Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - Dutch agencies provide crucial intel about Russia's interference in US-elections (volkskrant.nl) 1

An anonymous reader writes: Hackers from the Dutch intelligence service AIVD have provided the FBI with crucial information about Russian interference with the American elections. For years, AIVD had access to the infamous Russian hacker group Cozy Bear. That's what de Volkskrant and Nieuwsuur have uncovered in their investigation.

Submission + - How Russian hacking of DNC was monitored (volkskrant.nl)

Sara Chan writes: The Dutch General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) was able to penetrate the systems of the Russian hacker group Cozy Bear (APT29). AIVD claims that, beginning in 2014, they were able to monitor almost everything that Cozy Bear did, including the alleged 2016 hacking of the DNC. The story is being reported by the Dutch newspaper Volkskrant. No explanation is given as to why the story is being made public now.

Comment Re:Interesting timing re Trump's claims (Score 1) 447

“Neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.

Watch the quoted words closely. The President cannot give the order, not even in principle. Rather, the order must come from the FISA Court. The Court gives the order upon application by the Attorney General. The AG would almost certainly not act unless she had the approval of the President. Thus, the quoted words do not imply that President Obama did not approve surveillance.

Submission + - Russian Security Service: Spies Planted Malware On Critical Infrastructure (csoonline.com)

itwbennett writes: Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said Saturday that the country's critical infrastructure was targeted by customized malware delivered as an email attachment. Lucian Constantin reports that, according to the FSB, 'networks at some 20 organizations in Russia — including scientific and military institutions, defense contractors, and public authorities — were found to be infected with the malware.'

Submission + - Jill Stein Pledges to Grant Edward Snowden a Full Pardon (usuncut.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Edward Snowden, America’s #1 fugitive, would not only get a full pardon under a Jill Stein administration, but would get a promotion to one of the highest levels of government.

“[Snowden] has done an incredible service to our country at great cost to himself for having to live away from his family, his friends, his job, his network, to basically live as an expatriate,” Stein said during a livestreamed town hall with supporters on her Facebook page.

“I would say not only bring Snowden back, but bring him into my administration as a member of the Cabinet, because we need people who are part of our national security administration who are really, very patriotic,” Stein continued. “If we’re really going to protect American security, we also have to protect our Constitutional rights, and that includes our right to privacy.”

Comment Re:Why does the FBI director have such a long term (Score 2) 99

The Director's term is long in order to make the position less political. The Director has a lot of power; so it would be very bad if the Director was strongly partisan. Making the Director's term longer than the maximum term of a president (2*4 years) provides a strong incentive to the president (who appoints the Director) to appoint someone who will be negligibly partisan.

Comment From the Wall Street Journal.... (Score 1) 240

Bekow is an exert from “Ending Philanthropy as We Know It”, Wall Street Journal.

... the purposes of the company are clearly philanthropic, to advance “human potential” and promote “equality,” rather than earn money for its owners. However, it will not just make grants to nonprofits, as foundations typically do. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative will also own stakes in for-profit businesses in fields like education and health care, which its owners believe will help achieve their philanthropic goals.

Some have criticized traditional foundations and other charities for not having “a bottom line,” a readily available measure of success that would enable donors to determine whether their gifts were doing any good. A variety of surrogate approaches have been proposed to judge the effectiveness of philanthropy, such as elaborate cost-benefit analyses. But these tend to be costly and controversial, and they have attracted limited interest.

What Mr. Zuckerberg and others are proposing instead is to harness the profit motive on behalf of their philanthropic goals. This is often referred to as a “double bottom-line” approach: The companies in which the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative invests will have to show both a financial return in order to be sustainable and a social one—for example, increased numbers of lives saved or children finishing school—in order to obtain additional funding. And at least in theory, those companies that are unsuccessful would in time go out of business, unlike traditional charities, which can keep going, even if they are not very effective at their work, as long as they are good at raising money from donors.

The approach Mr. Zuckerberg is taking has several advantages. One is that if he had created a foundation, American tax laws would have required him to sell most of the Facebook stock he gave it. But by using the stock to fund a limited-liability company, he can keep control over as much of it as he wants (though he may sell some to make grants or investments).

....

... the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative represents the most significant effort so far to take a new approach to the kinds of problems with which philanthropy has long struggled. ....

Comment Re:There is a risk! (Score 5, Informative) 125

Human-dinosaur sex is technically a form of anal rape

You are obviously male and confused. Essentially all the human-dinosaur sex fantasies are of male dinosaurs having regular (especially vaginal) sex with female people. The novels of those fantasies are hardly ever bought by men.

Comment Re:Give me a raise (Score 1) 327

As an analogy, in a NBA basketball team, the coach is essentially a manager; yet the star players earn more money than the coach and are considered to be more important. Similarly, I know of sales teams where the top salespeople, whose earnings are based on commissions, earn far more than their managers. Nothing like this happens with programmers though, AFAIK.

Slashdot Top Deals

"There is such a fine line between genius and stupidity." - David St. Hubbins, "Spinal Tap"

Working...