Comment Re:We shouldn't ban 'things' but uses (Score 1) 380
You unintentionally expose a great proof for the concept that enabling us to exercise freedom is not the agenda of this kind of legislation.
Banning ownership of specific 'things' is enforceable across the board, which is the appeal. Even though it overreaches into legitimate uses, politicians haven't been finding that a concern. But they should. We never gave them the authority to pass legislation which encroaches upon our rights. However, this now happens routinely today.
Now if only there were some cryptic clue as to their actual agenda. Because it certainly isn't upholding our rights.