Studies show that MANY people get more done in the office. They're not anxiously looking at the clock to see when they can bolt out so they can get on with their real lives, and they don't burn out from commuting.
I've been saying this for literal decades, since the 90s, honestly: people at Microsoft AREN'T stupid, so when they do stupid things, it's ON PURPOSE.
Someone has read all the same evidence I have and they've determined that they'd rather have people LESS productive but MORE under control. Maybe it's a loyalty test. One way or another, they know that they could get the same (or more! People that work from home do a lot of free work, like answering emails outside of office hours) work out of remote folks, but they're dead set against it.
Every bad OS decision, everything that is bad for users, every stupid ad campaign, every employee-hostile directive. They really just don't care about people at all.
It just goes to show you, there's none more gullible than the paranoid.
Granted that was falling apart by the end of Trump's term and he was banned for comments relating to Jan 6.
He said "helped issue in" so it's quite plausibly correct. Lots of groups probably helped.
The problem is that an AI will "confidently lie", in a convincing way. It's a real problem, and that's why the submitter MUST remain responsible.
If, as seems probable, AI improves over the next few years, then that responsibility may be relocated, but not yet
The Gulf of Mexico is what the rest of the world calls it. Wikipedia isn't only for Americans, and America isn't the only place in the world.
I Spent 24 Hours with CS2 Millionaires
I'm not saying any of this is real, but I bet some sizable purchases have been driven by dreams of such.
Already 100 million years old when those johnny-come-lately dinosaurs came along.
How are they supposed to detect whether AI was used or not? This is pretty much a forced move. The key part is that the developer still has full responsibility.
PURGE COMPLETE.