Two of my implants are passworded - the TOTP application in my Vivokey Apex and my Walletmor payment implant, which occasionally prompt payment terminals to ask my PIN - and guess what: I didn't forget them because they're kind of important. Duh...
I don't think treason could have been made to apply. It's defined in the Constitution, and the definition is a *LOT* stricter than colloquial use.
Ah, but who is the consumer of those resources. Perhaps Google is selling compute to other companies. That could be quite a profitable approach.
If even Japan can see the crazy, that's saying something.
Chatbots were a lot stupider and more incoherent then, yes.
Are there eels in your hovercraft?
FWIW, Amazon lost money every quarter for nearly a decade. It hasn't been doing that recently.
They're hardware vendors, so it's likely disabled in either the hardware or the firmware.
1) "give me liberty or give me death" was always a minority position.
2) Things that work well when people live in rural areas with slow communication don't necessarily work well when people live in dense clusters (i.e. cities) and conversely.
3) It is always the job of the individual to assign weights to his Bayesian priors. The state may control the costs of your actions, but should not be allowed to control your beliefs.
I hope I've covered what you were asking, but it was a bit unclear.
Math is hard.
If a substantial percentage of the population is vaccinated, the likelihood of being exposed to measles is very low, so the 3% who might contract it if exposed have a good chance of not being exposed. This also doesn't account for whether the severity of the infection will be different for those 3% if they have been vaccinated.
The original claim was a deliberate fraud, but many people believed it, and their part in it was not a "deliberate fraud", at least not on their part. But they *did* believe it because they wanted to, in the face of contrary evidence.
Their part in it was stupidity, yes. Literally too stupid to formulate a criminal intent.
It isn't even that they gobbled it down at the time so much as they still believe it, despite extensive, conclusive evidence (including dozens of peer reviewed studies) that it was so much BS.
That there is no evidence to support it does not mean it cannot be true. But it should inform your assessment of probabilities.
Bingo. That is an absolutely correct factually true statement.
What you left out is that the job of the individual is to correctly assign probabilities.
Odd, I thought he was working for Putin.
You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
