Starband Files for Chapter 11 123
PalmKiller writes "Well it looks like Starband is going into chapter 11. I got the email a few days ago. And just when I got CYGWIN with squid proxy working beautifully. With winproxy I rarely got any thoughput on my clients (20-50KBytes/sec or 160-360Kbits/sec), on squid I finally am getting 80-95KBytes/sec (640-760Kbits/sec continuously) and some faster bursts. Well, I guess I will ride her till she falls over and dies." Looks like Echostar's tactics have been successful. And we just did an article a few weeks ago on Starband's service, where most commenters weren't very happy.
another one bites the dust (Score:1)
Oh my god the Internets going bankrupt! (Score:1, Funny)
Users (Score:5, Informative)
Well, shoot (Score:2, Funny)
Too bad. A decent service if you don't have access to cable/dsl.
Adelphia (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Adelphia (Score:5, Insightful)
Adelphia postpones quarterly report due to 'accounting discrepancies' [theneteconomy.com]
More on accounting problems (google cache) [216.239.51.100]
Adelphia selling off assets (google cache) [216.239.51.100]
Absolutely ridiculous. All these telecoms going bye-bye. Where the fsck did the people who ran these business get their degrees? I mean, for god's sake, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if your company is 2 billion in debt maybe you shouldn't pay like 50 million to liscense a stadium (titan's adelphia stadium). Or perhaps you shouldn't get those $100,000 sun boxen. Always a favourite of mine - listening to all this super expensive brand-new equipment these companies have. Ebay anyone?
It just boggles my mind that somehow these morons got put in charge of a company like this. Take starband - why in god's name would you ban something like P2P filesharing programs? These programs are like the #1 reason people (Especially younger people) want to get broadband - but you filter them out. Great business strategy. Gee, I wonder why you are going bankrupt?
It just pisses me off that these morons who ran the company will get to live off of 'only 50 million' like that b*tch from Enron while 1,000 or more employees will have to try and have to scrape together a living. Argggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
</RANT<
Re:Adelphia (Score:3)
It has to do with upstream bandwidth only being about 64kbits/sec. You can't do P2P very well with such a limited upstream.
You get a full, uncensored, unlimited, usenet feed though, and to me, that more than makes up for it.
Starband is not something to get if you want to do any serving or uploading. It is primarily a download-only broadband solution, just like all other consumer satellite products. The advantage is that Starband doesn't tie up your phoneline for the upstream like others do.
Re:Adelphia (Score:2)
Re:Adelphia (Score:2)
Actually, if looking at it from a purely selfish standpoint (which I'm sure many if not most of those who ran these companies did), they were brilliant. After all, who has pocketed all this money and perks? These guys learned very well thank you. They perfectly manipulated a situation that allowed them to exploit gullable (and willing) VC's and other investors and customers. They rode the wave, were smart enough to know that it wouldn't last forever, so they milked it for all they could. For the most part, they have lost nothing. They have fat bank accounts, they will be able to get fat jobs. Now tell me how stupid they are again.
why in god's name would you ban something like P2P filesharing programs?
Bandwidth, bandwidth, bandwidth. If you want p2p, you'd go for cable modem/dsl, not starband. You'd only go starband if you had no choice (or detest your cable/phone company), in which case you'd have no choice. Seems like a smart move to me.
Re:Adelphia (Score:2)
three R's (Score:2)
Where the fsck did the people who ran these business get their degrees? I mean, for god's sake, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that if your company is 2 billion in debt maybe you shouldn't pay like 50 million to liscense a stadium (titan's adelphia stadium). Or perhaps you shouldn't get those $100,000 sun boxen. Always a favourite of mine - listening to all this super expensive brand-new equipment these companies have. Ebay anyone?
The people who run these companies are NOT going bankrupt pilfering them. If you have kept up with this Adelphia story you might have noticed that the owners gave themselves $2,000,000,000 loans and that kind of thing to subsidise their livestyles.
As Dogbert once said, "I can't tell you what I'm going to do with the company's assets, but it rhymes with villiage."
Next time, Read before you Rant stuff that ain't right.
