Comment Okay, so ... (Score 1) 44
Trump backed federal measure that would block states from passing AI laws for a decade
Which rich, tech-bro, donors running AI companies whispered this idea into his ear?
Trump backed federal measure that would block states from passing AI laws for a decade
Which rich, tech-bro, donors running AI companies whispered this idea into his ear?
I remember when cars were made from STEEL, had STEEL chrome bumpers. If you bumped into someone, you might
scratch the chrome. Now, bump into someone and it is a multi-thousand dollar repair! Plus, with all the electronic sensors
and what not, makes it even more expensive.
Rivian R1T Fender Bender Turns Into $42,000 Repair Bill
Here’s Why That Rivian R1T Repair Cost $42,000 After Just A Minor Fender-Bender
Trump is transactional. All he cares about is money and ego.
* glances over at the combined fiscal and narcissistic worth of the Pelosis, Clintons, and OBidens *
Maybe if it were only slightly less blatantly fucking obvious..
You can glance at them all you want, but they're not even close to Trump - by an order of magnitude, or two.
This discusses recent presidential net worth before and after and how they made their money: Chart Shows Net Worth of US Presidents Before and After Office (2024) with Obama and Clinton making most of it after leaving office, and Biden from real-estate . Trump lost money after his first term due to the economic downturn during the pandemic and $590M in loan repayments and is currently raking it in via various, putting it politely, avenues (link below).
The net worth as of 2025 (various Google results):
Bidens: $10M - mostly property
Obamas: $70M - mostly books
Clintons: $300M - books, speaking, investments, consulting
Trump: $6.2B (down from $7.3B) - most while *in* office: Presidency Boosts Trump’s Net Worth By $3 Billion In A Year
Pelosis: $280M - investments (big-cap tech stocks) and real estate (most probably during her 40 years in office) and her husband is a venture capitalist.
List of presidents of the United States by net worth: #1: Trump, #4 Clinton, #12: Obama, #25 Biden.
Ya, but once everything is available as cloud-only services, how much RAM and storage will us consumers really need?
This is the difference between a government that cares about consumer rights, and a government who gleefully applies the lube for corporations to fuck you with.
You get lube? Luxury!
I bought a pretty powerful gaming desktop 8 or 10 years ago. Now it still runs all of the games I play
I have a Dell XPS 420, that a friend gave me years ago, that is currently running Windows 10 just fine. Don't know when he got it, but the system came out in 2007. I'm sure it would run Linux (Mint) very well too, though I'll be switching to a system I built already running Mint 22.2 (ASRock Z77 Extreme3, Intel i7-3770, 32GB RAM). Neither system meets the (arbitrary) HW requirements for Windows 11, if I even wanted to use it. I also have several other very old Intel-based systems that run Linux fine as well as one Athlon 64 X2 system running OPNsense. Newer isn't always better - use and needs count for more.
Also users (both regular and corporate) are quite literally exhausted of getting fucked in the ass by Micro$haft repeatedly
Still better that what you'd get from MacroSoft
It succeeded in, conveniently, disassembling itself *and* landing at multiple places at the same time.
lowered sales growth targets for certain artificial intelligence products
lower quotas for specific products
If it's something customers actually want, or even need, you don't need sales targets/quotas.
The AI assistant ate my homework.
They're not that young anymore. Give it it 3-5 years and the time will solve the problem for you.
That sentiment lives here in the U.S. too.
I grew up in a poor family that qualified for free school lunches as a result. I put myself through college because my parents couldn't afford *any* of my tuition or room and board. I started with nothing, and worked my way to the upper-middle class. Nobody, no government, gave it to me, I got myself there.
Government didn't give you those free school lunches? Also, if you were that poor, you would have qualified for college tuition assistance - if you didn't take it, that's on you. I'm sure. if you think about things a little more, you'll find many "liberal" programs helped you along the way to "getting there yourself" -- many programs that Democrats want to fund and Republicans don't.
I also don't think your characterization that liberals believe people are stuck as haves or have-nots, or that conservatives believe all things are fluid and self-determined is accurate. For example, plenty of red-states receive assistance ultimately provided by blue states. Republicans want to cut funding for many assistance programs supported by Democrats. Conservatives often do this under the guise of eliminating "fraud, waste and abuse" though they usually can't document much of that.
You will never find conservative influencers yammering about the "ruling class" just as you'll never find liberal influencers complaining about "woke." Prove me wrong!
Elon Musk . He's been all over the place on both sides, voting both Democrat and Republican, was woke, but not anymore, definitely part of the ruing class. Granted, one could argue it's part of a progression, but still a dichotomy to some extent. Also, in the same vein to some extent over time, Trump.
We do agree that, in the long run anyway, employers that just want dumb employees aren't doing themselves any favors.
Anyway, best wishes...
renders the password icon invisible on the lock screen,
"Microsoft takes Security Through Obscurity too far."
The phrase "ruling class"
I get your points, but I simply used it for lack of something better coming to mind quickly about people who are literally in charge of - aka ruling - things -- like the rich, politicians and politically connected. I'll note that those in the "ruling class" and those who are "woke" aren't mutually exclusive, as your imply; it's not a Left vs. Right; Trump(ist) vs. Others thing. It's more of a Haves vs. Have-Nots thing with the former always wanting more and them not caring if the latter have less. Though I'd remind the former that usually only works for so long - ask the French aristocracy about how that went.
Some (many? most?) employers want some employees to be critical, independent thinkers with the rest/bulk just doing and believing what they're told and staying put. That's good for the employers, but not necessarily for the employees. Pretty sure this isn't a surprise. More AI and dumber workers will help with that.
"not a single product was delivered on schedule,"
I get why upper-management dislikes this, but did they consider that trying to deliver things, especially complex things like CPUs, on a schedule is part of their quality problem?
* UNIX is a Trademark of Bell Laboratories.