Vote in 5K Contest 72
antidigerati writes: "The annual 5k website contest is closed and in the voting stage! Some impressive entries this year. Take a look and vote for your favourites!" Slashdot will take first place in its little-known cousin, the 500K contest.
Re:WTF *is* it?? (Score:1)
You really ought to look a little harder.
Re:Cheap (Score:1)
And why not? You'll probably get some decent entries.
Re:WTF *is* it?? (Score:1)
Accessiblity of information does not mean explaining everything in words of one syllable.
Back in the good ole punch card days... (Score:2)
--
Re:the point is... (Score:1)
Can You provide documentation to the entry in under 5k?
Re:irony (Score:1)
Yes, it relies upon (usually) IIS and a Windows server which has it's own issues. There are several other languages that are inferior to ASP as far as performance and development time goes.
PHP would have been my choice, but ASP still runs at 43pps [zdnet.com] while PHP was only hitting 47pps. I'll ignore perl, as it's strong suit is definitely not in speed and efficiency. Even with CGI::Fast or mod_perl.
$ ls -l 5k5.gif
-rw-rw-r-- 1 xerithan xerithan 613 Apr 12 10:25 5k5.gif
Mhm.. not sure what other images you are talking about.
$ lynx -dump http://www.the5k.org|wc
101 552 4086
And I get the page in a nice 16 seconds (granted, isn't best but typically faster than the load time for slashdot)
I'm not sure where any irony is at really...
5K (Score:1)
It's late.
--
Thanks Stewart! (Score:2)
It's also wonderful to see the5k.org doing so well. The whole site was made quite a while after the 5k contest ended, and a lot of people would have been loath to put in the effort.
Thanks Stewart!!!
Kevin Fox
--
Re:whats the point... (Score:1)
Sometimes I feel like booting to DOS and writing a 4KB demo again.
You ascii goatse.cx trolls had a chance to shine (Score:1)
Re:Short code (Score:2)
Re:Slashdotted? Nope! (Score:2)
They have a nice lean design; it really ought to fly. How much to you want to bet everything including the front page is dynamically generated for each and every request?
Maybe there ought to be a web design contest for minimizing server end loads with dynamic content.
Easy Winner and Loser (Score:2)
The big loser? Skadden Arps Recruiting site. Arriving at the entry itself is sort of like buying a car in the classified ads and then finding out that it's a tiny plastic model of a car. The joke is barely funny until you realize someone submitted that entry for real, and that the entry was posted on the list anyway.
Timepiece is pretty funky, I have to say.
By the way, I have made websites under 5k before, and I've found them highly entertaining. They consist mostly of ranting text about my high school from about 5 years ago. Oh well, maybe my tastes are unique to the world...
irony (Score:3)
b.> their own images are 5k plus
c.> their pages are bland and slow
Re:irony (Score:2)
Did they have a zip of all the entries and did anybody mirror it?
5K 500K (Score:1)
Re:500K contest? (Score:1)
--
Re:Thanks Stewart! (Score:1)
--
Just as slow as ever. (Score:2)
now THAT's web karma for you.
fross
5k chess (Score:2)
By far the niftiest entry of the bunch.
Re:Slashdotted? Nope! (Score:3)
>Betcha they're running SQL Server too.
We are indeed running SQL2k. The server is doing fine, btw, though we seem to have maxed out the pipe with the recent
>How much to you want to bet everything including
>the front page is dynamically generated for each
>and every request?
I will take your bet! I am using an XML caching system I built so that calls to the DB are minimized, which means that the front page is not dynamically created every time (unless you count an XSL transformation). Each entry description page, and even the list of all entries are pulled from cached XML now (the list
Anyway, thanks for your interest in the contest.
Re:Slashdotted? Nope! (Score:1)
--
Re:WTF *is* it?? (Score:2)
You really ought to look a little harder.
WTF *is* it?? (Score:3)
I've seen this several time, and it's quite frustrating: people write their website with themselves in mind, assume that everyone who visits it will have a certain knowledge base to make sense of it, and never think of those who don't.
Re:whats the point... (Score:1)
lovely mahcine that it was it's a little long in the tooth nowadays
dave
Bitter (Score:1)
Re:WTF *is* it?? (Score:1)
I guess, had the NT server (www.the5k.org/list.asp) you would've been able to view the submissions and vote.
Does this define meta-reporting?
--sean
Re:Cheap (Score:1)
Did you see the 5k Chess [the5k.org] entry?
Truly fabuluous...
Re:size matters? (Score:1)
Re:How about htis award... (Score:1)
Our site had code that created dynamic Flash movies with perl. Now, for those of you that can imagine dynamic image creation meets slashdot effect - think bigger and you're about there. Ouch!