Try this link. (Score:2)
Hasta la vista, Enrondelphia! (Score:2)
TeraPro is a kludge that allows cable companies without fiber plant to run cable modem over coax. It is notoriously unreliable. Here's details to wince over: Terayon: the TeraPro proprietary cable system [terayon.com]
Adelphia saddled us with this setup because they were unwilling to string fiber and set things up the right way with DOCSIS. I look forward to seeing them run out of town on a rail.
Re:Adelphia (Score:2)
Ownership Question (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ownership Question (Score:1)
Re:Ownership Question (Score:3, Insightful)
Gilat is a VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal, e.g. small satellite dish) hardware manufacturer that owned a large chunk of Starband. However, even though they retain a smaller stake in it, they recently wrote off all of their investment in the company, saying they didn't expect to get any of it back.
Echostar is the company behind Dish Network, and they had bought into Starband (majority ownership?) and planned to use it for their own residential satellite Internet service. Recently, though, Echostar decided it wanted to buy ("merge with") satellite biggie Hughes Electronics (operator of DirecTV).
Knowing that Echostar would face some regulatory hurdles over the consolidation, Echostar dropped Starband (claiming something or other was wrong with it) and then complained to the regulatory overseers that rural folks wouldn't be able to get Internet access unless their merger with Hughes was approved. I think I heard that Echostar recently took its reps off Starband's board, since they didn't seem to be too welcome anymore.
At no time, I think, were Gilat and Echostar really "partners" - they just both owned parts of Starband.
Chapter 11 (Score:3, Informative)
Chapter 11 is filing for protection from creditors during restructuring.
Doesn't mean it's not headed that way, just that it's not there yet.
~Will
Re:Chapter 11 (Score:1)
So what is left for rural areas? (Score:4, Insightful)
I can remember back in the day when AOL and other ISPs promised 98-99% local number coverage, and we were still in that other 1%. We didn't have local dial-up until 1996, when the local pharmacist (!) and his wife set up a T1 and modem pool out of their garage.
My question is: what is going to happen to these communities? With the FCC pushing toward one DSL provider and one cable provider per town, this is going to merit absolute disaster in a town that Verizon doesn't care about and where there practically isn't a cable company (the cable company went out of business three times in three years; everyone gave up and got satellite.)
I sense a real impending disaster that could perhaps be averted by something like fixed wireless. Are there feasibility studies on the 'Net (cost analyses, etc.) that show the costs of putting in a fixed wireless or other broadband setup? I've seen the case studies, many of which are posted on Slashdot. However, they fail to touch in the bigger problem, which is that this applies to 20% of the country.
If we want people to have broadband, someone is going to have to come up with a plan to offer it over large service areas over something that is not a phone or a cable line. Do we have answers yet? What is on the horizon?
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:3, Insightful)
Remember only because of the Rural Electrification act of 1923(?) did rural areas get electrict/telephones. A report from the DOE (deparment of Energy) that I read (can't find the link, of course) said that the total cost of wiring all those places took around 30-40 years to pay off. The telecoms make very, very little from rural areas, and in many cases lose money, so they tend to not care about them.
So either build your own or press the gov't to make some sort of law requiring the telco's to provide broadband.
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:2, Informative)
When you consider that the basic setup and install is over $500, this is a fairly expensive way to go, but I guess if your desperate for bandwith in rural areas . . .
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
There are very few other options this far out in the sticks..
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:2)
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
and I'm looking for me. thank you....
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you want to vote online?
Not until everyone can at a reasonable pace (most rural communities connect at 9600 baud - 21.6kbps -- absolutely useless for the modern internet).
Would you like to get rid of your telephone and only use your broadband connection?
Not until everyone one you would ever need to call has access to broadband.
>They already mostly have 56K dialup
As a rural resident, I can tell you that you've been lied to. Most of us are connecting at rates barely faster than a 14.4k modem, and most of us have enough line noise that getting a 24/7 connection is next to impossible.
Of course, if you're still on a party line (pretty much only found in rural areas now) getting on the internet would be a tag-team sport.
>Why do they have a right to broadband
I dunno, maybe because most of your food was produced by these people?
