the Declaration of Independence "...whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."

Comment Re:Guns...Lots Of Guns (Score 1) 199

He's talking about the American Revolution. His coy act is obnoxious, but your deliberate obtuseness is annoying, too.

I am not an American, so if there is some American cultural reference linking "one single event" and the American Revolution, you'll have to forgive me for not picking up on the hint. Besides, the American revolution is not an example of the US government changing its policies because the US population is armed because there was no US, or US government, or US population (armed or otherwise) at the time.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...