Yes, but he's not agreeing with the summary, is he ? I knew reading comprehension on this site had declined, but I was hopeful it wasn't as bad as this...
Here's how it works.
1) A story is posted
2) Comments are made
3) Each comment can have a hierarchy of sub-comments. The text of any given comment is relative to its parent.
Just like this comment, calling your statement [the parent comment to this one] idiotic.
He was agreeing with his parent's comment, which is (rightly, IMHO) pointing out that Apple is actually going out of their way to make a fix they'd made (and QA'd with their hardware to work perfectly) *also* work with the non-Apple third-party hardware. This is Apple going above and beyond, and if you can't see that, well, that's more a problem with you than anything else.
And the douchebag that wrote the original clickbait, of course.