Comment Re:Ya, but (Score 1) 93
Never wanted to see the money shot in reverse?
Never wanted to see the money shot in reverse?
Ok, admit it, who let the door open? You know that all sorts of riffraff will come in, look, this time it was a priest.
What exactly is harmful about drawn pictures (because last time I checked, the kind of anatomy depicted in animes or mangas is
What? My mother was a saint!
Easier said than done, one should think it's not that hard considering how many there are, but when you need one to hug...
>" Google did not outline a more specific timetable beyond hoping for 2025."
Meanwhile, Firefox ended 3rd party cookies (by default) more than 4.5 years ago.
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/pr...
Why? Because they actually *do* care about privacy (and security, and choice, and open standards). And unlike Chrom*/Google, they don't have a major conflict of interest about it.
to patch the metastasis out of the system and actually own it?
I have experienced it first hand. Never again.
That is exactly what this is. An Ad platform. They are just trying to disguise it with a little content.
Not on my phone, no way.
Just because people are useless they won't lie down and die quietly.
Twice so in a country that has more guns than people.
I'll sign it without hesitation. Non-competes are illegal in my jurisdiction, and illegal clauses in contracts are void.
Startups around here get hoovered up including the former owners as "consultants". Basically that means you get money for doing nothing, at least as long as you don't try to start a competitor because guess what "consultation" is no longer needed should you try that...
C'mon. Please. When has the free market ever tied the hands of corporations? If that ever happens (and yes, there is indeed that nonzero chance that we're heading into an employer market, at least in some fields), rest assured that the game will be rigged some more in your disadvantage.
The only reason that corporations were fine with government letting "the market" sort it out was that until now, they had you by the balls. Let's wait what's gonna happen should this change.
Here's the thing, though: I am needed. But unfortunately, I'm one of the few.
But that's besides the point. What matters is that the replacement rate of young people vs. old people is only at about 80%. And that's not gonna change in the near future. For every 5 people leaving the workforce, only 4 will join it. Save immigration, of course, but let's face it, you only need so many goat-herders...
And that's the point. It's not just the burger flippers and shelf stockers that retire. It's also the researchers and doctors, the finance gurus and the engineers. Yes, there has never been a shortage of unskilled idiots. And that shortage sure isn't in any danger of growing, considering that the bar to enter the workforce sure rises yet again with AI taking over more and more unskilled jobs. So I don't fear for the low level jobs that they may go unfilled.
What I fear is that high level, senior positions will be hard to fill. For two reasons: First, the aforementioned 80% replacement rate. But even with 100% replacement rate, if we replace our juniors with AI, where should they get the experience to become those hard to find and highly sought seniors?
How about this one?
You don't consider it serious that you're essentially indentured servants of corporations and that they can easily circumvent due process and force you into settling on their terms?
O... kay...
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.