Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Ah the joys of FUD... already! (Score 1) 113

The best reason for driverless cars is to reduce the massive death toll on the roads. The primary question is not whether the package will 'protect my family', but whether it will sufficient to ensure a substantial cut in road deaths. Given that the sensors will have a better view of the road than a human driver has atm, the only question is whether the software will be good enough to convert that data into safer driving than we get atm. This seems achievable.

Comment How much will driver free operation cost? (Score 1) 113

That's the issue we're disagreeing on. My expectation is that it won't add more than $10,000 dollars overall, and that's not dissimilar to the price of insurance over a 10 year period for a lot of people. Given that insurance will no longer be necessary for a lot of people - if they aren't planning to leave the areas that are fully automated - then this will pay for the upgrade

Of course this assumes that people will persist in having their own cars, when it is likely that the shift will enable people to rent cars more cheaply than buying.

Comment Fair comment (Score 1) 113

I think it will be a case of city and suburban dwellers will take to it pretty rapidly as the financial advantage dawn on people and on the governments. It's not the answer for every situation, but it will make massively safer roads rapidly. The ability to give mobility to kids and old people who would otherwise be stuck without it will be worth a LOT.

Comment On the treatment of defectors (Score 0) 405

When someone finally rejects the system in which they have been living, it is inevitable that they will find themselves allies of those who have long opposed that system. The US ended up allied to Russia in 1941 despite Russia's invasion of the Baltic Republic in 1940; that didn't mean that FDR was now supporting Uncle Joe's purges, just that he had to find support for his war wherever he could get it.

The invasion of the Crimea is a continuing offence under any reasonable take on national independence. Remember how Russia and RT spun the story at the time - and how Putin now admits it was a preplanned invasion.

Then remember how many lies Radio Moscow of the USSR produced, and don't be surprised that it's been resurrected.

Comment Anchor admits to lies on RT (Score 3, Insightful) 405


I don't recognise the website, but I leave you to investigate

Not RT accused directly but

A reminder about the lies at the time of the invasion of the Crimea

And finally

Comment Indeed (Score 1) 91

Corporations need to ensure that their data is held by legal subsidiaries that can only be hit with a warrant by their own country's courts and which have no ability to access data controlled by another legal subsidiary. Whilst not trivial, it is surely possible for the relevant security keys to be strictly under the control of the relevant county's board of directors. That board of directors would be protected by the courts of its domicile - though I guess members may end up being unable to travel to the US if they resist a US warrant. But then sometimes the empire must be resisted...

Slashdot Top Deals

That does not compute.