If you continue to treat rural folk as a second class, you can stop expecting first class eats. I mean, it goes with the territory. The more 3rd world countries surpass rural areas for access to amenities, the more likely your food's going to taste like its come from the third world!
And yes, I've heard from at least one local farmer who's pissed that he can't get broadband for his milk farm business. I don't know how he'd use it, though, so don't ask (I'm one of those SUV driving people who you'd rather not see spending any money in your city).
>except for the situation in which people and companies move to these rural areas specifically to save on taxes and land costs, while whining about the lack of services.
Most rural people who do this are willing to pay extra for extra services. I, for example, am paying $150 CDN a month for always-on high-speed internet. I would humbly suggest that your taxes fund $1, maybe $2 a month of your high-speed internet.
If anything, we pay more, and often are willing to pay more.
>They then of course proceed to create excess traffic and pollute our cities as they drive the 50 miles into the city in their SUVs to see a movie.
That's ok. Considering that the bulk of wealth (at least in my town) comes from people living outside of the downtown areas (where the city is most built up, and where DSL is everywhere), we'll just stop putting money into your city. How long do you think that theater will last when no one is buying the $5 cokes?
>I have yet to see any compelling need for universal broadband.
With ubiquity comes application.
If you can trust that anyone you sell a product has access to broadband, you'll build it in.
You are the reason why its taken over a decade after the introduction of broadband before there's been any real interest in broadband online console gaming.
>If someone can figure how to make a profit on wireless, that would be better.
They're trying, but unfortunately the equipment costs, and monthly service fees are not something that even people with money are willing to pay.
>They often can't have a fire station within a 1/2 mile
We do. Many, if not most, rural communities do. Without our volunteer fire department I have no clue what farmers would do when their barns and silos set on fire, not to mention the many times they save idiots from the city when they cause a crashe by driving 20 km/h on an 80 km/h.
>and they are generally not going to be within the limitation of a DSL line.
'Tis true, tis true. Ma Bell has made some very poor choices when building exchanges out in the country, and when the city expands into the country, they often have to pay dearly for it.
>Stop Whining
Sure, but don't expect a lot of home stereo MP3 players to have broadband jacks, and don't expect to be able to phone a lot of people with your new toy broadband phone, or easily watch movies online, or many of the other things that people with broadband want to do until everyone can get it.
We're whining because many of us are willing to pay almost 5 times what you pay for broadband, but somehow companies think even that won't make them money.
BTW: I'd suggest that us rural people are why North America has been stuck with such a pathetic cell phone system (CDMA is good to 5x the distance as GSM). I'd enjoy it if we can keep people like you, who consider us a second class, from getting their hands on broadband enabled devices in the same way. >:-D
TTYL, and remember, ubiquity is what got Microsoft where it is today, and its why Linux is having such a tough time in the market.
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
>If those compromises no longer make sense, we should consider moving.
And if everyone rural areas to the city, cities would have the added burden of housing 20-50% more people. As it stands, most people around here are fighting for apartments. Can you imagine what will happen to property prices if we all moved into the city? Heck, can you imagine the homeless rates?
In all seriousness, if everyone had thought like that 200 years ago, everyone would live in one big city, and 90% of North America would be absolutely open to being stolen by other countries! Not to mention how much more damage two planes would do when they land on the city's arcologies [arcology.com] (the only solution that provides everyone with everything possible)!
I made my choice, and I'm willing to pay for it. But, as I've seen city traffic going through my city quintuple to the point that my 300 person town is almost at the point of having a traffic light, I wonder just how much the city people really would owe us if we put a toll on that road. Or maybe we could all play fair, and either the city people could pay most of our road tax, not use our roads, or, better yet, give us something we'd like -- reasonably priced broadband.
We might burden you by wanting broadband at your rates (even though it'll increase your price a couple of bucks a month) but city people benefit from rural areas with fresh produce, shortcut roads, and a place they can sightsee in (even if that does piss us all off
I consider the tradeoff more than fair. I question if city people would be willing to live without fresh produce, shortcut roads, and some nice countryside they can visit on their weekends as willingly as I'd live without a phone line (because, if that happened, I'd try it for a while).
rural / food-growers / access rights (Score:1)
I dunno, maybe because most of your food was produced by these people?
