Carbon taxes > Carbon credits. It removes the incentive to fudge carbon reductions for profit in this way, instead only emissions are measured and the closer they get to 0, the less companies pay. The taxes can then be spent on things like doing real atmospheric/oceanic carbon sequestration by a government that doesn't have a profit motive incentivizing them to screw it up in a way that conveniently funnels zillions of dollars into top management's wallets.
How did slavery enable those things to exist in a way that voluntary labor could not have? Voluntary labor can do anything slavery can, although perhaps with slightly lower levels of inequality.
If only the TLAs handled them with the Jihadist-level seriousness they deserve, then their complete lack of opsec would actually threaten their operations...I don't think Jan 6th caused any significant change their sadly. US law enforcement and intellligence agencies still handle domestic right-wing militias with kid gloves.
Like when 1950s doctors were promoting cigarettes, back when an ignorant society didn't know any better.
To be fair those were like the cranks who are saying "CO2 is just plant food" right now. Cigarettes were well-known to be harmful by mainstream medicine well before WW2.
Oh, correction, not too far behind this lady
Ooof, I'm not too far behind this guy...and yeah Tab Session Manager is the glue holding this shitshow together...
Sounds good, how about a landscape slider phone? My F(x)tec Pro1 is getting a bit long in the tooth...
Yep. Mr. Raghavan isn't the illness, he's just a symptom of ordinary market forces that innovative tech startups can only resist for so long.
Mr. President, we must not allow an exotic helicopter gap!
Marxism doesn't reject democracy at all and could hardly be any more pro-democratic, the only remotely undemocratic thought within Marxism is the concept that a "dictatorship of the proletariat" may be required during a transitional revolutionary period that would exist for the purpose of establishing a highly democratic communal society, and it seems to be only an assumption that this would be supported by the majority. If a majority voted to collectively seize all means of production (not private property, that's a red-scare strawman), you could call that populist or perhaps even authoritarian, but there's nothing undemocratic or anti-democratic about it.
Do you think having a command economy (a debatable label, but they are certainly closer to one than anywhere in the first world) makes them socialist or communist in some way? They have private ownership of the means of production, undemocratic workplaces, and billionaires that the state treats as royalty like Meng Wanzhou. State capitalism is still very much capitalism.
Biometrics: Credentials that can be stolen off your body, can't be hashed, and can never be reset...and stealing them off your body can be legal too.
Previous protests did result in a significant delay and eventual cancellation of Project Dragonfly, so the answer is yes, probably:
Unfortunately that's pretty much all of the companies...
It's worse than limited symptom-treating, they'll have no need to purchase data at all when they can just compel domestic companies to hand the data over China-style:
"Show business is just like high school, except you get paid." - Martin Mull
