I want to live in a society that share my values and do not try to impose Jihad or Woke or Christian Fundamentalism on me. I don't think you can get there through diversity.

This is demonstrably wrong. Bannon and Tucker very publicly disagreed with Trump on Iran and are still core MAGA. That is, Trump had to concede to the base that held him accountable to anti-war electoral promise. There were credible threats of third-party runs and projected midterm losses for Trump (likely resulting in Democrat-led impeachment).

This might be your view from the outside. The reality is that MAGA, just like any other political movement, is a broad coalition of various special and broad interest groups that do not agree with each other on a number of topics. Broadly speaking, it is a coalition of socially conservatives, anti-war and trade isolationists, big business, neocon war hawks, etc. About the only thing everyone agrees is disdain for Woke, where everything else has pro and against coalitions.

Do you have a survey to prove this?

So you don't think diversity is strength anymore? Or only if it diverse from political opinions you personally approve?

This is absolute bullshit. There is no "single voice" on the right and even MAGA does not agree on everything. Remember recent almost-war with Iran? Tucker and Bannon pulled us out of it. Remember Elon wanting more H-1B? Remember Ben Shapiro getting ostracized over asking for affirmative action for Jews and censorship of pro-Palestine voices? etc. etc.

Violence against your political opponents will only lead to more violence directed back at you, and there is no guarantee that you will win the fight you started. I would rather live in a peaceful democratic society where differences settles via debates and at the polls, but then "punch the nazi" morons like you are widespread.

Nostalgia or collective amnesia? 18 out 60 minutes watching blaring ads?

Your are being disingenuous or lived under a rock for the past 30 years. Far left in 2025 is antifa and BLM "mostly peaceful" setting government buildings on fire.

You have to ask why nobody in academia would do that so students would have to go to Charlie Kirk fora that? That is, why is academia is only voicing criticisms of conservative ideas?

The Hyperpoliticization of Higher Ed

According to the most recently available HERI survey, liberal and far-left faculty members grew from 44.8 percent in 1998 to 59.8 percent in 2016-17. Liberal and far-left faculty no longer make up a plurality of American academics. They are now the clear majority.

Accompanying this shift, faculty and university administrators have increasingly prioritized overt political activism as a primary emphasis of classroom instruction. The changing ideological landscape has not only made nonleft constituencies feel increasingly unwelcome on campus-it has also started to materialize in hiring discrimination against faculty applicants with nonleft perspectives in several of the most politically skewed disciplines.

In context of Universities, promoting your own political views in a one-sided manner that omits valid criticisms of said views while presenting opposing views in a biased way that only presents criticisms all while suppressing the opposite.

It should surprise absolutely no one that when 95% Left faculty and administration act politically, they are acting to advance Left's causes.

Having ChatGPT without ads was never on the table. Inevitable enshittification.

New and improved shopping channel, but now with 10% more hallucinations and bullshit.

"Computer science went from a future-proof career to an industry in upheaval in a shockingly small amount of time."

This is basically 2001 prior to 9/11 again. Even the Slashdot comments could be substituted. I must be getting old.

Sucks to be graduating right now.