Alek's Christmas Lights: Humbug 327
g00set writes "Alek's Christmas lights story was previously covered on Slashdot here, however the Denver Channel is now reporting that it was all a hoax: 'The Lafayette man said he accomplished the trickery by taking 12 "base" photographs of the house with lights on and off and then constructed a Web page that appeared to show lights going on and off when the Web visitor clicked.'"
Big Deal (Score:5, Insightful)
Too funny! (Score:5, Insightful)
NAH!
Heh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hoax or not.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Bravo, bravo...
clap, clap, clap, clap
Sweet, Nice Hack (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Google ads on his page weren't a hoax tho (Score:3, Insightful)
Not really (Score:5, Insightful)
not quite (Score:3, Insightful)
now they know!
No harm, no foul? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hoax or not.... (Score:5, Insightful)
TW
I bet the AdWords wasn't a hoax (Score:3, Insightful)
All the while he was raking in the dough from his Google AdWords banners.
I wonder how much money he has made.
Re:Alek Comments (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm surprised nobody noticed (Score:5, Insightful)
Plus what about weather conditions? Plenty of local people must have seen the site. What about when it was raining or snowing and the webcam wasn't showing that?
kinda like kids & coin-op games (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Marketing/Management Material (Score:5, Insightful)
Except that he didn't lack it - go read his web page. It explains how he pulled it off, generating the faked images on the fly from a few pre-shot photos and perl.
Personally, I think it's a cool hack. Glad someone out there is still doing this stuff...
Why hoaz the simple? (Score:1, Insightful)
IMHO... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Google ads on his page weren't a hoax tho (Score:3, Insightful)
Google ads on his page weren't a hoax tho
So? Do advertisers care that the content of a page is factual? They want people to see their ads and buy things. Who cares what's on the page as long as millions of people view it. (Yes, I know that the ads are targtted based on the content of the page. Being fake or not doesn't change that target market though.)
Re:over 20,000 people died this weekend (Score:2, Insightful)
That said, you may notice at the top of the page that it says "News for Nerds." Anyone can go to one of the hundreds of world news sites to find out what is going on in the world.
A Hoax about a Hoax (Score:4, Insightful)
Good job, man.
Re:Hoax or not.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Nice job!
Re:Marketing/Management Material (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I bet the AdWords wasn't a hoax (Score:3, Insightful)
I think what you did was great and I actually enjoyed it more now that I found out that it was a hoax.
Congrats and I hope you continue on to bigger and better tricks in the future.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate my HOA, but do I understand why it's there. When I was 12, someone was given the land next to my parents' house and they immediately plopped a trailer home down on it. Never mind the fact there were no hookups or anything, they just cleared some of the brush, put up an outhouse, and plopped their shitty trailer home on their new land.
Needless to say, property values plummeted overnight. It took a determined group of neighbors to buy out the guy and return our neighborhood to normalicy.
HOA's just take that and zoning laws a little further. Basically, no one can do anything that might devalue your property. Many people see their home as an investment, not just a place to live, and they welcome this. Of course, it means that you have to give up a bit of your freedom as well. Good HOA's aren't that restrictive, and just make sure that you don't put a car up on blocks in your front lawn and never cut the yard. More restrictive ones might tell you how often you're going to paint your house.
The main problem with HOA's is that they tend to get populated with exactly the wrong kind of people. Who runs for the HOA offices? People with too much free time that like to stick their noses in other people's business. This thought pattern is really hard to overcome and root out once it gets in there, and most people don't realize who's running until it's too late. The busybodies will form a voting block, and the rest of the neighborhood will be just disorganized enough to not be able to get them out. That's when things go to shit. Not really, because the neighborhood looks nice, but neighbors start hating neighbors, and those (like me) who get disgusted with it simply move it. The busybodies like it too much to move, and the new blood takes too long to figure out the HOA isn't their friends.
Christ. I'm ranting. Look, I hate my HOA. However, I understand that it's a great idea corrupted by misguided people. As much as I hate it, I would have serious reservations about moving into a neighborhood without one.
The funny part is. . . (Score:3, Insightful)
"Huh? 10,000 Slashdotters all jostling to flip half a dozen toggles on some guy's house lights? As if that could possibly work. Talk about bottle necks! So either this is a Fool's plan, or it's a hoax and anybody who believes it has been Fooled, --as well as demonstrating themselves to be immature enough to still believe that they are the center of the universe where all rules including band-width averages only apply to other people. (Bad things can't happen to me because I'm special!). --Either way somebody somewhere is playing the Fool, and how the heck did this rate being posted on Slashdot?"
I almost posted something to that effect, but then I figured, "Aww. Don't be a humbug. It's Christmas. I'm sure the editors are just being cute."
-FL
Re:Marketing/Management Material (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:It's not like it's that hard or anything... (Score:2, Insightful)
http://www.x10.com/pressroom/pressroom_history.htm
and in greater depth:
http://www.hometoys.com/htinews/oct04/articles/rye /history.htm
This hacks me off (Score:2, Insightful)
Now it's gonna be just that much harder. Argh.
Do we really NEED another internet hoax? If the average clueless idiot wants to forward endlessly the Snopes fodder of the week, fine. Let the scourge of the internet propogate as they will. Forward their chain letters, buy their spam, and bug me endlessly about how my internet controlled lights MUST be fake, simply because they've never heard of X10 before. But someone who's obviously smart enough to know better has ruined it for the rest of us. And he seems pretty damned proud of himself too. Makes me sick.
-Restil
In other words (Score:5, Insightful)
By restricting your neighbors freedom of expression so you can get a neighborhood of houses that all look exactly alike you think your life is better.
Personally I'd like to live next door to someone who is creative enough to paint his house strange colors. I want nothing to do with the neighborhoods I've seen where every house looks the same, down to the flowers in the garden out front. To each his own I guess.
There is something there, kinda. (Score:3, Insightful)
(AdSense policies span more than one page.)
Actually, he may not be able to disclose the dollar amount he received, although I'm not sure how to interpret it and I don't feel like making the effort. Here, check out Item b from Google AdSenseTM Online Standard Terms and Conditions [google.com]:
-j.
Re:In other words (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Allright, you know the drill (Score:3, Insightful)
Why? Is it so hard to admit you've been tricked?
I for one find it admirable that he managed to trick many people (including myself) and the media. In fact, this is a better hack than it would have been if it had been real.
It's also a valuable lession: be sceptical about everything you see, especially on the internet.
Re:It's not like it's that hard or anything... (Score:3, Insightful)
Wanna know what simultaneous control of a camera for 1500 people would look like? Just take a webcam and mount it on top of a spring then whack the spring. 'Democratic' camera control? perhaps, but it wouldn't be true control, but that's another concept entirely.
This item surrounded 'expectations' by the viewers. I'm sure there were many that 'expected' it to be a real item. I have no doubt there were those here on Slashdot that went to the site and thought "this is really cool" without realizing that their sole control of camera and lights was a technically laughable 'expectation' given the number of simultaneous users. The expectations arise out of the lack of most basic understanding of the technology. That's what seems to have pissed people off about the whole thing. Those that think they are 'l331' got sucked into the whole thing, which I find extremely hilarious. I saw the story and just rolled my eyes because it's immediately apparent to the technically skilled that the whole sole control concept of this kind is not physically possible. One person controlling one cam, yes. Many controlling one cam, no. Those that have protested this the most are most likely those that got sucked into it the hardest. Just look at the posts here on Slashdot. There seem to be some really upset people that this whole thing was hoaxed while others find it extremely funny. The mission, if you choose to accept it, is to pick out the ones that went to the site and 'wondered' at it.