The fact that you resorted to arguing sociology in attempts to defend this paper is all the proof I need to demonstrate my point.

If they overpower the humanity trying to stop them from doing those things, yes.

Guilty as charged. My smartphone is intent-connected.

Biden administration played by the rules? You mean by the rules written in The Prince? Because these people are synonymous with weaponizing FBI, Justice, etc. against political opponents. Plus, they tried implementing Ministry of Truth, and if not for Nina Jankowicz going viral, it would have worked. No, just no.

I don't have to read past the title, it is obvious idiocy. Making ethnic case for what is clearly a socioeconomic issue is just that obviously wrong. Whoever published that paper clearly had a conclusion and the goal to make it about race. To push The Narrative.

I wouldn't lose any sleep if they just redirected funds to the space program.

I think Trump #1 would have happened if Dems nominated anyone else but HRC.

None of it climate science. Next question.

No this is not science, but ideologically driven activism. At best this is improper control of confounding variables, at worse this is p-hacking and all of it is politically motivated,

It won't end there, as this will be done right back to democrats. Are you OK with that?

I disagree. Took me all of 5 minutes to find this: Research confirms non-white urban residents face more heat stress.

So we should prosecute these terrible people and make sure they can't speak up or vote ever again, right? At the very least, we should ban them from Internet so they can't spread their violent malinformation.

You are deranged. Such attitudes exemplify why the left cannot be trusted with democratic institutions or stewardship of Western Values, which they are currently dismantling in the UK. 1984 was not supposed to be treated as "how to" manual, yet you obviously do.

While this tracker of legal challenges to Trump Administration is very interesting, it does not demonstrate illegal conduct in context of impeachment. That is, there are always legal challenges for any administration, Trump's Administration likely has more than average because they are trying to do more changes than average. This is categorically not in any shape a form could be a justification for impeachment.

Fine. Please explain to me what exactly is Indigenous and Earth Sciences in context of inclusive and justice-centered approach. Are Native American Weather Ceremonies or "research" into non-white urban heat stress part of that?

You are oversimplifying herd immunity by ignoring natural immunity. You achieve herd immunity when a large percentage of "the herd" was either vaccinated and/or recovered from a disease. In most cases vaccine reduces severity of the disease but actually getting the disease and recovering is what likely give individuals sterilizing immunity. So the actual process of getting herd immunity is as follows: 1) get vaccinated, get infected and have mild or asymptomatic illness, get immune 2) not vaccinated, get infected, have unmitigated illness, die or recover, get immune. Regardless of the path the individual takes, society on the whole arrives to herd immunity. So you don't have a case for forcing vaccinations on individuals for anything short of really lethal diseases (e.g., black plague).