It's actually correct to call it a treaty. The link points to a memo, which supplement Ukraine's accession to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. To read the treaty would also cover reading the memos supplementing it. To link to a memo whose sole purpose is to supplement a treaty and use that particular word as the link's text content seems only logical to me.

But yes, it's just a collection of nice words that whole memo/treaty/agreement.

I first read they're "going to fuel rockets with people abroad".

Extremely hard. Like AHuxley there pointed out, the emails are signed by domain keys and you and me, and everybody else, can validate the authenticity and integrity of every email that has the DKIM. To say that they would have forged an email in a way that still validates through a DKIM validator, WikiLeaks (or some other party) would've had to have stolen Google's and other domains' private DKIM keys. Mind you that these keys are *extremely* well protected, especially on Google's services.

That being said, to say that Podesta's emails have been forged, you would have to simultaneously argue that *every* email sent from e.g. Google's email servers are potentially forged or subject to forgery right now. If Google, for example, believed this to be true, they'd be changing their keys right now.

Out of curiosity, what are you using for centralized management?

Of course, and that's what warrants FBI's involvement.

Indeed. He seems to have sent "illicit messages" to a 15-year-old girl. The FBI has reportedly confiscated both Abedin's and Weiner's phones and this is how they came to know about more possible evidence in the Hillary Clinton email case.

Here in Europe companies, especially major ones, generally stay out of politics. They endorse certain policies, but stop short of endorsing politicians or parties. It's a good approach that keeps employees and customers happy, since they represent a wide range of ideologies and backgrounds. Having the media and corporations so strongly divided into opposing camps only degrades the quality politics and surrounding conversations.

Now there's a rotten story that never stops smelling. I suppose they are/were both "strong personas" that had a temper tantrum and the other one ragequit. Assange has his personality problems too, but deleting the information they possibly had was a loss for everyone.

I noticed this too. Practically every story related to the WikiLeaks email dump has been recently flagged as 'SPAM', and quite fast, too. Some of the editors here may not want to flame up the discussion too much. Either that or they have personal preferences, which are showing in their moderation (judging from their Twitter feeds this is possible, too).

Nonetheless, there are some very interesting tech related stuff in there, which would normally easily pass the Firehose here.