If you continue to treat rural folk as a second class
Well, not only does agriculture pay well, it is enshrined in federal subsidy programs ... Why?
It has been suggested that this is due to the fact that 'agriculture states', which are states with tiny populations effectively control the senate (roughly 1/3 of the senate is described as 'ag states'. These politicians therefor represent a constituency whose main priority is agribusiness. (Being as they are politicians you'll often see their pet bills being sold to the voters as 'good for family farms' ... Guess what? Many very large ag businesses are family farms)
So what we get is a voting block in the senate which represents a tiny fraction of the voting population, yet is large enough to cut political deals with very large benefits for thier constituents. (These low-pop states btw also get an 2 electoral college votes per state toward the presidential election.)
This observation comes from some interesting university research which looked at power balance in the US system from a mathmatical perspective. Google didn't find the study (which was written more than 10 years ago) but the obvious google keywords will turn up lots of interesting links (like why we subsidze Ethanol for motor-fuel).
So I'm sorry but a pitch for tossing any more of my tax money toward the ag-states doesn't sit very well with me ...
By the way, I grew up and worked on a a small farm and know very well what rewarding and diffucult work it can be.
Re:So what is left for rural areas? (Score:1)
The question is, what is over the horizon? [slashdot.org]
Doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
Re:Doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
It's not sunspots (Score:2)
Re:Doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
Re:Doesn't surprise me (Score:1)
I would hate to see Starband fail. It's the best thing since flush toilets to folks facing 26.4 baud access.
Wildblue (Score:1)
Who's going to step up to the plate and deliver broadband to the masses outside the metro areas?
M-
Re:Wildblue (Score:1)
stipe42
Re:Wildblue (Score:2)
Re:Wildblue (Score:1)
They're called suburbs. Cable Internet and DSL are far from penetrating into all of the suburb areas. Plus, just because a county is a "metropolitan county" doesn't mean the entire county is within the city.
yaaaaeeeee!!! (Score:1)
damn... i'd better get that starband dish up on ebay..........
Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matters (Score:5, Insightful)
Before reading this, I had no idea who Starband was, what they did, where I might have known them from, etc. After reading it ...I still don't know, but I know that they're out of money and that it messes up some guy's Cygwin/Squid setup. But I don't *care* about some guy's Cygwin/Squid setup. If you want to convince the reader that this is important, maybe it would make more sense to mention, I dunno, who the fuck Starband is and why the hell it would matter to anyone if they're broke.
And to think I once saw Slashdot as journalism's great shining democratic hope. Oh the disappointment of reality.... :/
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:2)
But that would take time away from making snide little comments in the submission/story.
Seriously, if you have just now realized how badly Slashdot is run, you must be new here. Half the accepted submissions are trolls (designed only to get a knee-jerk, emotional reaction out of people), and the remainder are so poorly editted that they make no sense at all.
I only read Slashdot for the amusement factor now.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:2)
From an old fart, twice 30 is young.
/. editors are really headline writers with the object being to stir up controversy. Generally, any journalism is in the comments. Still the headline blurb was significantly more informative than the linked blurb from the CEO of Starband.
From the parent post. And to think I once saw Slashdot as journalism's great shining democratic hope.
For all I know it is. It does tend to be the only source of unbiased information. Sure there's bias and best to take everything with a few lumps of salt, but if there is unbiased information to be had, the most likely place to find it is
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:2)
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
But then hey, I'm wasting time feeding the trolls. Thrown stones, glass hourse, pot, kettle, yadda yadda yadda.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:2)
cheers.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
If you are an interested party, like you're using Starband, just the word "Starband" is enough.
It's talking about bit rates and proxys. Obviously something to do with internet connections. It could mention long ping times, but that starts to get far too wordy.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
Personally, I don't mind that they omit those details as I've always felt that stories here assume a certain level of basic knowledge from previous reading - I like it that way in fact as I do not have to wade through fluff in the articles.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:3, Funny)
I have the internet in my hard-drive under the desk - sometimes though, it disappears and clicking on the "e" doesen't work. Sometimes, though, clicking on the "N" works, and the internet works.
