Journal drinkypoo's Journal: Trolling modders please DIAF 4
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1653626&cid=32226700
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1653626&cid=32226730
H.264 astroturf fail
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Trolling modders please DIAF
Today is a good day for information-gathering. Read someone else's mail file.
Surprised. (Score:2)
Do -1 Redundant moderations get metamoderated?
It seems to me that all of these moderations would get thrown out in a heartbeat under review.
I haven't metamodded in a long time, and I don't remember if very subjective moderation categories like "overrated", "underrated" and "redundant" are subject to review.
What's even worse about cases like drinky's is that the down-mods make these comments less likely to be seen by those that might mod them up. After reading the comments that come before, I just don't see
Re: (Score:2)
"...down-mods make these comments less likely to be seen by those that might mod them up. "
If you're modding, you're supposed to be reading at -1.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're modding, you're supposed to be reading at -1.
Yes, and if you're modding, you're not supposed to abuse moderation. And if you're a cop, you're not supposed to break the law. And if unicorns and sunshine pour out of my butthole, I'll open a roadside attraction.
More down-mod intrigue? (Score:2)
The condescending sig probably isn't helping you out either.