Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:The old auto makers are fucked. (Score 1) 146

I think American companies do it because 5% of people will keep coming back to the dealer for oil changes. With synthetic oil nowadays there's a much longer window.

They sell a much larger window.

Unfortunately the American thinner oil factory recommendations to meet CAFE standards (American 0W-20 vs. EU 5w-30 for the exact same motor) means that those “much longer” windows result in a nightmare building up in the engine. Even with synthetics.

This is one of those silly debates where seasoned mechanics sit back and sip their coffee while adhering to a 5K oil change interval schedule for themselves, smiling at how secure their job is due to marketing gullibility.

Comment Re:The old auto makers are fucked. (Score 1) 146

Finally, your average car owner in the US is not the best when it comes to maintenance and will run an engine long past its oil-change point. This is where the trouble starts.

As an off topic note, what is this "oil-change point" that you're referring to? I mean really in numbers. I constantly see people say things like 5k-10k miles. European cars typically have that change point closer to 20k miles. I find a large number of people who don't do the "required" oil change are actually maintaining their cars to a perfectly fine modern standard, they just aren't acting like it's the 1970s anymore.

The best maintenance schedule confirmed by reality and not marketing, is going to come from your local seasoned mechanic. If you tell them 20K oil change intervals, best make sure they’re not drinking something hot to be spit all over you in uncontrolled laughter.

I do my own maintenance on my cars and they have lasted over 200K miles on average. I’ve never even had to replace a clutch. Only one that went bad on me prematurely was a Nissan with a CVT. After 160K miles and facing my third transmission now out of extended warranty, I realized they can make great engines but suck at CVTs. Hated to get rid of it because it ran like a top otherwise.

5K change intervals (up to 7.5K to accommodate “life happening”), using semi or full synthetics, is more likely what a mechanic will confirm they do. Clean oil is the cheapest insurance you can get for your car long term. The goal of car ownership is to make that car pay you for every month you paid for it. You do the math on a 72 or 84 month loan. Then ask yourself how else are you gonna get to 250K miles or more.

Comment Re:The old auto makers are fucked. (Score 1) 146

Thinner engine oils cause less friction between the components of an engine and result in a lower amount of energy loss from the movement in the engine, but engage reduced oil film thicknesses, which requires higher tolerances and better oil or it will generate more wear and limit durability. Basically manufacturing techniques and oil chemistry does not yet allow reliably do what is necessary. What they have now is similar to low-yield chip fab process, only they have not developed a good way to test it before installing the engine.

Have not developed a way to test it? Bullshit.

The exact same motor is installed in the American variant and the EU variant. Do you know what the oil recommendation differences are and more to the point why they are different?

0W-20 runs in the American motor in order to barely eek out another 1MPG to barely meet the CAFE standards necessary to ship product. 5W-30 runs in the EU motor because it’s the best viscosity for the damn engine. Which they determined long ago with engineering and testing, both in lab and real world results.

Now pull those engines apart after 100K miles and see why we need to get rid of CAFE bullshit. The American environment isn’t being “saved” by forcing Americans to replace their disposable cars before the fucking loan is even fully paid.

Comment Re: Erm (Score 2) 21

Rockets that are capable of delivering a nuclear weapon into orbit, and their components, are legally defined as export controlled munitions. Taking pictures of export controlled munitions on a personal device is almost certainly going to get you into some pretty deep shit, even if you have no intention of exporting. Federal law, see ITAR.

Comment Re: They are objectively wrong (Score 1) 196

I didn't need to call anything out by name- we weren't having a citation battle. You just plain can't frame this stuff appropriately, that's not my fault. You let me know when you've attended lectures in the memorial series for the former university president with a doctoral student in economics in the process of defending their dissertation that cites the guy, then we can discuss when and whether it's necessary to

Nobody asked for your life story.

name drop. I'll give you a hint: only one of the two people referenced has a last name that starts with 'B.'

If I mention the Philips curve, that doesn't mean I'm name-dropping Bill Philips. Many (most?) economic concepts have a name tied to them, and when you talk about them, nobody assumes you're talking about the person behind them. Besides, when I referenced the capital B, there was literally only one relevant name in that page you gawked at, not two, and that was only to get you to actually read the material rather than just do a control-f. Why you're doing this here, I have no idea, but it doesn't even matter.

Let me make this easier for you: my public food bank will spend all of my donation as well. If that donation was big enough they install a sink to wash the produce, I'd indeed expect someone to consider its value to the clients,

And what would you say if they used it to install a hot tub for the staff? That's basically what's happening at a lot of these institutions. Besides, this still isn't relevant to Baumol, which is the whole reason you even went down this rabbit hole.

not arrive at a conclusion to which their political position is a necessary precondition.

I specifically excluded politics in my first post. The only relevance it has is in whether the government should be putting tighter limits on student loans. That's it. You know another reason I say that? A few weeks back I was dating a woman who graduated from Cal Tech, and she was telling me about how some of her classmates were spending student loan money on completely ridiculous stuff, like using it to buy a brand new car in one case. If somebody does something THAT stupid with their loans, there is zero reason for the taxpayers to bail them out. Full stop. It would likewise make a lot of sense to reduce the loan amounts to encourage borrowers to choose less expensive schools.

But it won't surprise me at all 10 years from now when the employees are paid twice as much while distributing the same amount of food.

