when was invading a country by military force and imposing your own government the same thing as joining it organically
Joining organically? There is nothing organic about what is happening right now. No Western population wants such high level of migration; you had Brexit, you have far-right parties coming to power in France, Trump 2 in US, etc. It is universally opposed, unpopular, top-down globalist policy that is going to destabilize established world order. The real question is why force it on the unwilling population and risk inevitable chaos, unless causing chaos is the goal?
Even the attempt to reframe the proposal leaves the proposal as ugly and racist.
Smearing your political opponents as racist is so passe.
Why would those things rise to the level of causing an exodus, unless western arms unimaginably multiplied their power?
Most of these places always high level of crime, poverty, corruption, and never knew any other form of government but dictatorships.These endemic issues also predate colonialism. These don't cause exodus, having an accessible alternative in the West is what cause exodus. Yes when these migrants arrive to the west, they continue destructive behaviors that led their home countries to be drowned in crime, poverty and corruption.
Why was immigration not a problem before colonialism?
Because before modern era border guards would shoot at would-be migrants if they approached border.
Why leave out production-destroying war, made easy by US made weapons?
Why leave out crime, corruption, and dictatorships made by their own people?
because anyone who updates their software to fix even one of the 100 links in the vulnerability chain renders the attack useless
Sure. The attacker is now out of some CPU time and bandwidth. Unlike previously, where attacker's time would've been wasted.
The first, with cattles, the only change called for is "It asked for the removal of livestock from public lands that are Herd Management Areas (HMAs). " I don't think that's objectionable.
I am not a rancher, so what I say may be not accurate. The meaning of this ask is to drastically reduce the size of free roaming herd OR switch to feedlot. To dangerously oversimplify the issue - feedlot is bad for the animals, meat quality, and the environment. Pasture raised beef has minimal impact of the environment and is better beef and healthier cows. So yes, I am against what is being asked in the first link.
These examples were illustrative, as a reply to a troll accusing me of inventing things
Enzymes are things invented by biologists that explain things which otherwise require harder thinking. -- Jerome Lettvin