Gotta go - the paperclip is helping me write a letter.
Re:Slashdot: antinews for nerds, nothing else matt (Score:1)
Indeed. This kind of article is more the domain of FuckedCompany [fuckedcompany.com], IMHO.
Re:Gee! EchoStar is evil! (Score:3, Interesting)
You didn't read the article, and you really don't know anything about this whole thing, do you?
Echostar is a major stockholder in Starband, and they comitted fraud by entering into an agreement with Starband, and then backing out after they got what they could.
The Echostar agreement was that Echostar would sell starband bundled with Dish network packages, and then in Febuary, they were supposed to turn the accounts over the Starband, so that Starband could actually get some revenue. They never turned the accounts over, because they are interested in buying Hughes, which will come with its own satellite Internet, free from pesky things like having to compensate someone you were in a contract with.
Starband filed a suit against Echostar, but when they failed to get an injunctive order to get the accounts, they withdrew the suit. Starband was fucked over by Echostar through deception and fraud. Objectivism does not support fraud and deception, so your drivel is totally baseless.
To Borrow From A Monty Python Song... (Score:1)
And me still fooling around with 56k, of course XO [yahoo.com] looks comparatively healthy...
Those crazy creditors! (Score:2)
Now, through bankruptcy court, StarBand intends to restructure our debt, bring in an infusion of new equity, remove any impediments created by existing shareholders and emerge with a plan to achieve profitability.
Those pesky shareholders, always wanting a return on their investment. If management takes the attitude that the shareholders are the enemy, it's no wonder they're going under restructuring.
Re:Those crazy creditors! (Score:5, Informative)
EchoStar: Entered into marketing agreement with Starband and owns 30% of stock. Failed to perform on marketing agreement (which was to sell starband bundled with Dish Network collect the payments for a while, and then turn over the accounts to Starband in Feburary). Their failure to perform on this agreement has driven Starband into bandruptcy, because Starband does not know who to bill for their service, and thus, has basically zero revenue.
Echostar wants to kill Starband, because they are trying to buy Hughes, who owns DirectTV and has their own Satellite Internet product, which would make Echostar a lot more money than their arrangement with Starband does.
Echostar held several board seats at Starband, until they got interested in buying Hughes.
Other major shareholders:
Gilat - Provides the satellite network and services. Don't know if there is any sleezy goings on here.
Microsoft - Apparently pressured Starband into not allowing open source developers access to the protocols needed to build anything other than a Windows client for Starband. Starband is very Linux friendly, they even will provide the software you need to do Internet connection sharing, so that you can use Starband with non-MS computers, but they refuse to release the specs, for suspicious reasons.
Starband has nothing to lose by ditching the scum that makes up it's major shareholders.
About damn time (Score:3, Informative)
News for nerds, stuff that's at least two weeks old.
Re:About damn time (Score:2)
Did your submission include a reference to winproxy, cygwin, and squid? Was your submission totally incomprehensible, utterly failing to explain what Starband is, or what relation it might have with cygwin and squid?
Hell, I've spent the last 10 minutes trying to figure out if Starband had been funding either squid, or perhaps the cygwin port of squid. Obviously, if your submission was clear and concise, it wouldn't have pissed me off so much. Then, I wouldn't be so pissed that I'd spend another 5 minutes writing this whiney post. Then, I wouldn't have been staring at the RedHat Linux ad for the last 5 minutes, and the sense of community I get from this website would be gone.
Re:About damn time (Score:1)
Great reply. I actually submitted it twice, my first submission was a rather long one, explaining "Starband satellite internet service" and their relationship with Echostar, which is why they are in bankruptcy, but it was before they filed Ch11, it was a week before when they asked the judge for an injunction against Echostar, which was denied. (Apparently they just filed the suit to see if they could get the injunction, and didn't plan to carry through on it)
I then tried to shorten it, once they filed Ch11. I didn't mention a lot of unrelated open-souce programs, so that is probably what happened.
