I'm wondering. I have to pay a fine if i break the contract earlier... Wouldn't not providing the offered services be a breach on their end, entitling me to the same fee?

If i let my dog take a crap on somebody's plants, and then sue them for not paying for my manure, and later pay audits to proove my dog shat on every plant in the block, how is this different? ...besides the fact i lack monsanto's lobby and so people will actually sue ME for my dog's dung showing up all over the place.

If you think this will prevent the bank robbers from listening, you are naive beyond salvation.

The only thing this will do is prevent the public and media from listening to what your watchers are doing. ONLY THAT!

if now the robbers tune in with a $5 radio, tomorrow they will tune in with a $5000 radio or $5000 bribe, or a loot share for more people eying the police and reporting to them with $5 radios.
anyway, they will get around it. because well, that's the minimal investment on their part. the big investment is they risking their lives or freedom behind bars. and that they are already committing.

apps? nope. it's:

1. browser ability
2. browser performance
3. easiness to port open source software to platform

that's what will define the ONLY platform to survive in the next years. iphone and it's ease-the-problem app is just a phase.

it wasn't free. my phone cost me $600+ and it went directly to google as I bought via their nexus store.

If i wouldn't have bought it in this scenario, can i ask for a reimbursement now?

> exposure of Terahertz waves are still being researched upon

thanks for airport security and frequent flyers, i will know if tricoders are safe in a month or so.

Bot or not, it still counts as one pageview, hence one ad impression. ka-ching

Please, draw the line between bribery and campaigns donations the size of a whole country GDP

> If YouTube gives Universal the ability to delete videos at whim, so be it.

riiiigth. and the power play such draconian copyright laws have nothing in it i'm sure.

not surprisingly, the first poster was a GNAA troll.

What kind of person would have such a blatantly one sided post ready to paste here in a few seconds of the submission, totally unrelated to the article (article: US was used to force a company to drop a law suit against another company, comment: the company was bad for some other reason so i will ignore the power play)

what is surprising is that the troll is getting moded up.

geez. we need a car analogy. what if a chinese car manufacturer that does not answer to the US standards for tire rubber, and does not sell on the US, sues BP for fixing price of gas via scare tactics on small gas stations that are trying to compete on price? we should only thank them, but right after the US gov demands the extradition of the CEO for the car company and arrests him for not adhering to the tire rubber standards.