They did ragebait on purpose. It worked on you. You engaged with it and got angry enough to leave a comment. That boosts posts.
It's literally what ragebait is meant to do.
Someone smarter than me can tell us if this is true literary irony or not. I never got the concept very well.
A school bus, with the red lights flashing, may NOT be passed on either side. This is to prevent children from being run over. Texas cops are quick to fine anyone who does, and it's hammered into your head in Drivers Ed.
In some states it's not a big deal, and so many of those people moved to Texas to get away from their states, only to turn Texas into what they hated. They don't learn.
I do remember when it came out, and when a work friend got one in the early 2000s. It seemed so freaky. Everybody was like, 'Toyota loses money on every one!' 'You're going to be crying when the battery wears out!' 'It'll break down twice as much as a normal car because it has 2 drivetrains!'
"Trump must win"?
Do you people even listen to yourselves?
The man is literally ADOLF HITLER.
one of Toyota's executives said that every model would be offered as a hybrid in about a decade. That might happen after three decades.
Really? The only ones available without a hybrid option that I can see are the GR 86 rwd coupe and the GR Supra.
We could include the GR Corolla and Hatchback Corolla if you don't consider them "Corollas."
"We were ahead of them by a mile, by 10 miles, on the internal combustion engine. They went into EVs, and then they convinced the Western world to go into EVs and play their game," the freshman Republican lawmaker from Ohio said during an auto industry conference. "That was just irrational, dumb policy."...
"I pushed back on the premise that EV somehow is about innovation," he said. "Electric vehicles were around in 1910. It's not like this is new technology."
Here's a guy working hard to ensure the US not only loses the global competition for auto production, but becomes the last bastion of tailpipe emissions.
Wouldn't doubt it at all.
"It's not like SpaceX did not have any missteps on their path to creating reusable boosters."
They weren't really missteps. It was part of their design philosophy. Build it enough to get past a "goal" (say, get past the launch tower) and test. If it doesn't meet the goal, ID the failure, redesign and test again. Once it reaches that "goal", create a new "goal" (sat, reach 20,000 ft). Repeat until it's reliable.
While this involves a lot of explosions, the actual time it takes to get a workable and reliable rocket was dramatically reduced.
Looks less like a failure on China's program and more like China learning from Musk.
"Here"
Here's an idea, pajeet! Why don't you fuck ALL THE WAY off and get off our AmeriKKKan social media?
Nobody wants to listen to you stinky foreigners who whower once a week and don't tip.
Leave. Go. Get on your own country's social media and post all the "AmeriKKKa sucks" comments you want there.
AUSLANDER RAUS!
Technology-wise, they've had top researchers all along. Want more? Just hire them, not hard when you have infinite money.
And google has access to everything. They serve about 1/3 of the population on earth every day. Not just search but webmail, texts, maps, word processor, TV (youtube), transportation (Waymo) everything.
Google is on almost everybody else's webpages too, through Google Ads.
There isn't much about your digital life google doesn't know about, and almost every potentially productive use of AI can be deployed to billions through their own services.
Neutrinos are into physicists.