My server got a load of about 50 and stopped responding to outside stuff (it timed out) but Linux didn't go down or crash.
Mark.
Gezzzz.. man, lighten up a bit. (Score:1)
People can make the most pessimistic site, sent it in and you can judge them and decide which site is the least though out, lame, pessimistic, no sence of fun and ignorate?
Sounds like a cool idea? Cause by the tone of your post, It seems right up your ally.
Please.. it's just a bit of fun, don't spoil it for others just becasue you don't like it. If you don't like it, don't f'n go to there. Just don't moan on about how bad it is to others.
Re:Cheap (Score:1)
Anyway... not everything has to be usefull.
it also depends on your idea of usefull. I'm sure alot of the concepts could be taken and out and put to use.
Re:Gezzzz.. man, lighten up a bit. (Score:1)
Re:Bitter (Score:1)
---
Some say Netware is just like a wheel/ When you abend it, you can't mend it
Ambidexterity... (Score:1)
Add 2 more kB (Score:2)
rb
Re:Cheap (Score:1)
But that still leaves alot of crap, did you see the 5k run one?
________
Cheap (Score:2)
________
The only plain html entry... (Score:2)
I only saw one entry that was pure html...the sad sad story of the armadillo. I didn't get the joke, but I do want to know what that guy is doing in bed with an armadillo.
Re:5K in real life please (Score:1)
... (Score:1)
this (Score:1)
--
It HAD to happen... (Score:1)
Check out the Pixxxel Chix [the5k.org]. Hilarious! Just think of what "video strip poker" whould look like on the Atari 2600 and you'll get the idea--it's a great spoof of the typical smut site and quite impressive for 5K!
(btw, if it asks for a password type pixel)
Chuckle (Score:2)
I put in www.slashdot.org with the title "news for nerds" and It came up with forrest gump
I can only imagine slashdot playing forrest and kiro5shin playing bubba whenever slashdot posts a link...
kiro5 - I can't feel my webpages...
*chuckle*
the point is... (Score:2)
Perhaps the geek community would understand this contest better if it's explained as an optimization contest. You're given a 5120-byte limit on your entire Web site. Produce the best thing you can, with the best functionality and the best design, under that constraint.
My own entry ("Puzzle Cube") was a fantastic exercise in JavaScript optimization to this end. Make the code as functional as I can. Okay, now remove the whitespace and linebreaks. Retitle the variables and functions with single-letter names. Remove unnecessary braces. Replace array declarations with .split() methods to save a few more characters. Trim the fat. Make it lean. And oh, make it still work for 95% of the browsers.
Of course it's a gimmick -- but more accurately, it's a challenge. Or a proof-of-concept. Whichever you prefer.
Re:irony (Score:2)
So? The site couldn't work without server-side scripting. Most sites today can't, for that matter. But the first reason for restricting contestants from using ASP should be obvious: security.
b.) their own images are 5k plus
No, they aren't. The site is highly optimized as it is, if you check out the HTML source code, but they couldn't provide you all that information even in plain text for under 5k.
c.) their pages are bland and slow
Their pages are cleanly designed and they're being Slashdotted. Chill.
Slashdotted? Nope! (Score:1)
Wednesday, April 11
I'd have to say this is first - of course, now we're just going to kill it dead.
Kurdt
Re:Easy Winner and Loser (Score:1)
I beat it 3-Nil, but it should really have been 2-1.
My god, I can barely bean an amoeba at chess...
Re:Easy Winner and Loser (Score:1)
But I have a question: Who is julie?
(see source code at the end)
401k anyone? (Score:1)
5K is not a realistic limit (Score:1)
The reason is that HTML is so clumsy and inefficient that a 5K site must be devoid of all formatting, structure, images, and content to slide under the cap. Look at the HTML only entries. They are crap, amateur-looking sites. The reason is that even a professional web-monger like myself simply cannot pack anything good into 5K.
It's not a matter of finding the right optimizations, because there are none. There are right ways, and clumsy ways, but no elegant or clever ways. If the promoters of this contest want to see some real creativity perhaps they should raise the cap in the HTML only category to 30 or 40 K.
This would allow designers to demonstrate their creativity and cleverness, while producing more than 4 mono-color icons which lead to slightly different versions of the first page (This is the Earthsite entry, the highest scoring in the HTML only category). Take a look at the poorness of the entries, make your own decision, then flame me.
What is up with some of these posts???? (Score:2)
My next comment is, "Have you actully gone to the site and seen the 5k submissions?" Some are unbelievable! You've got to check out the flash dolphin submission near the bottom of the page. Or the chess game, or the useful yearly calander!
