Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Maybe (Score 4, Insightful) 365

One out of three people decided they looked like a dork with that awful thing on their wrist.

All the makings of a future collector's item! Anybody who has one and is thinking of returning it, place it back in the original box and stow it away. A whole new generation of nostalgia geeks is being born right now who will beat a path to your door about the time you need retirement money.

Comment Re:brace yourself (Score 4, Insightful) 453

brace yourself for 1000+ angry comments

No doubt.

Thing is, everybody does not need to be taught coding, but they really should be at least shown how to use a computer. In the same manner that everybody does not need a mandatory engine building class, though driver's education would be nice along with the basics on how to maintain an automobile. Even that is not mandatory in these parts.

Comment Re:Deregulated = Monopolies? (Score 1) 569

Banks were deregulated, and massive consolidation followed. Same with phone companies, and media companies. The less regulation, the fewer choices.

ATT was a national monopoly only until the feds allowed competition.

ATT was a competing company until the government outlawed competition. In the early 1900s, companies would have multiple phones from multiple companies because Bob might have one company and Alice a different one, and they couldn't call each other, and couldn't call a business unless that business bought lines from both companies. That silliness is why competition was outlawed. Then later mandated.

That "silliness" did not need to be "outlawed" at all any more than any other marketplace problem needs outlawing. You know, like that "silliness" between file formats, etc.

Comment Deregulated = Monopolies? (Score 5, Insightful) 569

1. Where I live we do have choice between carriers, and it is not even a big city. 2. When I was in a densely populated area, Northern VA, we had choice too. Deregulation to allow competition causes monopolies? No, does not compute. Regulation creates barriers to entry that leans to monopolies or few providers, those who can get the government to protect their territory with police power. ATT was a national monopoly only until the feds allowed competition. Your local utility is only a monopoly as long as your local government makes them one, same with your cable provider, etc.

Comment Re:Who gives a shit? (Score 2, Informative) 200

It is South Korea. If you have a culture that will fuck up safety certificates at nuclear plants, do you think they are suddenly going to be better with natural gas plants?

Fix the fucking culture and kill the corruption. The technology was never the problem.

Do you think they have a monopoly on that culture? Witness our very own government owned and operated Tennessee Valley Authority and they falsified readings of wells around the coal slurry dam. Oh, they do it with nuclear too.

Comment Why all of this surprise? (Score 4, Insightful) 215

From these "world leaders" to journalists, why all of the 'surprise?' Spying is one of the things that governments do, ALL of them. They ALL spy on their allies and foes alike and it has always been this way. In the US/Israel context, we both spy on each other all day, every day, and assist with information on other countries too. France does the same thing, so does England. Nothing new here.

Comment Re:Not Fair (Score 1) 264

The point is, people are voting with their money. It may be nice to hang out at a bookstore, but the combination of lower price, vastly greater selection (as in 1000 times greater), and convenience of shopping from home obviously wins out. One justification for keeping the physical stores around Paris might be tourism but when you put it that way - i.e they are charging the taxpayers to decorate the city with bookstores - it does seem kinda silly. It's really just a preference of the ruling elite. They don't care that the books will cost more to the poor people, they are more interested in how the city looks. Just like in certain highly expensive, highly liberal, neighborhoods of San Francisco, New York etc they banned chain restaurants thereby drastically raising the average price of eating out, but it makes it nicer for the rich people to walk around without all those poor people blocking the sidewalk.

Just like "urban renewal" and its destruction of affordable housing. What you wind up with is a neighborhood full of pretentious prissies who got their condos and luxury apartments at a taxpayer provided discount. Just so happens that the discount is not big enough for the people who used to be able to live there.

Comment Re:Science isn't just confirming what you know (Score 1) 640

More proof that the AGW movement is a cult. Real scientists would do the investigation o learn more about climate change, not shrink away from it just because it upsets their insular worldview.

I would have a lot more respect for "not wanting to be political pawns" if they had not already chosen a side of the board.

If the existing data used to base the current conclusions were open to all, you might have more independent scientists investigating this too.

Comment Re:Not Fair (Score 1) 264

When regional players cannot compete even with taxpayer support (as these french bookstores are), then they should go out of business. Who says brick and mortar bookstores need to exist and we all need to pay higher prices for books in order to keep then artificially alive?

Dirt-world stores do have an advantage that they seem to miss. One can pick up and look at a book in person before buying it, for example. The dust jacket can be a work of art, like the ones from Chip Kidd at Knopf, that you cannot get, and never will get on any existing digital device. Where they fall on their face is in some of their policies that worked fine a century ago, but are completely outdated now. Like demanding to returning unsold stock to the publishers.

On that last one, just think about it if you are a writer or publisher. If you have a choice between a sale being final and someone "buying" your product for three months, then shipping it back to you because they don't want it anymore, which do you choose? On eBooks, I believe Amazon Kindle gives that opportunity to the consumer, that few or no dirt-world bookstores offer, but the writer is not killed with storage fees or remainders. Not sure if they give it on physical books.

As a consumer, it is really none of my business what the seller's underlying costs are, I care about the quality of the product and the price. That is unless the government is giving the seller some of my tax money to pretend that his product is a little cheaper.

Slashdot Top Deals

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...