It's actually correct to call it a treaty. The link points to a memo, which supplement Ukraine's accession to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. To read the treaty would also cover reading the memos supplementing it. To link to a memo whose sole purpose is to supplement a treaty and use that particular word as the link's text content seems only logical to me.

But yes, it's just a collection of nice words that whole memo/treaty/agreement.

I first read they're "going to fuel rockets with people abroad".

Extremely hard. Like AHuxley there pointed out, the emails are signed by domain keys and you and me, and everybody else, can validate the authenticity and integrity of every email that has the DKIM. To say that they would have forged an email in a way that still validates through a DKIM validator, WikiLeaks (or some other party) would've had to have stolen Google's and other domains' private DKIM keys. Mind you that these keys are *extremely* well protected, especially on Google's services.

That being said, to say that Podesta's emails have been forged, you would have to simultaneously argue that *every* email sent from e.g. Google's email servers are potentially forged or subject to forgery right now. If Google, for example, believed this to be true, they'd be changing their keys right now.

Out of curiosity, what are you using for centralized management?

Of course, and that's what warrants FBI's involvement.

Indeed. He seems to have sent "illicit messages" to a 15-year-old girl. The FBI has reportedly confiscated both Abedin's and Weiner's phones and this is how they came to know about more possible evidence in the Hillary Clinton email case.

Here in Europe companies, especially major ones, generally stay out of politics. They endorse certain policies, but stop short of endorsing politicians or parties. It's a good approach that keeps employees and customers happy, since they represent a wide range of ideologies and backgrounds. Having the media and corporations so strongly divided into opposing camps only degrades the quality politics and surrounding conversations.

Now there's a rotten story that never stops smelling. I suppose they are/were both "strong personas" that had a temper tantrum and the other one ragequit. Assange has his personality problems too, but deleting the information they possibly had was a loss for everyone.

I noticed this too. Practically every story related to the WikiLeaks email dump has been recently flagged as 'SPAM', and quite fast, too. Some of the editors here may not want to flame up the discussion too much. Either that or they have personal preferences, which are showing in their moderation (judging from their Twitter feeds this is possible, too).

Nonetheless, there are some very interesting tech related stuff in there, which would normally easily pass the Firehose here.

It's quite unethical for them to jump in on one candidate's bandwagon, but there seems to be -- at least not yet -- no evidence of actions taken based on this. It does, however, make you wonder what a candidate could do if they had access to statistical data from Facebook and/or Whatsapp. And maybe even *gulp* Google's private stashes of statistics.

Whenever I see this, I have to say: conspiracy theories are theories only as long as they're not proven to be true. Granted, the OP's assumption that the "media is trying to hide serious corruption" is too wide to be ever really proven to be true, but if it was narrowed down to for example, "some of the major media outlets have been conspiring with...", then it could be shown to be true.

We know, after all, that Mrs. Clinton did receive debate questions beforehand, which alone would satisfy this. However, there have been media outlets that have reported it, which means that in the form OP mentioned it, the "conspiracy" would not be true. The latter would.

These attempts at character assassination have been pretty damn thoroughly debunked by Wikileaks. There's also a very interesting Reddit thread going on that links the paedophilia allegations to this guy, who also happens to be helping out Hillary Clinton.

You can start measuring them in cubic inches now. :-)

It's not just a few CAs, it's the whole system. The CA system is built on trust and there has been no trust left in the system in years. The whole idea of encrypted communications between web browsers and web servers needs to be reworked and somehow decentralized so that rogue CAs will eventually die out.