How do you expect things? How do you know your models are accurate?

Pumping greenhouse gases into the atmosphere is the definition of geoengineering. But you say we cannot predict geoengineering results. A climate catastrophe is upon us, and we know that reducing emissions is not going to happen, is crippling economies, and we don't know the outcome anyway.

Why are we not studying alternatives to GHG reductions? They may actually work, and the will probably cost a lot less. It's time for all options on the table, follow the science and the economics. Or is it not really such an emergency after all?

We apparently have very accurate climate models, so we can know exactly what will happen. Therefore we can be sure before any geoengineering is done.

Saying it does not make it so. No keys, no crypto.

These are the people who want a government backdoor into your data. Because terrorists and children.

Stablecoins are not cryptocurrency. Buyer beware.

Correct, this is the acid test. Can I do everything on a LibrePhone that I could before? NFC credit card tap-to-pay, banking, transit apps, government ID/drivers license, TFA?

All power to FSF and good luck opposing the Leviathan.

Is it too much to ask?

Thank you for this informative comment. Good riddance to TiVo, then, may the rest of their business model fizzle out as well. Maybe if they had chosen a different, more open path, they would have been better off?

When you abandon your hardware, you are expected to abandon your software.

Not surprising, given the warm embrace of Kim Dotcom. Tech will not flourish in this environment.

It seems implausible that the oil companies are generating all the emissions. To do so would mean burning the products that they could sell for profit.

You should make up a new word for this process.

There was a change in management and the former management wanted to build fabs and the current management wants to cut back.

Federal government paid Intel to build fabs. As they're not doing that, taking the money back is reasonable.

Intel is complaining about the money being taken in stock. Alternatively it could have been taken in cash which intel would have had to put as debt on its books. I think the stock is easier for them. US is also trying to build a sovereign wealth fund. 11 billion of intel stock is a reasonable addition to that.

Make copyright for 14 years, as it is supposed to be. Then we will be spared all this nonsense, together with umpteen Star Wars and Marvel spinoffs and endless remakes. Maybe Hoilywood will produce something original, for a change.

Any AI person out there who can say whether AI brings anything to chaos theory?