Comment Re:I like the idea (Score 1) 157
A car is a tool to move people and stuff from A to B, and without fuel, it ceases to fulfill its promise, on which it was sold.
A car is a tool to move people and stuff from A to B, and without fuel, it ceases to fulfill its promise, on which it was sold.
I read an interview with one of the main protestors that got fired in the first wave. Their plan is to become a professional protestor. I suspect that pays better than being an average Googler.
Maybe some reversible nuclear process, if that is even feasible.
If we don't manage to use electricity to merge neutron stars, it's probably not feasible. Until then it's like making gold from lead by nuclear processes: doable, but the price per atom is not market compatible.
Within the framework of the Constitution itself, Congress is king. They can override a veto by the Executive and remove them from office if they so choose. For the context we were speaking, tax and spend, Congress has effective unlimited authority if they so choose to use it.
Names of bills don't mean shit, they never have. Trying to tie anything to what politicians *name* a bill is pointless and childish. (Hello "Patriot Act").
Inflation hasn't gone down because people are still spending, raised prices or not. Talk is cheap, actions are what matter. People bitch up a storm that fast food prices (for example) are thru the roof (they are), but they're doing it while buying enough fast food the companies are making record profits.
And it isn't just essentials that are absolutely required, but everything. Prices will go back down when people start taking more action and stop spending.
It doesn't work that way. Everything works because people follow the basic rules -- the Constitution itself. Amending the Constitution itself isn't a simple vote of Congress, much less something signed by a President into law. There's an explicit process.
Your question is akin in seriousness to "what if EVERYONE just stopped paying taxes".
They didn't. They went up variable amounts, often higher, depending on what they were. And those prices went up YEARS before this legislation was passed, so the link you're implying is imaginary.
Unless SCOTUS officially rules "Unconstitutional", essentially. That's the check and balance we have.
You seem to have a problem understand the word "over". It isn't a lump sum at the end of the decade, it is accumulated over the 10-year period -- like like the spend.
Congress and their powers to tax and spend in general. That doesn't vary by specific technologies like solar vs oil, etc.
Not free, paid for by large corporations. The Inflation Reduction Act raises $300 billion over a decade by requiring large corporations to pay a 15 percent minimum tax on their profits and by enacting a 1 percent excise tax on stock buybacks and redemptions.
New York... when civilization falls apart, remember, we were way ahead of you. - David Letterman