Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Third-party doctrine in action. (Score 1) 35

Why is anyone surprised by this? Law enforcement in the US has long held the belief that they don't need a warrant if the information about you is held by a third party. It's not surprising at all that the free market found a way to earn a few bucks to speed up a process that was going to happen anyways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Submission + - SPAM: Sony is using the courts to censor major DNS resolvers

ChrisKnight writes: In the unwinnable war against content sharing, Sony has chosen an unusual target for their latest attacks. Rather than going after hosts, or in this case sites that link to hosts, they are going after a public DNS resolver in an effort to force them to block the recursive resolution of specific domains. While Google and Cloudflare are the more widely used public resolver services, and therefore the more appropriate targets, Sony has chosen to go after the small non-profit Quad9. Sony knew Quad9 didn't have the legal resources of Google, and if they could set precedent in this case they would have traction when they take the fight to the larger players. If this precedent is allowed to stand, that a company or government can demand that specific domains be blocked at the DNS level, the free and open internet is in for a bumpy ride.
Link to Original Source

Submission + - Bank may go bust due to FTX collapse (cnn.com)

smooth wombat writes: Late Wednesday night, Silvergate Capital informed the SEC it won't be able to file its annual report on time, and is determining if it can continue to operate. Unlike most traditional banks which have steered clear of crypto, Silvergate is a dominant lender to the crypto industry.

The La Jolla, Califorina-based bank reported a $1 billion loss for the fourth quarter as investors panicked over the collapse of FTX, the exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried that is now at the center of a massive federal fraud investigation.

FTX’s collapse in November rippled through the digital asset sector, forcing several firms to halt operations and even declare bankruptcy as liquidity dried up and investors fled.

But unlike FTX, BlockFi, Celsius, Voyager and other crypto companies that folded last year, Silvergate is a traditional, federally insured lender that has positioned itself as a gateway to the crypto sector.

Submission + - You Are Not a Parrot (nymag.com) 2

jimminy_cricket writes: And a chatbot is not a human. And a linguist named Emily M. Bender is very worried what will happen when we forget this.

Bender is a computational linguist at the University of Washington. She published the paper in 2020 with fellow computational linguist Alexander Koller. The goal was to illustrate what large language models, or LLMs — the technology behind chatbots like ChatGPT — can and cannot do. The setup is this:

Say that A and B, both fluent speakers of English, are independently stranded on two uninhabited islands. They soon discover that previous visitors to these islands have left behind telegraphs and that they can communicate with each other via an underwater cable. A and B start happily typing messages to each other.

Meanwhile, O, a hyperintelligent deep-sea octopus who is unable to visit or observe the two islands, discovers a way to tap into the underwater cable and listen in on A and B's conversations. O knows nothing about English initially but is very good at detecting statistical patterns. Over time, O learns to predict with great accuracy how B will respond to each of A's utterances.

Soon, the octopus enters the conversation and starts impersonating B and replying to A. This ruse works for a while, and A believes that O communicates as both she and B do — with meaning and intent. Then one day A calls out: "I'm being attacked by an angry bear. Help me figure out how to defend myself. I’ve got some sticks." The octopus, impersonating B, fails to help. How could it succeed? The octopus has no referents, no idea what bears or sticks are. No way to give relevant instructions, like to go grab some coconuts and rope and build a catapult. A is in trouble and feels duped. The octopus is exposed as a fraud.

Submission + - White House Releases National Cybersecurity Strategy (securityweek.com)

wiredmikey writes: The U.S. government released its widely anticipated National Cybersecurity Strategy on Tuesday, pushing mandatory regulation on critical infrastructure vendors and green-lighting a more aggressive ‘hack-back’ approach to dealing with foreign adversaries and ransomware actors. The federal government plans to use existing authorities to set “necessary cybersecurity requirements in critical sectors” and where there are legal gaps around authority, the White House plans to work with Congress to close them.

The strategy document (PDF) goes deeper, assigning the work to the FBI’s National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force working in tandem with all relevant U.S. agencies. It said private companies will be “full partners” to issue early warnings and help repel cyberattacks.

Submission + - Fake DMCA takedowns blocking journalists' stories (bbc.co.uk) 2

Bruce66423 writes: 'Journalists have been forced to temporarily take down articles critical of powerful oil lobbyists due to the exploitation of US copyright law, according to a new report.

'At least five such articles have been subject to fake copyright claims, including one by the respected South African newspaper Mail & Guardian, according to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP).

'The claims — which falsely assert ownership of the stories — have been made by mystery individuals under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a law meant to protect copyright holders.'

Time for some intermediary to be required to have skin in the game so that when a takedown is shown to be false, the intermediary gets smacked? Or all DMCA notices to be issued by real people on behalf of organisations whose beneficial ownership is known?

Submission + - SPAM: ULA about to be sold?

schwit1 writes: According to anonymous sources cited by Eric Berger at Ars Technica today, the rocket company ULA may be sold by the end of this year.

The potential sale has not been disclosed publicly, but three sources confirmed to Ars that potential buyers have been contacted about the opportunity. These sources said a deal is expected to be closed before the end of this year and that investment firm Morgan Stanley and consulting firm Bain Company are managing the transaction.

Berger correctly lists either Lockheed Martin or Boeing as the most likely candidates to purchase the company, simply by buying out their partner in the consortium. Both companies have strong reasons to obtain this company after the Vulcan rocket is flying. Boeing's future building SLS is questionable, especially once Starship/Superheavy becomes operational. Lockheed Martin meanwhile has been very carefully moving into the new industry, investing heavily in the rocket startups ABL and Rocket Lab. It might want to own outright ULA, so it can better manage it.

Berger also speculates that Amazon or Blue Origin might be bidders as well. Somehow I doubt any company associated with Jeff Bezos will buy ULA, since he already has his own plaything in Blue Origin. Stranger things however have happened.

Either way, once Vulcan flies successfully it will then be a perfect time to put it up for sale, and others to buy it. The uncertainty will be reduced, and ULA will no longer be saddled with two rocket families, Delta and Atlas-5, both of which are expensive and non-competitive. Instead, it will have solid launch contracts with Amazon and the military, using Vulcan.

Such a sale will obviously also force major changes at ULA, possibly for the better. At such times the new management often uses the change as an opportunity to clean out deadwood as well as force major shifts in thinking.

Link to Original Source

Comment Aliases over Stories, any day. (Score 2) 41

> "The short answer is that people want [stories]," Whittaker told Axios

Yeah, nah. I'd much rather have a username/handle/alias that I can give someone to reach me on Signal. My one gripe is that I have to expose my real phone number to someone to be even able to use Signal to communicate with them. Can we get that before they start wasting engineering effort cloning fad features?

Comment Re:Boo hoo. (Score 4, Insightful) 223

Not really, it's more that the cables that come with devices are generally well made, and have lasted far longer than I've kept their original devices around.

Are you sure you are talking about Apple lightning cables? Most of mine have shrink-tubing around the end where the casing has split and the cable shielding started to fray. There's a reason there's a market for after market lightning, and it isn't because they only come in white.

Slashdot Top Deals

Life is a whim of several billion cells to be you for a while.

Working...