Comment Re:No need to be outraged yet (Score 1) 81
I've never had a monitor that required specific drivers. Even the old EDTV that I have works just fine with no special drivers. Runs at a weird 1440x900 resolution.
I've never had a monitor that required specific drivers. Even the old EDTV that I have works just fine with no special drivers. Runs at a weird 1440x900 resolution.
...an article worth considering from Princeton University's Zeynep Tufekci:
We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives
Since scientists began playing around with dangerous pathogens in laboratories, the world has experienced four or five pandemics, depending on how you count. One of them, the 1977 Russian flu, was almost certainly sparked by a research mishap. Some Western scientists quickly suspected the odd virus had resided in a lab freezer for a couple of decades, but they kept mostly quiet for fear of ruffling feathers.
Yet in 2020, when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And when a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance lost a grant because it was planning to conduct risky research into bat viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology â" research that, if conducted with lax safety standards, could have resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world â" no fewer than 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend the organization.
So the Wuhan research was totally safe, and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission â" it certainly seemed like consensus.
We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan laboratoryâ(TM)s research, the details that have since emerged show that safety precautions might have been terrifyingly lax.
I'm not the person you replied to, but the Fairphone 5 meets their specification list.
As a side note, everything the parent asked for is common on older phones. Asking for them all together is not like asking for unrealistic / unicorn options.
I have the Office 365 family plan and I think it's a great deal $109 CAD a year is a pretty good deal considering I get 1 TB of cloud space for each family member. Even if you don't count MS Office, it's cheaper than any other cloud storage service. Plus it's really nice to have MS Office available on my computer. Nothing else comes close to Excel.
They want 35% of the phone to be produced locally. Does any modern phone meet this criteria?
It's not just developing nations. They have low-wait delivery services in Europe too.
Well said.
I would also add: if I have something to say about an an issue, I (try to) directly address the issue, not the person. Even when I find them aggravating. What little power we do have relates to discussion and sharing ideas about the issues at hand, and what charities we do — or don't — thoughtfully engage with.
While many are locked to one side or the other in our highly polarized political climate, some people can be moved by reasoned discussion. I even try to be one of those people. Mostly.
And the likeliest explanation is things connected with the GDPR "right to be forgotten":
... scrolls past giant banner ads, to find the (already checked) "Ads Disabled Thanks again for helping make Slashdot great!"
To your point, it's ccertainly perfect for this story.
But you know, they have to do something to increase revenue, since they've been entirely unable to update the site's code... you know, like supporting Unicode, which was introduced in 1991. Not to mention a bunch of useful HTML and trivial convenience features like markdown. Or making the firehose useful, or coming up with a modern user-moderation system.
I don't visit https://soylentnews.org any longer — not my cup of tea, community-wise — but it's worth noting they fixed the slashdot codebase years ago.
I still chuckle when Slashdot fronts me with an ad telling me I should put my code on their archive; they can't even manage this place worth a damn, and they want me to trust them with my code? That's a solid LOL. Also, No.
But we've dropped really low if we even skip OP or can't remember it a couple PgDn's further, haven't we.
Sir, this is a Wendy's.
Now, would you like a slightly smaller burger with your slightly smaller portion of fries?
BTW, that'll be 5% more with the new pricing.
Raising a question is asking a question
Sure. But that's not the phrase. The phrase is "raises the question."
FTFS:
Voters don't like high prices, so they punished the Democrats for being in charge when inflation hit.
Well, actually, voters don't like high prices, so they punished the Democrats for being in charge when corporate price gouging and housing price gouging hit and never backed off.
Also, because they have no other lever to "encourage" the corrupt political system to do something about it. Not that they will, of course. Have to keep those sweet corporate bribe flows running smoothly.
Buttons are fast.
Buttons are positive.
Buttons are easy to learn.
Voice is slow.
Voice is subject to noise.
Voice is subject to music, in particular music that isn't coming from the car's systems.
Voice is subject to multi-voice conflicts / conversation.
Voice is subject to misinterpretation.
Voice can give passengers access to driver-only decisions.
Voice can give bystanders access to driver-only decisions.
However, buttons cost more — and that's the motivation for the claim.
In addition, touchscreens and menus are actively dangerous because they remove the driver's visual attention from the road.
In other UI news, Apple, not satisfied with having put the charging port on the bottom of the "magic" mouse, has put the power button on the bottom of the latest Mac Mini.
I swear, I want to take a rolled up newspaper and just beat on some of these incompetent decision makers until the paper turns to dust.
The original Macbook in 2006 had only 512 megabytes
A 512 MB module cost $100-$200 in 2006. Sold in an $1000 machine. 10% of the cost.
And now a macbook air costs order of magnitude the same, but the RAM they're putting in it.... $10-20 (1-2% of the cost).
I wonder if that difference in cost is going to some other part of the machine or into margins?
(I know Apple don't pay retail prices for their RAM, which is what I quoted here, the actual percentage of cost will be lower)
The bloat isn't necessarily the browser's fault
You want me to do busywork so Apple doesn't have to pay an extra $10 for memory on a thousand dollar machine?
"Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -- William E. Davidsen