Amiga Inc. Files Multiprocessing Patent 56
Pappy writes " It looks as if Amiga Inc's development wing has filed a patent involving a very unique Multiprocessing scheme, in which groups of processors are thrown into 'Clusters', as well as coming up with a interesting Bus-Arbitration scheme for Multiple Processor groups. Check out the patent online. " Given this, the political movements with Linux, and the recent silence, I'm inclined to think of the Tom Waits song: "What's he doing in there?"
Re:lyrics (Score:1)
Re:prior art? (Score:1)
Headline is *wrong* (Score:1)
The way the system works, patent filings are confidential unless and until the patent is granted.
Amiga is probably filing lots of patents, but you won't hear about them unless they're granted and that takes several years.
Re: (Score:2)
If a dead dog filed a patent I'd be amazed too. (Score:1)
They're not worth the effort. I use Linux, but even I don't buy the QNX fallout. And I loved Amigas in the old days.
Re:Wow. Cool. Nifty. (Score:2)
There are a lot of valid points that can be made about the viability of the Amiga in the long run. Similar cases on differing points can be made for the BeOS, Windows NT, Windows 98, Windows 2000, MacOS, MacOS X, FreeBSD and Linux. If you'd have mentioned the reluctance of development houses to port software to anything but Windows you'd have a point. If you'd have mentioned the high costs of manufacturing a new niche player in the hardware arena you'd have a point. However, your position can best be summarized by:
Have you ever had a relative who laid on his deathbed for years and years and refused to just keel over and die?
Those are braindead posturers. Boy I wish they'd just roll over and die already...
pentium (Score:1)
they where working so nah to all who said they have done nothing
its intresting because it describes what I think to be a clustering tec that intel used to build ACSI RED ?
with P Pro this would work I think
anybody into scrossbars ca they tell me ??
john
a poor student @ bournemouth uni in the UK (a deltic so please dont moan about spelling but the content)
Re:It was filed in 1997 (Score:1)
Re:The amiga's are taking over the world (Score:1)
Re:shut up. (Score:1)
Re:Imagine a Beowolf cluster with these things! (Score:1)
LOL! (Score:2)
That's funny, I guess we can say that about ALL vapourware, right?
If I may quote Monty Python:
Praline: Look matey (picks up Amiga) this computer wouldn't go voom if I put four thousand volts through it. It's bleeding demised.
Shopkeeper: It's not. It's pining.
Praline: It's not pining, it's passed on. This computer is no more. It has ceased to be. It's expired and gone to meet its maker. This is a late computer. It's a stiff. Bereft of life, it rests in peace. If you hadn't nailed it to the perch, it would be pushing up the daisies. It's rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible. This is an ex-computer!
Shopkeeper: Well I'd better replace it then.
Praline:(to camera)If you want to get anything done in this country you've got to complain till you're blue in the mouth.
Shopkeeper: Sorry guv', we're right out a Amigas.
Praline: I see. I see. I get the picture.
Shopkeeper: I've got a Pentium III.
Praline: Does it run AmigaOS?
Shopkeeper: Not really, no.
Praline: Well, it's scarcely a replacement, then is it?
J.
Nevermind... (Score:1)
Speaking of Anonymous people... Nah.
Ignore this - it's history (Score:1)
It's even more history because the scheme doesn't work with the PIIs/celereons being sold today (because if a chip has N request pins then you can put N-1 in a cluster - with their 2 pins you get 2 clusters of 1 cpu which is the same as 2 CPUs so it's kinda pointless) it would work on xeons but their a bit too upmarket
Here are 17 more Amiga patents (Score:1)
Is that really the same Amiga? (Score:1)
Does/did Amiga Inc really have anything going in North Sioux City, SD? And who are those inventors really?
/ Mårten Björkman - Celebrandil / Phenomena
lyrics (Score:1)
> "What's he doing in there?"
I belive it's "What's he _building_ in there?".
Sorry, just had to point that out, as it seems
that everyone has to correct at least one
error on every Slashdot post
Wow. Cool. Nifty. (Score:1)
deathbed for years and years and refused to just keel over and die?
That's Amiga.
So now they've filed a patent on hardware they're never going to sell. Add that to the OS revision for a machine that hasn't been built in about ten years. In a world where 500 MHz machines are becoming commonplace, how long can people limp along on machines designed around a 68040?
Amiga did cool stuff. But boy I wish they'd just roll over and die already...
-F
Re:lyrics (Score:1)
Too old to mean anything (Score:1)
This patent was filed in 1997, and Amiga Inc's plans have about-faced a number of times since then, along with management changes. It seems unlikely that whatever they are working on has roots going back two years, so I wouldn't try to infer much about their current plans from this old patent.
---
Have a Sloppy day!
What? Intel != Transmeta (Score:2)
Amiga won't get my money if they go Intel, that's for sure. Then it's phase5 g4 box with qnx and linux for me.
Collas, are you listening?
Re:Wow. Cool. Nifty. (Score:1)
--
"I was a fool to think I could dream as a normal man."
B. B. Buick
It was filed in 1997 (Score:2)
The main opinion in the Amiga-community
is, that Amiga Inc. filed the patent for
another company, also bought by Gateway2000
in 1997. See comp.sys.amiga.misc for details.
Joerg Dietrich
Re:Bravo! (Score:1)
But comments like this remind me of all the guys who, 5 or so years ago, were saying "Look, the *nix world is dead. Dead dead dead dead. Learn Windows, even though it isn't as good, and get on with it." They had no idea that Linux would grab the flat-lined corpse that was Unix and carry it forward to where it's now everyone's darling. And now THESE are the guys who loathe Linux... because they regret the choice they made and have to cut down Linux to avoid thinking of themselves as chumps.
Many of the posters here at
So get used to seeing Amiga, Amiga, Amiga, Amiga... until your eyes pop out and your brain explodes. Or just use
prior art? (Score:2)
Overall, I'd say it's interesting, but hardly novel, but I do look forward to seeing mainstream devices with this architecture.
Re:Too old to mean anything (Score:1)
Re:lyrics (Score:1)
--Threed
* (Score:1)
Operating systems, even Windows (which hides the fact from its users as thoroughly as possible), are actually collections of components, rather than undivided unities. Most of what an operating system does (manage file systems, control process execution, etc.) can be abstracted from the actual details of the computer hardware on which the operating system runs. Only a small inner core of the system must actually deal with the eccentric peculiarities of particular hardware. Once the operating system is written in a general language such as C, only that inner core, known in the trade as the kernel, will be highly specific to a particular computer architecture.
Of course.. that's because it mentioned Windows, and their futile efforts.. mwahaha!
shut up. (Score:1)
Re:Is that really the same Amiga? (Score:1)
Re:It was filed in 1997 (Score:1)
Re:prior art? (Score:1)
Re:What? Intel != Transmeta (Score:1)
<SCREAMING_PSYCHO_MODE>
IF ONLY THEY WOULD RELEASE SOMETHING! EVER!!!
</SCREAMING_PSYCHO_MODE>
Re:Bravo! (Score:1)
A parallel processing patent is interesting, but I'm not enough of an engineer to be able to evaluate it.
Collas has resigned (Score:1)