Re:About damn time (Score:1, Troll)
Without some opensource reference (or anti-ms) this isn't worth a story.
Re:About damn time (Score:1)
Re:About damn time (Score:2)
What I first thought it said (Score:5, Funny)
Starbucks files for chapter 11.
Holy shit! Starband is dead?! (Score:2)
If I knew who Starband was, however, I might.
Damn it all :( (Score:2)
Since the IT crunch I have taken to driving a semi, I'll (soon be) out 2 weeks and home 2 days for now.
While theres plenty of Inet access in truckstops (A lot offer truckers FREE broadband in a "Multi Media Center") theres times I'll be in the middle of nowhere and would like a lil something to keep me company. Granted, I'll have satellite email in the truck, thats where it stops. I was kicking around an idea of getting starband installed at my house (since the EULA says it has to be stationary, and installed professionally), rip it down, and jury rig it in my truck. I was even thinking of maybe getting a digital compass and basicstamp and doing a little hackjob to make it try to align itself when I was on the road.
But not anymore =\
Re:Damn it all :( (Score:3, Interesting)
As a side note, you can still do all this if you are so inclined. They are still selling Starband, and this message is being posted from it.
Don't worry (Score:3, Interesting)
You are sending a 1W signal from a 90cm dish. TV goes at 100W from a 9 meter antenna, so your signal will be 40 dB below theirs. But you won't be able to get it right without their cooperation, it takes a certain amount of interaction with their control center to get the antenna aligned. Even with an installer cert, they'd probably charge you an installation fee every time you moved.
Here's the catch: the antenna must be small, to reduce the cost and make it easier to transport and install. At the same time, radiated power must be low enough to comply with regulations. The consequence is that the EIRP (equivalent isotropic radiated power) received by the satellite is at the very edge of what's detectable. The procedure seems easy because it's mostly automated, but you can't do it by yourself. I know all this because I work for a company that sells exactly the same service as Starband, outside the USA.
This isn't surprising (Score:2, Interesting)
I knew even a year ago that they were having severe financial troubles. They couldn't even afford to pay me and the other interns $10/hour for any more then 20 hours per week. Plus I was kinda offered a job as a tier 3 tech (would handle things no other tech coudl figure out) but it was retracted because they couldn't afford more people.
I hope that Starband works everythign out. Like it or not, it's the only hope for many people across the US to get some form of broadband service.
News For News, Stuff That Isnt Familliar To Anyone (Score:2, Funny)
Here's Your Slashdot Daily Recap, Applicable to every article that has run since late '99:
Two companies you've never heard of are fighting over something you're not familliar with, and as a result, theyre leaving virtually TENS of people without a service you havent heard of either!
An evil corporate entity you've never heard of is DANGEROUSLY CLOSE to finally pushing a bill you've never heard of through Congress that will DANGEROUSLY restrict the rights you're not quite sure you had to begin with!
A popular author you've never heard of has a new book you've never heard of...Don't laugh! Critics you've never heard of are hailing it as a masterpiece, and the author himself has an enormous mob of fans (numbering in the dozens!!!) who have read everything he has written, including several other titles you've never heard of. He gets compared to William Gibson somewhere along the way, which makes him incredibly relevant, because everyone knows William Gibson = Relevant.
Someone has finally perfected a way to do something you were never aware of, which involves a cash prize, numerous officiating bodies you've never heard of and extra-long acronyms everyone but you has known about for years... These acronyms, so sinister, often stretch into the mind-numbing 4 and 5-letter category.
Someone wanna write a Perl script to replace Slashdot the same way that Slashdot wrote one to replace Jon Katz?
Re:News For News, Stuff That Isnt Familliar To Any (Score:1)
Re:News For News, Stuff That Isnt Familliar To Any (Score:2)
Oh. Sorry. I forgot to add the right formatting tags to all of my post
90kB/s is good? (Score:1)
Re:90kB/s is good? (Score:1)
Re:90kB/s is good? (Score:1)
Anybody could set up a broadband ISP in rural ares with DSL or Wireless if you could buy DS3 or OC3 TCP/IP bandwidth for what it's really worth using modern ethernet technology. In Canada you can buy from the government and they pass it on at cost which is cheap enough to give you good service even in rural areas.
