1) You can't (safely) use the same password in more than one context.

It all depends on how much security you need for a particular application. As an example, do you really need a separate password for each and every blog you follow, and do they all need to be as strong as the one protecting your financial records? Probably not. Yes, knowing how to create, remember and use strong passwords is a Very Good Idea, but not every account you use needs one. My suggestion is to have simple, in-obvious but easy to remember passwords for accounts like that, and save the strong ones for places where you really care about security.

One warning: Unity, with the need to get the mouse into a very small strip down the left side of the screen to get to menus, is not at all "Parkinson's friendly." After several months of struggling with it, my older sister let me install Xfce on her Ubuntu desktop, and she's found it much easier. And, when she got a laptop, we started off with Xubuntu because we knew that was what she wanted. You may not find Xfce as comfortable as we do, (I use it on Fedora.) but if you're setting up a computer for somebody who has difficulties with small, precise hand motions, pick a DE that doesn't require them, and you'll all be better off.

In Soviet Russia, asteroids pulverize you!

Presumably that author wasn't just defining things cyclically and had defined cardinality elsewhere.

One would think so, but no. When I came across that book I was trying to learn about such things and I'd think that would have remembered it if he had.

and its only eight fucking dollars.

In this context, wouldn't eight frelling dollars be more appropriate?

It's been decades since I read that book, but unless my memory's worse that I think, he didn't define it at all.

What's worst is a teacher who defines a new term in a way that only makes sense if you already understand the concepts behind it. As an example, Rudy Rucker once defined a cardinal number (in a book) as, "A number is a cardinal number if it doesn't share its cardinality with any other number." Now, if you know what a cardinal number is, and what "cardinality" means, that's true. If you don't, as most of the readers of that book wouldn't, it's useless.

Admittedly that may open up a can of worms as those fraudulent researchers sue to get their names off billboards, but that's another issue.

Go ahead; let them sue. Refuse to settle and insist on your day in court. Then, you can prove to the jury that everything on those billboards is true, and with luck, the plaintiff's legal fees will bankrupt them.

IANAL, but I don't think so. Perjury is lying under oath, not taking the oath while intending to violate it. Probably, what happened is that the prosecutor was very careful not to ask any questions that would force the cops to mention the device, and the defense can only cross-examine a witness about things that were brought up during the direct examination.

I live in the city of Camarillo, in Ventura County, California. There are enough coyotes around here that nobody in their right mind lets their cats out at night because they'll get eaten.

I'm a vet with a minor, service related disability. (Hearing loss; it's bad enough that the VA will pay for my hearing aids and batteries, but not enough that I'm getting any money for it.) I also get all of my medical care from the VA because I'm retired and on a very limited income. Yes, there can be long waits at the VA, if you don't have an appointment, but that's just as true at private hospitals. And, I can't see where anybody benefits from increasing the number of people applying for a disability rating when there's already a two-year backlog. What the VA really needs right now is more people processing those claims, and the money to pay them. Then, once that's cleared up, we can worry about adding new reasons for vets to get disability. It's not a matter of not caring because I've got mine, it's a matter of first things first.

Building factories (and especially power plants) that don't pollute costs considerably more, and takes longer. If the Chinese want to industrialize as fast as possible, they may not be willing to accept the extra costs, both in time and money, that it would take to do it the clean way. Think of it as a form of instant gratification.

I'm sorry that you had a very bad experience. However, you need to remember that any government department with over 280,000 people in it is going to have a few that don't belong there. I don't want to start an argument, but do you have any evidence that this was more than an isolated case? If so, I'm sure that the people running the department would want to know about it.

I've used the same technique when editing /etc/fstab. In one shell, I make may changes and save, without exiting, then use mount -a in the other to see what happens. If there's no output, fine; if there is, I simply go back to the other shell, correct whatever I did wrong, save and try again. Works great for editing any config file that can be easily tested.

No. I was referring to the fact that most of the veterans using the VA either aren't disabled or are getting treated for conditions that have nothing to do with the service, and if it weren't for us, 90% of the people working for the VA would be out of work.

Somewhere else in this thread I mentioned that I had cataract surgery done by the VA. There's a very small chance that I developed cataracts because I worked on CW radar in the Navy, but if so, there's no way of proving it. I never set foot ashore in 'Nam, so there's very little chance that my Type II diabetes has anything to do with Agent Orange. And yet, I get medical care for these and other conditions from the VA, and because I'm on a very limited income, I'm not charged. If the VA didn't provide that kind of care and only dealt with conditions that were directly related to the service, it would be far, far smaller, and that's what I was talking about.