You don't get to bring that up unprompted and then play "this is personal" to get out of justifying what was claimed. More so, the question can easily be addressed categorically, without naming people and events.

So what exactly are you saying then:

Well what?

The original claim that ACA saved rsliver's friends and family lives. If that was the actual case, there would be factual account of how and why.

The real point you failed to address, of course, is that Democratic policies are in general made life more miserable and expensive for everyone, even if it happened to save some lives somewhere, perhaps by accident. This is largely because Democrats in general and rabid leftists like you in particular are not friends with logic and reason, instead choosing to emote your way into counterproductive and often harmful action.

You are 100% certified delusional and a danger to society if you believe that spoken words of criticism in any form or shape justify shooting someone in the neck to death. You do understand that at some point people on the right will start shooting back, don't you?

More so, none of the quotes you provided raise to the level of a threat by any reasonable interpretation.

What any of this has to do with the current administration?

Did he attack him directly or verbally? These are not the same thing. Words have meaning and that meaning matter when we discussing shooting someone in the neck.

Please explain to me how ACA saved you relative's life as you originally claimed. Were they uninsured before ACA? If so why?

Thank you clarifying that your delusional partisanship is in play. I am not even going to ask why you think Section 230 saved your family members, I simply do not care why you believe such bullshit.

VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 10/29/2021. This early on data is especially interesting because a) this is before VAERS system became common knowledge, b) this is data that was available early on to CDC.

Robinhood is only there to help you lose money. If its Wallstreet backers get squeezed, like with the Gamestop short squeeze, they will suspend your trades and ban your account. No reason to expect they will be any different in this.

Yes, you can't be a specialist at everything. I did not want to develop expertise in immunology, mRNA, etc. so I could understand what is going on, but I had to, because observable and objective reality did not match what "experts" were telling us. I'd rather kick back with a good SF book from my list than read papers and spend time deep diving-into obscure subjects I have no interest in. These "experts" are NOT trustworthy.

I think you are memory-holing a lot. Vaccine was advertised by experts as safe and effective. It was also advertised as preventing infection. It was also advertised as better than natural immunity. All which is false could be known as such even without benefit of the hindsight.

Only that did not happen. We were locked down (except maybe Florida and Texas) for a while after vaccines became available. Do you remember masks, distancing, "papers please" to go out to dinner, 14 days isolation, parks and school closures, etc. ? Where I lived there were at least 3 waves of full lock downs, at least 1 well after I got personally vaccinated. That bullshit lasted all the way until Canadians and Australians started protesting. Even as introvert, that was way too much.

What laws would that be?

Please present your case that Harris administration would have been different on this issue.

Presented evidence that I see as sufficient proof that mRNA COVID jabs were not as advertised. Appeals to authority does not work for me, as I see NIH, HHS etc. betrayed my trust. I hope RFK Jr. is as damaging to these bureaucrats as the worst critics predict. They should have rescinded emergency authorization for mRNA jabs (or at least limit it to emergency personal) as soon as early safety data became available. They should have insisted safety trials were redone with larger population and for longer time. More so, something as risky as mRNA jabs should have never become mandatory considering we knew early on it offered no sterilizing immunity (i.e., does not prevent spread). I am genuinely angry about this and have directed my donations and voting accordingly.

In cosmological scales that is very close. However, in human scales this is unreachable. We need drastic extension of life, or suspended animation, or new physics that would allow for FTL travel.