Sadly in the States there is this massive infection of paranoia about the government which is, oddly enough, fueled by the government itself which came to power on a platform of government hatred. Talking about twisted. We need marijuana reforms so bad because everybody just needs to mellow out a bit.
The insistance that broadband has to be handled by the unregulated private sector because the government can't be trusted with our private communications is bizarre to say the least. It's particularly odd because if the government was to lay, or simply purchase existing fiber on the interstate highway rights of way for an at-cost ethernet only backbone it could simply promise the same level of monitoring on the government owned network as it currently already has over private networks. Since it's a matter of public record that private networks are fully monitored anyway in the name of national security, the government wouldn't need to have any more access to everybody's data on its own network than it already has on private ones, this would maintain the status quo and lower prices.
I can hear the argument now though --well it's not about THEM looking at my P2P pr0n downloads, it's that they'd be putting these struggling mom and pop baby bells and cable companies at an unfair disadvantage. Oh boo freakin' hoo. Finally the argument becomes --we can't have cheap broadband in rural areas because it would mean these telecoms wouldn't have a license to fuck the nation and block out anybody's attempt to start up a small rural ISP with broadband ISP grade bandwidth which is NOT a T1. That's what happens when you put government haters in charge of the government. They have to prove their point and their point was negative from the outset so if they don't fuck everything up they feel like they didn't do their job.
Incorrect Bit Conversions (Score:1)
As you can see, he's using the common "8 bits = 1 byte". However, that's not correct for network traffic. It's actually "10 bits = 1 byte" due to the network start and stop bits.
Just thought I'd point that out for clarification.
Re:Incorrect Bit Conversions (Score:2, Informative)
That's true for asynch serial lines, but not for other types, such as ethernet.
Re:Incorrect Bit Conversions (Score:2)
True. More like 15-20 bits = 1 byte.
kbps measures the bit speed, the time from one bit to the next, excluding the effects of overhead.
kBbs measures the rate at which bytes are sent down the pipe, including the effects of overhead.
You Guys All Missed The Obvious One (Score:1, Funny)
"Well, I guess I will ride her till she falls over and dies."
That's the spirit tiger!
So try the competition instead (Score:1)
http://www.directpc.com/ [directpc.com]
Re:OK. (Score:3, Informative)
Starband is a satellite ISP.
Squid is a proxy cache server, for HTTP, FTP and some other protocols. http://www.squid-cache.org/ . It's quite flexible, and is great for reducing outgoing web traffic on a network, which speeds up web browsing - I've seen a 40% reduction in bandwidth used for web surfing at my work by using squid.
And for the other buzzwords, wingate is a windows based proxy program, and cygwin is a unix environment for windows, which allows unix programs to run unchanged on NT kernel based versions of windows.
BBK
Re:OK. (Score:2)
I know what squid is, but without filling the crucial blank about who Starband is or what they do, it's not at all clear what Squid has to do with this.
This story is not about the peripheral technolgy savvy users can apply with their computer & internet usage; it is about a service company who's financial situation will make it difficult or imposslble to deliver that service. Explain the story in terms of who they are & what they do, and the technological implications are obvious to anyone that cares; explain the story in terms of technological glitches, and it's still baffling as to why this matters.
I wasn't trolling, this is really just bad, confusing journalism. The important facts of the story -- who, what, where, when -- need to be covered first & foremost. Editorializing on how this sucks for your Squid setup can come later, if at all.
Re:Once upon a time, slashdot was a peacefull plac (Score:1)
Re:who needs high latency? (Score:1)
I use Starband via the Ethernet port to a gateway running XP Pro. I use ICS and my down speeds are anywhere from 400 kb to 900 kb and I have seen it hum at over a meg. on late nights.
Up speeds and latency suck, but it is better than using the Avian Carrier Protocol.
I hear Tachyon kicks butt, but the price is was too hight (www.tachyon.com).
Direcway (www.direcway.com) sounds nice too and if something happens to Starband, I will switch to Direcway.