Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Hydro (Score 1) 59

Solar farms have high transmission losses, though, as they are not located near residences.

No, they don't. Coal and nuclear plants aren't located near residences either, but we still lose under 5% in transmission in the USA. The losses are higher than local, but not anything you could reasonably call "high".

Comment Re: Oil companies are scum (Score 1) 74

False. I need to change too, but the whole system is set up to make that inconvenient, so I require systemic change before I will be able to do so. For example, I cannot stress enough how much I want to switch every vehicle in our little fleet over to electric, but it's practical for 0 of the vehicles for me right now. I can't charge them, I can't afford them, etc etc.

Comment Re: Is China covered by the US constitution? (Score 1) 154

I mean if we just don't believe in the institutions anymore why would we even care about what the Founders thought or would think?

I care because I want to look critically at what they did and use the parts that make sense, and I want to know what they thought about both those parts as well as the other parts so I can more easily learn from it. Not enough to spend a lot of time reading about it, though, so obviously I don't care personally and only in principle. Every so often I go off on a tear about some particular subject and learn about what they thought about that, but it's not a hobby.

What matters more than what they did is what we need to do now. This is a different time. We should probably do many things differently. This first past the post voting thing is bananas, as is the undemocratic system of not counting our votes for president individually.

Comment Re: Lazy B (Score 1) 109

Union can't protect workers who don't follow safety standards. That tells us that nobody was checking up to make sure they did because it might affect the bottom line, which in turn tells us it was management's fault and had nothing at all to do with any unions.

We already knew this because of all the cost cutting crap Boing has done over the years. Notably, they shifted a lot of production to contractors on whom they never checked up.

Comment Re: But arguably not a security risk (Score 1) 154

"forbidding it to everybody is clearly not a matter of national security. If it was, they would forbid ALL actors (e.g. facebook, google etc...) to gather data and sell it to everybody which, they do."

All national social media services are known to be part of PRISM. They are literally part of the panopticon. Therefore they are essentially defense contractors. What they sell and to whom is probably under a lot more scrutiny than you think. Anyone buying that data and trusting it to be accurate is as dumb as those who believe that Facebook targets their advertising accurately. That is to say, spectacularly.

Comment Re: Is China covered by the US constitution? (Score 1) 154

It doesn't have to say it anywhere in practice. What matters is what has been done historically, we call that precedent.

The precedent is for the 1A to apply to humans everywhere, but only to US corporations.

There is ample precedent for doing basically anything in the name of national security as well, so good luck with your argument. Normally you're not even allowed to know about it (See: National Security Letters - wait, you don't GET to see those...)

Comment Re:Free speech issue - but not the one you think (Score 1) 154

When the Constitution was written it inconceivable to have a communications platform like Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, etc.

Newspapers and book publishers existed when the Constitution was written. Neither is under any obligation to print your letter to the editor or book, respectively.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Plastic gun. Ingenious. More coffee, please." -- The Phantom comics

Working...