Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Two simple questions. (Score 1) 162

1. Were the safety guards, which were optional, installed?

2. We know investigators are looking into the computer system, does this mean the computer can also set the switch settings?

If the answers are "no" and "no" respectively, it was likely an accidental bump.

If the answers are "yes" and "no", then one of the pilots lied.

If the answer to the second one is yes, then regardless of the answer to the first, I'd hope the investigation thoroughly checks whether the software can be triggered into doing so through faulty data or the existence of software defects.

Comment Re:Losing what? (Score 1) 155

Actually a small fraction of the extremely rich do invest in or create things that a corporation wouldn't. But you can never tell which ones will do that, and they are often rather crazy in other ways.

I can't strike a good balance sheet on this thing. SpaceX required a wealthy backer to even get started. And probably Tesla speeded the development of electric cars by at least 5 years, more probably a decade. Those are really valuable contributions. They don't justify worshiping crazy ideas. But without the "extremely rich" class, they wouldn't have happened.

Comment Re:Math is Dead too (Score 1) 109

You shouldn't believe the hype ... in either direction. The vendors will always claim their product is better than it is, and those who are threatened by it will always deny the competency.

Unless, however, AI development hits a wall, one should expect it to continue to improve.

OTOH, I suspect that training it on the unmoderated internet has gone quite a bit beyond the optimal stage. That was good for basic grammar, and picking up neologisms, but beyond that it doesn't seem to lead anywhere. What is needs is "validated correct information with a relatively low noise level". And it still needs to be prepared to doubt it.

Comment Re:5x (Score 1) 109

Sorry, this just means you need to get better a modularizing your code...sorry, requests to the AI.
If it can only handle relatively small modules, that's what you ask it for.

FWIW, I expect that if it's true it won't stay true. (OTOH, I still code by hand, and only use the AI for hints as to how to do something in a language I'm not that familiar with.)

Comment Re:Testable Hypothesis (Score 2) 266

Also the newer homes are smaller. Even in suburbs the lot size has shrunk markedly, and the houses as well. I *think* the average size of a rural house has increased, but with all the open space around, that's a lots less significant.

But more importantly, this is but one of multiple factors all pushing in the same direction.

Comment Re:Houses (Score 1) 266

That's only part of the answer. Basically society doesn't really support having children. Part of that is housing, part is expense, part is time limitations, part is contraception, part is ...
I think that every simple answer is missing so many pieces that it's more wrong that right.

Slashdot Top Deals

"By the time they had diminished from 50 to 8, the other dwarves began to suspect "Hungry." -- a Larson cartoon

Working...