With out people trying to make java and/or scripts as small as possible we would have nothing left but bloated / slow web pages.
Give these guys a break, they worked their butts off and deserve tons of credit.
Linuxrunner
A question of timing (Score:1)
And i still say it'd be smarter to make a backup copy of a website before slashdotting it. (The backup can be auto'ly disabled as soon as the website staggers back to its feet.)
Sorry you are wrong. (Score:1)
A HTML document (along with style sheet) contains instructions on how a document is to be rendered by a browser (or other devices). In a way it is like writting one of those nifty perl script that will print out itself :-) But this is getting OT.
====
5K in real life please (Score:3)
As many posters already pointed out the the5k.org itself is extremely bloated. You have to jump through so many hoops just to look at a couple pages... Wouldn't it be nice if the 5k principle is applied more often in real life.
Size does matter, even if you have a fast connection (at the server AND the client side). Don't use FONT tags, don't specific "Arial, Verdana, sans-serif". Instead use Style Sheet and "sans-serif". Remember "Dynamic Font" from Netscape? "You want me to download some fonts just to look at your text page?" How silly is that?
I like to consider web programming, with HTML, CSS, images and other sources, an art form. An elegant programmer can (and will) create a well layout page using minimum amount of code. Not some hacks that know how to convert a .doc file into a "web" page or make an image map with DreamWeaver.
So yeah the 5k contest was interesting, but I would rather see more real examples of people writing good clean web page.
====
500K contest? (Score:2)
Bunch of hypocrites (Score:1)
-rw------- 1 anne_m anne_m 8676 Apr 12 2001 index.html
$ ls -l 2001_5k.gif
-rw------- 1 anne_m anne_m 3316 Apr 12 2001 2001_5k.gif
$
That's well more than 5Kb.
Re:WTF *is* it?? (Score:2)
I love my iBook. I use it to run Linux!
/. effect (Score:1)
How about htis award... (Score:2)
Plug for my website:
Wireless Networking Systems
Network over a 15 mile radius!
Create your own Wireless ISP!
www.techsplanet.com/wlan/ [techsplanet.com]
Short code (Score:2)
Of course we could do amazing things in the long lines that Applesoft BASIC gave us - 127 char I think?
I understand the APL programmers were the real stars at "one line of code" though.
As they say - the Lord created the world in 6 days, but an APL programmer could do it in on line.
R.
Re:Back in the good ole punch card days... (Score:1)
Vote for me! (Score:1)
Please give me a high score ;-)
5K? (Score:2)
size matters? (Score:1)
5k bandwidth competition (Score:2)
More looking at our own navel (Score:2)
It's efficiency? I'm all in favour of efficiency, but when the useful information is near zero, you get a very bad ratio, no matter how little resources you used.
It's a way of reflecting about the design, by adding constraints? That would be a wonderful idea. If they stated a goal, lets say design a web site with the periodic table of elements, and some strong size limitations, and let people use their minds on it, that would be something, IMHO. That perhaps would provide us with useful insights. But with no goals, it's only a collection of nonsense. I'm not particularly interested in how somebody solved a problem of his or her own invention, where the specifications could be changed at will.
It has no point, it's simply a fun site? Well, I have seen funnier.
So for me it's just another self-congratulation site. I have no time for it now, I must contemplate my navel, I think...Oh my! Isn't it interesting?...I think I'll forget everything about the outside world...ohmmmmm...
--
Why is this moderated 'funny'? (Score:1)
Take a look at Chuck Moore's work [ultratechnology.com]. His attitude is that the right amount of software for pretty much any task is about 1000 words (tokens).
(geez, these spoiled youngsters, with their gigabyte ram and their terabyte hard-drives... no clue about the days when you were happy -- happy! -- to have 16 kb of RAM)
--
Good ol' days (Score:1)
Re:Slashdotted? Nope! (Score:1)
whats the point... (Score:2)
Re:Easy Winner and Loser (Score:1)
When i programmed it, it was meant to be beaten. it's for begginers, and most begginners i've seen play it, get hammered pretty early on. but they get the chance to comeback. it's kind'a like playing agaist your dad when your 6 - he'll hit you hard and then let you win.
So for that reason, it will only try to "stale-mate" you. it's there for fun, not to beat bigblue.
As for the the idea of "purpose" in the 5k competition... well what about design and beauty? i still think a well designed HTML site thats pleasing to the eye, and easy to read and navigate, is FAR better then a novelty chess game.
-amplifi (creator of 5K Chess)
ps: julie's my lovely (well designed) wife. ; )