Comment Re:Well no kidding (Score 1) 49
That is not the question. The question is whether not handing them said machine is worse.
That is not the question. The question is whether not handing them said machine is worse.
Indeed. But too many idiots do not understand the difference between correlation and causation, because they can only think in correlations. For example, the typical MAGA is "keyword-trigger only". They see a specific keyword and then see the whole cloud of correlated things as also in there. Causation? They do not even understand the concept, much less being able to use it.
There's a huge difference:
Our governments, at least in theory, are controlled by us, the people. Ok, the 1% who make the major campaign contributions. But that's still a lot of people.
The number of SpaceX or Amazon shareholders who have enough shares to have a say in these matters is single-digits. So power is concentrated in much fewer hands.
Given dynamic battlefield, I don't think that is as easily done as you think, and the moment SpaceX makes a mistake and knocks out a Ukrainian drone on a mission, they'll be guilty for everything. There's not really a winning position for them here.
Russia isn't hiding that it targets civilian infrastructure. They still wage war the way everyone did it in 1939-1945. US and UK bombers essentially just opened the doors above German cities and let the unguided bombs fall wherever. We're not doing that anymore because most of the world learned that despite all this, they didn't exactly surrender. So it's a huge waste of resources. Russia, on the other hand, still thinks that Ukrainians will agree to becoming Russians due to a few cold and dark winters.
The project was doomed to fail from the very beginning.
Apple is too privacy focused. To make AI competitive, you have to be willing to share private data with it.
Right now, Gemini Live on Android sucks terribly, but I am more hopeful for it..
What possible legal use does a "mixing service" provide?
Hiding money flow from public view. It is trivial to automatically trace all transfers on the blockchain. And the same way I don't post my banking history to the Internet, I have a reasonable need to not have all of my Bitcoin transactions fully transparent to everyone in the world.
So tl;dr: The legal use is: Protect my privacy.
That doesn't mean I am doing anything illegal. I might be doing something perfectly legal but socially controversial - maybe I make campaign contributions to the communist party, or consume an unhealthy amount of furry porn. It might also be legal but I have a need to hide my finances from someone specific - maybe an abusive spouse, maybe overly controlling parent, maybe a stalker.
For the moment, Bitcoin is still a bit of a niche thing, but the more it moves into mainstream, the more people will have the interest and the capabilities to use Bitcoin to breach people's privacy when they use Bitcoins to pay for something.
It's not a recall when you do a firmware update on our phone or laptop.
Right. It's a recall when you need to get a certified technician to do it.
If you are really smart, yes. You will understand that. Most of my students limit LLM use, also because they have to pass an exam without. But less smart ones? They will just become dependent and learn nothing.
Plato was wrong on this one. He was not wrong to generally be skeptical of tools. A tool needs to prove its adequacy and usefulness before it sees general deployment. LLMs have not done that in the education space.
There is evidence right in the story. I guess you have terminal AI brain-rot.
This is exactly what any smart educator expected and the smarter students do too. A lot of mine are not using AI or using it only very carefully.
What we will increasingly see is a large divide between good and bad students. Not a surprise at all.
Well, the house of cards they have build is crumbling. Absolutely no surprise.
It is just called being professional and wanting a long-term future for your business. Boeing is all shot-term greed and incompetence.
From my understanding, yes. Crime support is the only thing that made crapto viable.
e-credibility: the non-guaranteeable likelihood that the electronic data you're seeing is genuine rather than somebody's made-up crap. - Karl Lehenbauer