Comment Consumers should accept security risks (Score 1) 582
After searching first my memory and then re-reading the original reference I can't find the world "backdoor" in the US Constitution or even the suggestion that Citizens only have rights when it's convenient for government paper pushers
I did discover s paragraph that seemed relevant though, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Unless we've had a recent amendment added to our founding document I think that ought to trump Mr Barr's suggestion of criminal conduct by the US Goverment.
I did discover s paragraph that seemed relevant though, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Unless we've had a recent amendment added to our founding document I think that ought to trump Mr Barr's suggestion of criminal conduct by the US Goverment.