Unless you're sitting here trying to argue that Baumol explains all, or even a slight majority, of why modern students are spending a lot more on their education than their parents did, then this is a totally moot point. Not only are you fixated purely on the tuition cost which is only one of four reasons I alluded to in my post, but you're also assuming that all the money is being spent wisely, which goes back to the original question I posed: Is it worth the cost?

But continue grasping at straws.

Comment Re: Of course it does (Score 1) 74

a) The fact that Starlink controls the software on the terminals and is allowed to send the location from the terminal to their system.

You're assuming that it cannot be and has not been tampered with or that GPS spoofing has not been employed (neither of which are really even necessary.) You're also assuming that there must be a constant GPS fix. These are really bad assumptions to make, especially in a place as unpredictable as a warzone. Even if what you claim is true (it's not) you're also asking Ukraine to rule out the use of its own Starlink aviation systems, which probably isn't a good idea.

b) The fact that Starlink clearly states that they know, and need to know, your exact terminal location in order to allow handovers to happen correctly.

Where do they state that they need it for that? And even then, I suspect that's for a residential (fixed) terminal, where GPS is also an administrative requirement rather than a strictly technical one. Besides, if it always depended on that to locate the bird, there's no way in hell that starlink mobility terminals could work reliably. A GPS fix isn't continuous, the first fix needing upwards of minutes depending on the last almanac update, with subsequent fixes taking several seconds at a minimum. GPS is not A-GPS. This is not street navigation with your cell phone. So long as you have the current time, GPS also isn't strictly necessary to establish an initial link. It'll take perhaps a bit longer, but it can still be done without a precise location.

If you've ever aimed a Ku band dish at a geostationary satellite, you'd know that being off even by a millimeter on either azimuth or elevation can really fuck your signal. So how do you believe viasat has been doing exactly this with phased array antennas on airliners for the last 15 or so years? It still works fine in turbulence even. Phased steered antennas update their direction in time scales of nanoseconds without needing to rely on external sensors. By the time you wait for GPS to get a new fix any time there's a light bump, you've already lost your link.

Besides, Starlink is designed to provide high bandwidth, low latency service. It's not designed to tell the military where the bad guy is. And when you say this:

SpaceX could be reporting the incoming locations of missiles and could be cutting service as soon as they realize that there's a surprise terminal moving rapidly towards a Ukrainian city.

What do you think this is? Command and conquer with starlink terminals? Cheese...

Comment Re:Too late. (Score 1) 56

Those who try and blame Trump for Americas debt will likely Make Asylums Great Again in order to treat long-TDS

I mean yeah, it's unfair to blame him for more than about a quarter of it.

Not a mathematically sound decision to try and grab the bull debt by the balls and find a point somewhere in the shit.

Obama almost doubled Americas debt during his term, and the DEI regime was burning through trillions (plural) every year.

Comment creepy (Score 1) 50

>"giving users personalized cards that showcase their top channels, interests, and a personality type based on their watch habits."

There are reasons I have never logged into YouTube and watch everything as a non-user. They still learn and show related or relevant stuff, but probably just tied to a generic cookie s897fds8d7fds89sdf7sdfs9v8ds7df89a0b

Comment Re:70% of middle class jobs (Score 1) 56

The billionaires have decided we're going to have feudalism and are working on dismantling capitalism so that they know longer depend on consumers and employees for their wealth and prestige and power. They are creating a world where they do not need you to buy their products. So they already have a solution to the problem it's just their solution doesn't include you.

If the billionaires were actually smart, they would have found a way to curb their incessant Greed and find balance in Capitalism to keep the peace they need.

They're so blinded by greed that they fail to realize they're the first on the fucking menu after the collapse they're creating. A person can easily defeat an ant. That same person can easily be defeated by underestimating what a few hundred million ants will do.

Comment Good luck (Score 2) 17

I very much miss the "real" Netflix (Netflix Disc) service.

Unfortunately, my city's library system is not very good. Their collection sucks (mostly old DVD's, nothing remotely recent, and I believe nothing BluRay) and much of their "collection" is just some strange Hoola/Overdrive streaming service.

Oh, and they don't list, online, what media anything is (DVD, BlueRay, 4K), everything says "DVD" (of which I have no interest).

Comment Re:Too late. (Score -1, Troll) 56

"Trump needs to pick fights the USA can win."

Trump's definition of "win" is not the same as yours. Trump's winning always ends in bankruptcy.

Bankruptcy is a scared child pissing themselves in the corner compared to a $38 trillion dollar debt monster.

Those who try and blame Trump for Americas debt will likely Make Asylums Great Again in order to treat long-TDS. We will see if that happens before liberalism succumbs to its own cannibalism.

Comment Re:It's a Bold Strategy (Score 1) 84

I'm curious if you'd be comfortable if the people who manage your investment portfolio or retirement accounts were to act that way. Everyone always complains about the other guy being greedy, but seems to overlook their own behavior or that kind of behavior when it's beneficial to them. No one would be happy if their bank forsook their fiduciary duties and lent money irresponsibly and lost their depositors money because they didn't want be seen as money chasers.

It's your money though. Use it how you will. Just don't complain if it doesn't work out the way you wished it would have. The only sort of charity that ought to exist is personal charity. Even that is not immune to scammers and those who would try to take advantage of others, but it limits the damage that can be done.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us

Working...