Anyone would be far better off going to a trade school and learning a skilled trade,
I'm not an expert in this field, but I don't see how this statement can be true for anyone ultimately interested in pursuing a PhD, MD, JD, and probably a plethora of other goals.
How the heck is not getting a charger in the box worth $1080 ? Was the judge watching TV and decided to charge per HD pixel?
At most, having no charger is worth $30
Time and effort spent on making the complaint and going to court, and the benefit to all other consumers, are well worth the $1080.
If the app must have and enforce moderation policies on user generated content, so should similar apps such as the various bulletin board apps as well as browsers such as Safari, Firefox, and Chrome.
Don't give them ideas!
How do you fact check every post on Twitter (or any other social media platform) ?
You don't need to fact check *every* post. Focus on the most popular, "trending", stuff.
You are supposed to pay taxes on any increase in value over the year, regardless of whether you sell it or otherwise use it.
That is wrong. The taxable event is the sale of an asset. Until then, the asset can go up or down in value and there is not tax due.
...when the countries banning Huawei refuse to let them connect their cables and cut the existing ones.
I think that in the modern world, intentionally cutting undersea cable would likely be a casus belli.
reporter
... but was not cleared for those specific documents
Which were at a much higher classification level than Manning gave to a reporter.
Same crime but far worse, especially given that the motive was not whistleblowing (as in Manning's case) but impressing the reporter enough that she had sex with him.
Manning did it for the USA - calling it treason suggests a very perverted idea of King before Country.
Wow. It's almost as if it hurts your eyes to look at a calm, logical argument
Such as this?
If that's the case, then you're being maliciously slanderous. You're literally lying about what he said, and defaming Damore's intentions and character by attributing thoughts and feelings to him that he simply does not have.
Very calm and logical I do not think. You've been ranting and foaming at the mouth about "whistleblowing" when nothing at all has been added to publicly available information - you need facts and not special snowflake hurt feelings to whistleblow.
This entire ridiculous thing is about double standards and being so incredibly naive about American corporations that you seem to think they are "liberal".
Haven't you got something better to do? Maybe whining about Milo Yiannopoulos and about how somebody dared to refuse to advertise his book? It seems you people think the chosen ones should be able to do whatever they like and everyone else should just get out of the way.
Now, hey, maybe you're a neuroscientist, and can explain where they got things wrong, but it looks legit to me.
Damore is out of his depth and quoting out of context and you don't have to be especially bright, and definitely no neuroscientist, to see the gaps - I'm kind of offended that you appear to think I'm stupid enough to be fooled by it.
Besides, your "research", if it was accurate, would show that women are a better fit than men for office jobs - what a fucking loser you are.
In specifications, Murphy's Law supersedes Ohm's.